Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Элька, midsize fashion блогер

Channel

Элька, midsize fashion блогер

@elvirakainazar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,221subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194945633
TypeChannel
Username@elvirakainazar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elvirakainazar

Growth

2,2212,2272,22411 August 2026 — 2,227 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,226 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,221 subscribers11 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,220–2,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:342,221-5
12 Aug 2026, 03:222,226-1
11 Aug 2026, 10:482,227first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 2,221 subscribers
Avg views / post
569
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held7 (31 March 20262 August 2026)
Views total2,843
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5659.6%
🥰1212.8%
🔥1010.6%
💯88.51%
👍77.45%
😍11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC419 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Мои образы 🥰🫶🏼

7🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC444 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Красные кроссовки Арт.658633696 Желтые кеды Арт.658634001 Серые кроссовки Арт.658634538 Бело-зеленые кроссовки Арт.658633356 Коричневые кеды Арт.734282212

👍5🔥4

2 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC436 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Кроссовки списывают слишком рано 🙈 В последнее время все чаще слышу от стилистов: «Кроссовки уже не актуальны, лучше заменить их на балетки или лоферы». Но давайте честно – это слишком категорично. Да, балетки и лоферы вернулись в моду, но кроссовки никуда не делись. Более того: • Ретро‑модели выглядят невероятно стильно, особенно с феминными, элегантными силуэтами. • Объемные модели легко вписываются в современны

💯8

30 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC593 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Все вещи, что сейчас выставлены – это летняя разгрузка. Удаляю сразу то, что выкупили, чтобы лента оставалась актуальной. В августе-начале сентября будет еще одна разгрузка, уже с верхней одеждой на осень‑зиму и теплыми вещами🫶🏼

9🔥1😍1

29 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC951 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Спустя 4 месяца я возвращаюсь в Telegram — и начну с разгрузки гардероба. Решила распродать часть вещей, чтобы освободить пространство для нового. Цены будут приятные, все вещи в хорошем состоянии. 📍 Только для Астаны и Алматы. 🚚 В Алматы смогу привезти после 17 августа. Следите за обновлениями. А для всех остальных, с этой неделе снова начну делиться ссылками на свои находки с маркетплейсов и не только. Спасибо, ч

12🥰12

31 Mar 2026, 12:34 UTC≈2,390 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Артикулы и ссылки 🫶🏼 Плащ 0518/046/813 Молочные льняные кюлоты 4344/043/712 Блузка с бантом 1113/059/104 Голубые джинсы 6929/249/406 Серый шерстяной кардиган 5897/100/802 Толстовка 3641/393/401 Балетки 3511/710/400 Туфли 2256/710/500 Рубашка в полоску 2207/519/044 Сумка рыжая Сумка #капсулы2026

14

31 Mar 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,900 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Давно обещала вам возвращение таких подборок — и вот они снова здесь! Я сама обожаю капсулы, но признаюсь: за годы работы стилистом в школе стиля я сделала их столько, что какое-то время даже смотреть на них не могла 🙈. Сегодня собрала для вас капсулу на весну для девушек L‑XL. Основные вещи — из Zara, а сумки добавила с Lamoda. Получился универсальный сет, который легко адаптировать под разные настроения и ситуации

14🔥4👍2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @elvirakainazar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,362,705 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Элька, midsize fashion блогер” (@elvirakainazar), 2,221 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elvirakainazar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.