Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 87 days, net +582. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,713–3,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 02:51
3,389
-6
29 Oct 2026, 23:16
3,395
-10
26 Oct 2026, 20:56
3,405
-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:36
3,409
-12
21 Oct 2026, 03:28
3,421
-7
18 Oct 2026, 08:26
3,428
-5
15 Oct 2026, 02:18
3,433
+5
12 Oct 2026, 05:01
3,428
+11
5 Oct 2026, 06:54
3,417
+29
26 Sept 2026, 11:21
3,388
+44
17 Sept 2026, 10:15
3,344
-15
13 Sept 2026, 12:59
3,359
-9
9 Sept 2026, 12:17
3,368
+26
3 Sept 2026, 23:39
3,342
+28
31 Aug 2026, 10:25
3,314
+24
27 Aug 2026, 23:42
3,290
+10
25 Aug 2026, 02:16
3,280
+57
21 Aug 2026, 09:36
3,223
+171
18 Aug 2026, 03:11
3,052
+48
14 Aug 2026, 21:38
3,004
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
276 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
167
60.5%
🔥
70
25.4%
custom 5233326257566916464
13
4.71%
😁
13
4.71%
🎉
8
2.90%
custom 5363983084016377517
3
1.09%
💯
2
0.725%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌝Мой девятый год на Бали — всё!
За день до вылета на каникулы в Россию мы в 7 утра пошли на пляж с подругой фотографироваться. И вот! Оставляю фотокарточки в ленте на память ❤️🌊
По ощущениям этот год на Бали был про возвращение к себе и своей силе. Во всех её смыслах.
⭐️Дальше план такой: в августе я в Москве и Питере, в сентябре — в Ярославле. И потом — назад, в Индонезию.
Если вы только подписались, привет вам!…
🌝 Я сегодня в перелётах ( Бали ➡️Москва ), и завтра ко всем по всему вернусь. Не теряйте!
И скажите, вот вы видели, как моют самолеты? А вот!
Теперь видели💭
⭐️Два года назад я начала вести долгие и небольшие группы по блогам. Так понравилось, что прошлой осенью я закрыла всееее короткие курсы, которые до этого вела 8 лет.
Рассказала в карточках, чем конкретно я сейчас занимаюсь по работе 🙌
@elsaharova - пишите в лс, если вам отзывается, и вы тоже хотите ко мне в группу на осень.
🌝Апдейт по этой истории с питанием. Вот такие результаты за 30 дней я получила. Делала бодискан до и сегодня. 🎉🔥
Что самое классное для меня, что я не была голодная. Довольно много ела, но следила за своими категориями и играла в свою игру в 1900 поинтов.
☃️ фильм на вечер с эффектом погружения в юность ➡️
«Майл-Энд-Кикс» (Mile End Kicks — Лёгкий фильм на летний вечер, нетупой, хорошо снят, красивая работа с цветом, играет Барби Феррейра. Фильм снят в Канаде.
Оставляет тёплое чувство. Наверное, мелодрама или комедия, но если и комедия, то не такая, что смеешься до коликов в животе.
Про юношество, про становление женщины, про глупые решения, творчество, путь, дружб…
❤18😁3custom 53639830840163775173
Signed Елена Сахарова
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @elsaharova_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лена Сахарова в телеграм🎙” (@elsaharova_tg), 3,389 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elsaharova_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
