3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 128–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 15:48
128
-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:30
129
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:34
129
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 47s
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,083 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
178
16.4%
👍
148
13.7%
🥰
141
13.0%
😍
134
12.4%
🤩
125
11.5%
❤🔥
106
9.79%
❤
98
9.05%
💯
74
6.83%
🎉
67
6.19%
👏
5
0.462%
🙏
4
0.369%
🤔
2
0.185%
🆒
1
0.092%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,083reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 18 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ellin_arch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2025 to 19 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сделали новый проект с Мишей Константиновым (@KONSTANTINOV_ARTCUT), который в этот раз занял кресло оператора-постановщика. Производств мы снимали много, но в этот раз, хотя как и всегда, захотелось сделать по-другому, поинтереснее.
У нас на руках было два типа материала: светлые готовые объекты в городе и само производство. Совместить их в монтаже «в лоб» не вариант - слишком разная эстетика. Поэтому решили раздели…
Мероприятие по запуску IBA Connect завершено.
Почти два месяца подготовки. Для нас с @glory_exp и @gleb.glory, это был некий рубикон, который нужно было перейти.
Для организации и сервиса мы привлекли event агентство SVET.
Вместе со @Svetlanabaerman выстроили концепцию и взяли на себя режиссуру мероприятия.
Отдельный момент - гости. В начале больше всего переживали, успеем ли всех пригласить и какой будет отклик…
🎼 На днях весь день в голове крутилась «Чунга-Чанга».
Но звучала она… скажем так, не совсем радужно))
В моей версии это был почти драматический саундтрек.
Вечером пришёл домой, наиграл основной мотив (оригинал ни одна программа не пропустила), закинул в Suno и после примерно двадцати попыток получил вот такой результат.
В голове это звучало чуть иначе, но всё равно любопытно.
Интересно, какими красками может заигр…
ТРАГЕДИЯ И ГЕРОИЗМ КАК СМЫСЛ ЖИЗНИ.
Наш Ум влюблен в трагедию не потому, что он садист. Скорее он древний жрец смысла, который боится пустоты и отсутствия смысла больше, чем боли.
Для зависимого и определенным образом сформированного Эго страх быть обычным, сравни страху умереть, не жить.
Спокойствие для него похоже на сенсорную депривацию, на исчезновение сигнала Жизни. А трагедия, наоборот, дает сигнал громко и б…
Писал, писал посты и выпал. Все таки при большом объеме работ, на это вообще не остается времени.
Так что, пока делюсь одной из недавних работ, которую многие уже видели.
📝 Цена Света: Как Тед Лассо превратил свою Тень в оружие
(и что это значит для нас)
Если тебе лень читать, то пролистай до конца! Там будет новость)
АКТ 1: ВСКРЫТИЕ ГЕРОЯ. АНАТОМИЯ ОПТИМИЗМА.
Мы привыкли к историям о том, как тьма поглощает героя. Как травма становится ядом, отравляющим все вокруг.
Но сегодня мы направим наш скальпель в другую сторону.
Все видят в Теде Лассо простого, милого парня из Канзаса с н…
Можно начать игнорировать реальные проблемы, прикрываясь маской «все хорошо».
❗️В творчестве это ведет к созданию плоских, беззубых историй, в которых нет настоящего конфликта.
❗️Эмоциональное выгорание. Невозможно быть солнцем для всех 24/7. Постоянно играя роль источника света и поддержки, можно истощить свой собственный ресурс и оказаться в полной темноте.
❗️Потеря себя. Броня может прирасти к коже. Можно насто…
🎧 ARCHI-005-Царь и его Тень
Аудиоверсия прошлого поста.
Если удобнее слушать, а не читать, вот она.
На фоне: Jeff Russo - Franklin's Memory
4,5 минуты.
Про наглядный пример из сериала "Снегопад", куда нас могут привести наши демоны.
🥰38😍29👍28❤🔥27🤩24🎉20
Signed Nik Ellinsky
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ellin_arch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ellin_arch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@glory_exp named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎥 ELLINSKY | Архитектура Творца” (@ellin_arch), 128 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ellin_arch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.