Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net -137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,011–6,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 09:20
6,032
-11
31 Oct 2026, 19:19
6,043
-14
28 Oct 2026, 15:27
6,057
-7
25 Oct 2026, 22:27
6,064
-9
23 Oct 2026, 01:45
6,073
-10
20 Oct 2026, 07:26
6,083
-7
17 Oct 2026, 08:09
6,090
-3
14 Oct 2026, 07:11
6,093
-9
10 Oct 2026, 19:57
6,102
-16
4 Oct 2026, 23:37
6,118
-22
25 Sept 2026, 11:39
6,140
-22
17 Sept 2026, 10:41
6,162
-6
13 Sept 2026, 06:18
6,168
-1
12 Sept 2026, 08:22
6,169
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 7 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
101
Videos
9
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,693 reactions across 7 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
783
46.2%
💔
224
13.2%
👍
218
12.9%
😐
82
4.84%
🤮
71
4.19%
😁
59
3.48%
😱
39
2.30%
❤🔥
31
1.83%
🗿
24
1.42%
👏
22
1.30%
🔥
21
1.24%
🍓
19
1.12%
💘
19
1.12%
👎
17
1.00%
😨
16
0.945%
🤔
14
0.827%
🤣
8
0.473%
👌
6
0.354%
🤡
6
0.354%
🥴
6
0.354%
3 further kinds
8
0.473%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2023 to 28 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe, Édouard Manet, 1863
ناهار در چمنزار- ادوار مانه
• این نقاشی یکی از جنجالی‌ترین آثار زمان خود بود. تصویر یک زن برهنه در کنار دو مرد با لباس مد روز در فضای باز، ناهار می‌خورند. این موضوع و رویکردی که مانه در نمایش بدن زن برهنه اتخاذ کرد، که به صورت غیرروایی و مستقیم بود، با مخالفت و تعجب مخاطبان و منتقدان مواجه شد. این اثر به عنوان یکی از کارهای پیشگام در جنبش امپرسیونیسم شناخته می‌شود.
@Ell…
Toshio Saeki
(1945 – 2019)
توشیو سائکی مانگاکا ی (تصویر گر) معاصر رو میشه بزرگترین نقاش سبک اروتیک معاصر دونست. اغلب بجز تم اروتیک، فانتزی های خشونت آمیز هم در آثارش وجود داره طوری که بیننده از تصورش شگفت زده میشه.
تو ایران خیلی شناخته شده نیست آثارش ولی یک خلاقیت منحصر بفردِ ژاپنی مآبانه‌ای در تک تک اثارش وجود داره که جالب توجهه.
لوسین فروید از هنرمندهای قرن بیستمی متولد آلمان که نوه‌ی همون زیگموند فروید روان‌کاو معروفه.
لوسین فروید از معدود هنرمندانیه که در زمان زنده بودن به کارهاش بهای زیادی داده شده و چنتا از نقاشی هاش رکورد بالاترین قیمت یک تابلو رو برای یک هنرمند زنده جابه‌جا کرده.
مشخصه‌ی کارهاش فیگورهای برهنه از اندام‌هایی که به تعبیر خودش «کژ ریخت»
هستن.
لوسین البته که خیلی خوشنام نبوده و معروف بوده به ارتباطات فرا زناشویی ز…
«پریمو لوی» تعریف می‌کند یک روز زندانیانِ آشوویتس را به صف می‌کنند و افسر نازی اسامی اعدامی‌ها را می‌خواند. او یک‌جا «پریمو» را می‌خواند اما بلافاصله نام خانوادگی دیگری را اعلام می‌کند. لوی می‌گوید یک لحظه خوشحال شدم ولی باقی عمر شرم آن خوشحالی خفه‌ام کرد. لوی چهل سال بعد خودش را می‌کُشد.
شرم، همیشه چنین چیزی‌ست: شرم از به جای کسی اعدام نشدن، به جای کسی زندانی نشدن، به جای کسی سرکوب نشدن، به جای کسی استثمار نشدن، به…
Matthew William Peters
متیو ویلیام پیترز نقاش انگلیسی که فیگورهای اروتیک زیادی کشیده بود ولی وقتی به مقام کشیش سلطنتی منصوب شد از تمام نقاشی های اروتیکش اظهار پشیمانی کرد.
مردک سالوس😁
چنتا دیگه از آثار ویلیام-آدولف بوگِرو
نورپردازی قوی، فیگورهای تا حدودی شهوانی، جزئیات دقیق در آناتومی از ویژگهای نقاشی بوگرو هست.
The First Mourning 1888
Pieta 1876
The Birth of Venus 1879
❤67👍19❤🔥3🔥1
Signed El
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ellenafard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
YEnglishtube @Yenglish · 26,310 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ellena's Archive” (@ellenafard), 6,032 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ellenafard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
