Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EliteTraders - Free

Channel

EliteTraders - Free

@elitetradersiofree

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,663subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374819273
TypeChannel
Username@elitetradersiofree
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elitetradersiofree

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6631,6851,6747 August 2026 — 1,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,685 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,683 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,681 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,680 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,679 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,678 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,676 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,675 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,673 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,670 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,667 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,663 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,660–1,688 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:551,663-4
13 Sept 2026, 19:561,667-3
10 Sept 2026, 10:211,670-3
4 Sept 2026, 19:181,673-2
29 Aug 2026, 03:161,675-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:411,676-2
23 Aug 2026, 03:361,678-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:431,679-1
16 Aug 2026, 18:431,680-1
13 Aug 2026, 08:341,681-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:101,683-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:461,685no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:341,685first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 February 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1446.7%
👍516.7%
🔥413.3%
😱413.3%
👏310.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2023 to 2 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Mar 2023, 11:25 UTC≈2,380 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We are closing this telegram in 12 hours!!! Make sure you are in our new, main telegram. Much more content, free tools, giveaways, analysis and motivation! DAILY! t.me/elitetradersio

😱4👍2🔥2

26 Feb 2023, 21:24 UTC≈2,580 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @elitetradersio

Good morning Elites. We will be hosting a webinar at 8am AEST time. (1 hour from now)

👍1

26 Feb 2023, 21:24 UTC≈2,630 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Link for this will be in the NEW telegram! t.me/elitetradersio

1👍1

24 Feb 2023, 09:54 UTC≈2,510 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Important update with you regarding our EliteTraders community! 📣 With the upcoming significant changes, including the launch of our new app 📱, we have made the decision to delete all our existing Telegram groups... 😯 However, fret not! We have created a new, singular, and primary group that will serve as the official channel for our EliteTraders community moving forward. We encourage you to join this group immedia

👏2👍1

23 Feb 2023, 13:35 UTC≈1,490 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Elites, listen up! 💥 The path to trading success is paved with obstacles, setbacks, and tough lessons… But let me tell you something: You are strong enough, smart enough, and resilient enough to overcome them all. Don't let fear or self-doubt hold you back. Believe in yourself, stay disciplined, and keep pushing forward. We are here to support you, challenge you, and help you achieve your goals. So rise to the ch

9👏1

23 Feb 2023, 09:56 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CHFJPY closed for 220+ pips 😎👍🔥 Join the team here: www.EliteTraders.io

21 Feb 2023, 17:15 UTC997 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Now, have a look at our current trades: 🇬🇧🇦🇺 GBPAUD // This trade has retraced today, nothing to worry about as we are currently in net profit. 🇳🇿🇨🇭NZDCHF // Nice move today! Now we are almost +1% in profit with this one 🤯 🇨🇭🇯🇵 CHFJPY // Unstoppable move! This trade is running with +2.5% profit - risk free! ✅ Our floating profit is still around 2.5%! Our portfolio is balanced so far 👌 Have a nice day! 🌤

21 Feb 2023, 17:15 UTC856 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hey Elites! 💸 🌎 Let's talk a bit about what's happening right now: 🇷🇺 After today's speech by Putin, there has been a notable increase in geopolitical tensions. Comments, such as - PUTIN: RUSSIA TO SUSPEND PARTICIPATION IN THE START TREATY - PUTIN: WEST SEEKS TO CHANGE LOCAL CONFLICT INTO GLOBAL ONE - PUTIN: IF USA WILL CONDUCT NUCLEAR TESTS, WE WILL DO THE SAME are being assessed by market participants, pricing

21 Feb 2023, 10:53 UTC705 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥1

20 Feb 2023, 15:09 UTC787 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

How's it going, Elites? 😎 Here is how our trades are going 👀 🇬🇧🇦🇺 GBPAUD // Nice move today! We are back into small profit and we are seeing favourable momentum 🪃 🇳🇿🇨🇭NZDCHF // This trade is going well, still at 0.75% profit 💥 🇨🇭🇯🇵 CHFJPY // Amazing start to the week 🤯 This trade is running with +2% profit - risk free now (SL at BE)! ✅ Everything is running well, send profits to t.me/etc_andrew - we love to see

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @elitetradersiofree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EliteTraders - Free” (@elitetradersiofree), 1,663 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elitetradersiofree.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.