Work is done. Wallets are found. It's time to rest 🏊🏼♂️ Have a good evening and big findings 💰 See you tomorrow 😎

Channel
</> ELITE SCAN
@elitescann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001806606399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elitescann |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elitescann |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 20 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 21 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 1 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
My clients often say they wish they had STARTED EARLIER 🔙 And I understand them. But it's better not to worry about the past - and focus on making the most of now 👉 🕓 Time is our most valuable resource, and it's important to allocate it wisely for maximum benefit to ourselves.
This wallet has been waiting for a worthy owner for a whole 🕓 7 years and finally found one. Someone put $20 into it in 2017 and today that money has grown to $919 📈 It's truly incredible, isn't it? Find wallets with us 👉 @Admin
💬 Some feedbacks from our members who joined us recently and FOUND THEIR FIRST WALLETS 💰 Join us today 👉 @Admin
📊 No matter what happens on the crypto market - WE MAKE MONEY EVERY DAY! Good morning, guys!☀️
🙅 "Finding wallets is illegal" I can only say what's really illegal is looking for excuses instead of doing something that generates real income and your wellbeing 💰 Find wallets with me 👉 @Admin
Believe in yourself and never give up. If we can do it, so you can too 👌💰 Find wallets with me 👉 @Admin
Greetings from "ANOTHER REALITY"✌ Made $294 as many people love to name it "money from the air" 🙈 Okay, let it be 😎
Which opinion is closer to yours?
- 1. Work hard for playing bills22%
- 2. Make own reality78%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
As always, opinions are divided 💬 1️⃣Some believe that there's no other way. Bills need to be paid. 2️⃣While others have already realized that we create our own reality and it's important to value our time.
THIS GUY SET A GOAL ✔️to relocate from the parents' house to his own apartment - and he successfully made it. ➡️So stop complaining that you don't have enough money to make your dreams/goals come true - everyone earns with us without exception.
Just opened this wallet 🔥💎 When you open new wallets that software found for you - don't forget to transfer the coins to your own account. I use TrustWallet for keeping all findings ✅
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @elitescann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which opinion is closer to yours?
- 1. Work hard for playing bills22%
- 2. Make own reality78%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2024 to 4 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@elitescann named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 6 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 6 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“</> ELITE SCAN” (@elitescann), 20 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elitescann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.