Ану, у кого є припущення? Бо мені здається, що якщо в компі було шось крім оперативки, то це просто звучить як казочка))

Channel
Eliptoss ПК🇺🇦
@eliptoss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,255subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001970946588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eliptoss |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eliptoss |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 1,255 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 1,258 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,267 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 1,267 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.5%
- avg views ÷ 1,255 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 508
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.982%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (26 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,554 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
91 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 29.7% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 22.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 16.5% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 12.1% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ще трохи і Windows 7 повернуть, би було що на компи ставити в разі гострої кризи
😁9👏2❤1😢1
Про пост вище ⬆️ Виходить тепер є нова критерія системних вимог: -“Без турбот Lite 16ГБ ” -“Без турбот PRO 32ГБ ” -”Без турбот ULTRA PRO MAX PLUS MEGA 64ГБ ” Чекаємо зникнення памʼяті з магазинів і нової критерії: -”Без турбот mini 8ГБ ” Ну це жарти, але не смішно😏
😁4🤔3
Microsoft видаляє рекомендації про 32 ГБ ОЗП через дефіцит пам'яті 😅 На тлі стрімкого подорожчання оперативної пам'яті компанія непомітно видалила зі свого Windows Learning Center сторінки з рекомендаціями щодо обсягу ОЗП для геймерів. Раніше Microsoft називали 16 ГБ базовим мінімумом, а 32 ГБ — «ідеальним» варіантом без турбот. Обидва документи тепер ведуть на головну сторінку розділу.
👍4🤔2
Знайшов фотки свого першого плюс-мінус норм пк, з якого почався мій канал. Як вам? Є хтось, що памʼятає його характеристики? Ніби недавно було, а ніби і не в цьому житті 😏 Став мені тоді приблизно 10-11к. З цікаво нюансів , збирав більше як три роки тому десь , але зараз щось схоже за ці гроші не збереш, і це при тому, що там деякі комплектуючі були навіть нові
❤2👍1
Мій Дуалшок помалу доживає свої останні місяці. Підбираю собі новий геймпад. Поки душа лежить би взяти Дуалсенс, але хочеться шось нове спробувати, тому ще і розглядаю інші варіанти. До чого власне цей пост, хочу почути хто чим користується і відгук про конкретний пристрій, цікавлять саме мінуси девайсів, бо плюси ітак зразу всюди описують))
Як би що, то в нас є таке : https://t.me/eli_baraholka
👍3
ТОПОВА ВІДЕОКАРТА З 2008 РОКУ У НОВОМУ ПК https://youtu.be/Qu9Iia-oaOc
❤2
Протестували Dragon Lucky з RTX 5060 TI 16GB та Ryzen 5 7500f у 007 First Light 👀 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRdBbWZWhDA
👍6
Неочікувано прийшло трохи колекційних штук від ROG. Подобається 🔥
🔥15
Ну ок, не став 🙄
🤝5
Пів годинки і драйвер під Вінду 11 став😂 Що буде далі…
😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @eliptoss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eliptoss ПК🇺🇦” (@eliptoss), 1,255 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eliptoss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.