Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒓🧜🏻‍♀️

Channel

𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒓🧜🏻‍♀️

@elenitas_we

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004433017046
TypeChannel
Username@elenitas_we
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 26 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elenitas_we

Growth

111211.57 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:0411-1
12 Aug 2026, 05:3012no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3212first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘562.5%
🥰225.0%
🆒112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026

Чота мне не нравится ничо ато, пока буду работать в хелпе

2 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026

Я ухожу, при желании перенесём мью и сотрудничества на другой канал

1 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖🔵 2026. @. Trυᧉ Ning2 ˋˋ 🤩 🎀 ყꭷur lꭷve ( 🔵 ) ᧉviᧉ prꭷd ?? 🎀 · ➿ 🎀 · ➿ · 🎀 ➿ · 🎀sჩᧉ 🔵 sɑid thɑt sჩᧉ lꭷvᧉd 🎀 ꭷткрывɑю набꭷр на sꭷlꭷ 0/1 🔵 ִ ׄ 🔵 » grꭷυp 0/1 & ꭷtჩer 0/2 . ₊ ִ ׄ mყ ɑrtist 🤩 读书 !! @evieprd🎀 information #. bot 🤩 evie . best · ➿ 🎀 · ➿ · 🎀 ➿ · 🔵 ჩꭷt &&. Aυditiꭷn . 读 🔵

🥰1

1 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC343 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

──★ ˙🧜🏻‍♀️ ‌ !!Nᴇw wᴏrᴋ𖦹🩵 .✦ ݁˖ 𑣲𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦: 𝘡𝘦𝘳𝘰 .✦ ݁˖ 𑣲𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵: me .✦ ݁˖ 𑣲𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦: 𝟓𝟏𝒎 .✦ ݁˖ 𑣲𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘯: минималистично ƒᴏɼ 𝒶𝓃 𝗈𝗋𝚍𝚎𝚛: t.me/elenitas_we?direct @elenitas_mebot . ݁₊ ⊹ . 🧊. ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ .🩵 ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ 🧊 ݁. ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁🩵

💘1🥰1🆒1

1 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @oi_yunmPhoto

⌗ Эᴧᴇниᴛᴀ Пᴏᴩᴛ ʙыɯᴇᴧ иɜ ᴩᴇᴄᴛᴀ и ᴏᴛᴋᴩыᴧ бᴇᴄᴨᴧᴀᴛныᴇ ɜᴀᴋᴀɜы https://t.me/elenitas_we/81 #Elenitasport #free

💘2

1 Jul 2026, 05:03 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒓🧜🏻‍♀️»

30 Jun 2026, 19:53 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026

Если я уйду, мью и сотрудничества перенесу на другой тгк

30 Jun 2026, 11:05 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🥹в новую студию дизайна срочно нужно талантливые люди! вся информация в комментариях 🥹

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @elenitas_we. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒓🧜🏻‍♀️” (@elenitas_we), 11 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elenitas_we.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.