Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Елена Горбачева - винная богиня 🍾

Channel

Елена Горбачева - винная богиня 🍾

@elenafooror

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,318subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001329688139
TypeChannel
Username@elenafooror
Created30 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elenafooror

Growth

5,3165,3205,3187 August 2026 — 5,320 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,320 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,319 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,316 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,318 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,315–5,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:055,318+2
10 Aug 2026, 14:235,316-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:065,319-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:155,320no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:075,320first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.40%
avg views ÷ 5,318 subscribers
Avg views / post
340
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.585%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (17 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total3,744
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1047.6%
838.1%
🥰314.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC232 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4🥰3

9 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC233 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Господи, спасибо тебе за таких прекрасных студентов 🙏🏼 Я сейчас смотрю на тех, кто пришёл ко мне учиться, читаю ваши сообщения, вижу, какие вы все разные, интересные, умные, любопытные и думаю: ну какие же невероятные люди здесь собрались. Кто-то только начинает разбираться в вине, кто-то уже давно в теме, кто-то пришёл для себя, кто-то, чтобы сделать вино профессией. Но объединяет вас одно: огромное желание узнава

2

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC364 viewsread 12 August 2026

Нужна ваша помощь! Помогите выбрать иконку будущего винного приложения🙏 Проголосуйте в запретграме какая больше нравится👇👇👇 ПОСМОТРЕТЬ ВАРИАНТЫ И ПРОГОЛОСОВАТЬ Как в прошлый раз мы с вами вместе выбрали название книги "Сам Себе Сомелье", помните? Очень жду вашей помощи🙏

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC277 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC318 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC321 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

База для жизни Подробности и вход тут👇 [ПРИСОЕДИНИТЬСЯ] Если нужна помощь — пишите @LenwineZabota

1

25 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC624 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ДРУЗЬЯ 🍷 ВАЖНЫЙ ДЕНЬ Открываем продажи на 2-х недельное обучение к курсу «Профессия Сомелье» Что это: 15 уроков, чтобы понять вино и винную индустрию + живой практический мастер-класс, чтобы закрыть все вопросы о том, как бокалы влияют на вкус вина Кому подходит: — тем, кто хочет не просто чувствовать вино, но и уметь объяснить, что чувствует — тем, кто хочет разбираться, чтобы не платить за вино вслепую — тем, у

2

19 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC559 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Записала для вас большой разбор — 11 минут про просекко. Без воды, как на уроке, только веселее 🍾 Одно и то же слово на этикетке — а разница в цене между бутылками до пяти раз. И у полки её не видно. После этого видео — будет видно. Что внутри: — почему просекко ≠ дешёвое шампанское (это вообще другой напиток) — пирамида из трёх этажей: DOC ➡️Asolo ➡️Valdobbiadene — ловушка этикетки: Extra Dry слаще, чем Brut. Да,

3

17 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC411 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Впереди еще 2 эфира! "Метод дедукции", ошибки сценаристов известного сериала "Капли Бога", финальное испытание и объявление "Наследников" ...На кону, на минуточку, 6 вин, в том числе моих (которых уже просто не найти никогда и никому) Сказать, что я в предвкушении и очень довольня — ничего не сказать.. Будем ли повторять такое? Не факт.. Можно ли еще успеть попасть? Еще сегодня и всё Ушла готовиться к завтрашнему э

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @elenafooror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,134,250 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ТВОЙ СОМЕЛЬЕ 🍷
@chris_tella_wine · 102,039
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Елена Горбачева - винная богиня 🍾” (@elenafooror), 5,318 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elenafooror.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.