Huh. Rather interesting π
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²

Channel
@electionevidence
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
5,679subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001179076417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @electionevidence |
| Description | The Official Telegram group of ElectionEvidence.com and www.UnmaskingTruth.org |
| Created | 14 April 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/electionevidence |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 5,679 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 5,693 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 5,693 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
303 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 78 | 25.7% | |
| π₯ | 68 | 22.4% | |
| π | 59 | 19.5% | |
| π | 31 | 10.2% | |
| π | 23 | 7.59% | |
| π― | 18 | 5.94% | |
| π | 15 | 4.95% | |
| πΎ | 4 | 1.32% | |
| π | 4 | 1.32% | |
| π₯± | 2 | 0.66% | |
| π© | 1 | 0.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2025 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Huh. Rather interesting π
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
NOW - Trump signs executive order curbing mail-in ballot fraud, requiring Homeland Security to prepare a list of citizens eligible to vote in each state, require the Postal Service to only send absentee ballots to voters on the list and mandate those ballots have envelopes and barcodes for tracking. @disclosetv
π31π5π₯3
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
βοΈ These are the kind of beliefs the world has because βthey do not believe in the one whom God has sentβ - Jesus (John 16:9) They call God an asshole because they do not understand or consider the vastness of space. They do not understand that βSatan himself masquerades as an angel of lightβ, or that Jesus called him both βthe prince of the airβ and βthe ruler of this world.β They also call God an asshole despiteβ¦
π₯10π―3
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
JD Vance on UFOs: "I don't think they're aliens, I think they're demons." Why didn't they register demons.gov then? (He says he hasn't spent enough time on the subject to understand it, but then says his firm opinion on it....c'mon man) Many people view this subject with black/white, fundamentalist attitudes. And by doing this, I think they miss large parts of the picture. Logically, yes, some beings out in the cβ¦
π5
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
And for those still struggling to understand why the church is all screwed up and are looking for a way to grow closer to Jesus in these times⦠this is your answer :) https://www.audible.com/pd/B0FB93GG16
β€3
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
For those still confused about Iran this is an absolute must read and share!!! https://x.com/paul_furber/status/2030627560422244518?s=20
π2π©1
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
Yaβll feel that? Pretty sure the tables just turned. Never EVER letup patriots. We must NEVER allow this ever again.
β€23π―15π₯4π3
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
For those of you familiar with Edβs role in destroying the deep state, I would say itβs pretty obvious where this is goingβ¦ looks like it was a βpay to play all alongβ¦β HOW MUCH DID YOU SELL THE SIGNATURES FOR JOE? HOW MUCH MONEY DID YOU CHARGE FOR THE PARDONS AND OTHER SIGNED DOCUMENTS???
π₯21π4
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
JON HERALD AND BADLANDS MEDIA ARE 100% INNOCENT!!! (And Iβm a bigger fan than ever because of it!!!) Stop listening to the morons like Brian Cates and others. The second I heard the details I knew this was just a bad breakup with a psycho chick goldigger trying to take his money. How? Itβs easy and anyone whoβs ever been in business knows itβ¦ Who filed the articles of incorporation aka the business license??? Evβ¦
β€7π₯±1π1
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
God of our ancestors and Lord of mercy, You have made all things, and in Your providence have charged us to rule the creatures produced by You; to govern the world in holiness and righteousness and to render judgment with integrity of heart. Give us wisdom, for we are Your servants, weak and shortβlived, lacking in comprehension of judgment and of laws. Indeed, though one might seem perfect among mortals, if wisdom,β¦
π17β€4π1
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
Anyone remember Trumpβs very first meeting in office was with Bukele? I think itβs safe to assume there was a reason why ;) Interesting to see Scavino post thisβ¦
π12π1
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
Get ready :). God bless you all and God bless this great nation. JESUS!!! BE WITH US AND GUIDE US IN THE TIMES AHEAD! WE PRAY FOR YOUR GRACE AND YOUR MERCY AND WE PRAY THIS NATION RETURNS TO YOU LORD!!! https://x.com/georgepapa19/status/1950989256517997019?s=46
π21πΎ4
Signed EvidenceAnon πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @electionevidence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 976,361 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βElectionEvidence πΊπ²πΊπ²πΊπ²β (@electionevidence), 5,679 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/electionevidence.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.