Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Арбитражник с авито

Channel

Арбитражник с авито

@eldarmamaev

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

87,320subscribers

+30,638 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871789534
TypeChannel
Username@eldarmamaev
DescriptionОфициальный партнер биржи Bybit в 🇷🇺 wayfs.ru Нет платного консультирования.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eldarmamaev

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

69,000 average views per post against 84,115 subscribers — an engagement rate of 82.0%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,448,700
Mature posts only84.5% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers84,115 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,315 channels · p10 2.60% · p25 5.08% · p50 10.5% · p75 20.8% · p90 35.5%
Position in cohort99.447th percentile · 7.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.029% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

56,68287,32072,0017 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net +30,638. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,086–91,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 16:5087,320+893
10 Nov 2026, 11:0986,427+806
8 Nov 2026, 23:0685,621+645
7 Nov 2026, 16:0684,976+254
6 Nov 2026, 14:3684,722+247
5 Nov 2026, 16:0784,475+360
4 Nov 2026, 17:2784,115+184
3 Nov 2026, 19:5983,931+244
2 Nov 2026, 20:2583,687+288
1 Nov 2026, 23:4883,399+386
31 Oct 2026, 23:2783,013+253
30 Oct 2026, 19:4982,760+283
29 Oct 2026, 20:3182,477+441
28 Oct 2026, 17:1082,036+491
27 Oct 2026, 16:5681,545+652
26 Oct 2026, 15:2880,893+550
25 Oct 2026, 17:2780,343+399
24 Oct 2026, 14:1679,944+298
23 Oct 2026, 10:5479,646+310
22 Oct 2026, 11:0679,336first reading

Engagement

122 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 210 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.7%
avg views ÷ 87,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
72,200
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 122 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held122 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,515,800
Reactions total26,334
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
301
Videos
20
Links
50

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

73,111 reactions across 122 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 543398534292966840073,111100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 122 of the 122 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73,111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 122 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
118
of 122 we hold a reading for · 97%
Most on one post
328
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eldarmamaev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 122 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈177,000 views411 reactions14 Starsread 14 November 2026

Приветствую трейдеров, постоянников и т.п. Собираю базу постоянников. Поэтому желающие стать постоянниками и закупщиками тезера, для Вас есть оффер. писать менеджеру: @lure_013 upd: не пишите кто хочет постоянника, тут оффер для тех, кто сам будет постоянником.

custom 5433985342929668400411

10 Nov 2026, 12:45 UTC≈78,800 views393 reactions20 Starsread 14 November 2026

‼️ С 1 июля 2027 года привычный P2P в России перестанет работать по старым правилам ‼️ И я уверен, что далеко не все понимают, насколько серьезно это может повлиять на их заработок. Последнее время я подробно разбирался в новых правилах и подготовил для вас несколько бесплатных уроков. ✔️ В них расскажу: — Что именно изменится с 1 июля 2027 года — Какие направления работы останутся доступными — Как подготовиться к…

custom 5433985342929668400393

9 Nov 2026, 00:45 UTC≈77,900 views693 reactions16 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5433985342929668400693

9 Nov 2026, 00:41 UTC≈74,700 views687 reactions11 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5433985342929668400687

8 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC≈46,800 views1,230 reactions81 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,230

7 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC≈43,700 views1,280 reactions34 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,280

6 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC≈52,100 views1,290 reactions74 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,290

5 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTC≈44,600 views1,280 reactions45 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,280

4 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC≈55,700 views1,080 reactions23 Starsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @murikdonskiVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,080

2 Nov 2026, 13:41 UTC≈117,000 views1,230 reactions36 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,230

31 Oct 2026, 15:50 UTC≈111,000 views1,060 reactions14 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,060

31 Oct 2026, 10:43 UTC≈55,300 views1,360 reactions33 Starsread 14 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54339853429296684001,360

Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @eldarmamaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 17 posts on @eldarmamaev as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
48 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Надыр Махмудов
@nadyrlife · 9,193
#1
The Raven | P2P | Арбитраж
@raven_p2p · 8,195
#2
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,804,918
#3
Crypto Chicha
@chicha00795sss · 6,114
#4
Будни Арбитражника
@levip2p · 5,003
#5
Trade Desk
@TradeDeskPro · 963
#6
Крипто Махачкала
@crypto_makhachkala · 547
#7
CRYPTO_SQUAD | Kestym
@crypto_squad_kestym · 4,555
#8
Криптаны и P2P
@ahm_p222pi · 5,518
#9
Карты, деньги, два стакана
@vvaybit · 755
#10
gasan.p2p
@gasanp2p · 3,433
#11
Питупи и чай
@amanatniyru · 4,775
#12
AMRU
@amrupitupi · 4,141
#13
Monskich
@poleznoep2p · 5,153
#14
Питупи
@mediap2p · 89,113
#15
Медийка
@mediyca · 1,084,649
#16
JG team blog
@JGinfo · 1,339
#17
Аяланское | Gasanov
@duvurlaHukumat · 2,796
#18
Бажа глаголет.
@numynu · 1,834
#19
Омаров.
@oma7ov · 1,597
#20
MOSCA Channel
@MOSCA_channel · 8,229
#21
Renatko и Шачир
@renatkotv · 188,171
#22
MIR P2P
@MIRP2P · 1,598
#23
Dinislam_kripta
@dinislam_kripta · 1,510
#24
Usama | P2P
@usamaY800AY · 16,507 (as read 23 August 2026)
#25
Селим Реджепов
@selimcrypto · 9,853
#26
ASHIR
@ashirp2p · 6,101
#27
P2P Surf | USDT - RUB
@p2p_surf_feed · 1,231
#28
Офис Стила | steel streams
@steelstaya · 285,851
#29
дневник финансиста
@drizzzer · 635
#30
Klima™
@klima_tm · 3,857
#31
@financial_trends
@financial_trends · 11
#32
BAGILOV
@BagilovP2P · 139
#33
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 462,780
#34
Crypto Molnia⚡️
@CryptoMolnia · 481
#35
ICEFINGROUP
@icefingroup · 3,495
#36
Министерство Крипты
@onIypravda · 255
#37
РЕНАТКО
@renatko_medjidov · 46,289
#38
Нетипичная Махачкала © | Дагестан
@official_atypical · 227,988
#39
Голос Дагестана/Новости Дагестана
@golosdagestana05 · 340,639
#40
ЭХО ДАГЕСТАНА | Махачкала Дербент Хасавюрт Каспийск Буйнакск Избербаш Кизляр
@ekho_dagestana1 · 212,874
#41
k500kk126
@k500kk126 · 18,842
#42
ТУТ ДАГЕСТАН
@tutdagestan_05 · 234,098
#43
Блог Дагестана / новости
@dagestanblog · 231,452
#44
MBEX(Канал)
@mbex_fin · 890
#45
Mansur
@mans_carseller · 11,274
#46

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gadji Gadjiev
@gadji_gadjiewww · 29,998
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 7 September 2026
MAJORKA
@majorka_private_tg · 70,579
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 August 2026
Питупи
@mediap2p · 89,113
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
ДТП/ЧП 05
@dtpchp_dag · 42,988
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Арбитражник с авито” (@eldarmamaev), 87,320 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eldarmamaev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.