Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elayne Shmeyt

Channel

Elayne Shmeyt

@elayneshmeyt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,489subscribers

-310 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831993901
TypeChannel
Username@elayneshmeyt
Created7 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elayneshmeyt

Growth

25,48925,79925,6447 August 2026 — 25,799 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,799 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,767 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,746 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,685 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,631 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,634 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,619 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,578 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,547 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,513 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,489 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -310. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,443–25,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:5525,489-24
16 Aug 2026, 19:5325,513-34
15 Aug 2026, 05:2325,547-31
14 Aug 2026, 00:3725,578-41
12 Aug 2026, 20:1325,619-15
11 Aug 2026, 21:4825,634+3
10 Aug 2026, 23:0725,631-54
10 Aug 2026, 00:4525,685-61
9 Aug 2026, 02:3125,746-21
8 Aug 2026, 01:2525,767-32
7 Aug 2026, 17:0025,799no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:5025,799first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 25,489 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,490
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held25 (29 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total212,150
Reactions total7,701
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7,701 reactions across 25 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘4,04552.5%
custom 54114481462889757603,65647.5%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,701reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 25 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elayneshmeyt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈4,220 views327 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Делаю портфолио.

💘327

13 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈5,900 views168 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘117custom 541144814628897576051

13 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,310 views166 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘115custom 541144814628897576051

13 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈5,300 views113 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @plagueswamp228File

File, posted without a caption

custom 541144814628897576091💘22

13 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈6,380 views362 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5411448146288975760226💘136

12 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈6,850 views57 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Я давно хотела себе джинсы на низкой посадке, но каждый раз откладывала, потому что не могла найти такие, которые будут смотреться актуально 😭 А тут узнала, что BIMBO TWINS сделали те самые идеальные джинсы из 00-х в современном стиле, а еще и дарят подарок при покупке! Решила, ладно, это тот и самый знак. Особенно мне понравилась белая модель c поррезями по всей длине (это что за свэг), а силуэт клеш - то, что ну

💘43custom 541144814628897576014

11 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈6,940 views266 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘171custom 541144814628897576095

11 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈7,120 views168 reactionsread 17 August 2026

фея на реке смотреть бесплатно 💗💗💗

custom 5411448146288975760126💘42

11 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈7,500 views208 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

https://www.instagram.com/p/Db5YiKCDJYW/?igsh=MWRqZzZ3ZHIzNjZneg==

custom 5411448146288975760159💘49

10 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC≈8,100 views331 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Хотите ооочень топовые фотки покажу

💘234custom 541144814628897576097

9 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈8,560 views483 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘307custom 5411448146288975760176

9 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈8,860 views415 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Я лесной эльф.🧝‍♀️

💘283custom 5411448146288975760132

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @elayneshmeyt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,440,895 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elayne Shmeyt” (@elayneshmeyt), 25,489 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elayneshmeyt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.