Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for البـرَكَةُ مـعَ الأَكابـرِ

Channel

البـرَكَةُ مـعَ الأَكابـرِ

@elakabr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,891subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194555356
TypeChannel
Username@elakabr
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elakabr

Growth

1,8911,9021,896.56 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,891 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,889–1,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:081,891-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:471,893-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:181,896-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:011,901-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:471,902first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2026, 17:04 UTC342 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ittibaalsunah

🔽 السؤال 🔽 شيخ وفقك الله. عندي محل إنشائية، يأتي الزبون يأخذ مني بضاعة بالتقسيط. مصرف الرافدين أطلق منصة عملها كالآتي: ينزل بطاقة (ماستر كارد) الزبون على هذه المنصة، وبعد عشرة أيام يقوم المصرف بسداد مبلغ البضاعة بدل الزبون، ويقطع عشرين بالمائة تلقائيا، فما حكم هذه العملية؟ بارك الله فيكم. 🔽جواب الشيخ عبيد الشمري 🔽 هذا ربا صريح، المصرف يستقطع من الزبون بطريقتين: الأولى يستقطع شهريا من الزبون ويحولها إلى التاجر، هذه ال

17 Jan 2026, 14:14 UTC426 viewsread 7 August 2026

✅ قائمــة ⬅️【 البركة مع الأكابر 】⬇️ 📲 تقــدم لكـم مجموعـة مـن القنـوات السـلفيــة 📮 اضغط هنا ↙️ https://t.me/addlist/9l68tdZtO9ExNGU6 https://t.me/addlist/9l68tdZtO9ExNGU6 https://t.me/addlist/9l68tdZtO9ExNGU6 ━═══🌷⬇️🌷═══━

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @elakabr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 644,763 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“البـرَكَةُ مـعَ الأَكابـرِ” (@elakabr), 1,891 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elakabr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.