Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for El Vórtice Radio.

Channel

El Vórtice Radio.

@elVortice

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,904subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001248760260
TypeChannel
Username@elVortice
Created25 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elVortice

Growth

1,9041,9101,9076 August 2026 — 1,910 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,910 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,909 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,908 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,907 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,905 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,904 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 14 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,903–1,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 14:031,904-1
17 Aug 2026, 10:381,905-2
13 Aug 2026, 15:461,907-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:161,908-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:441,909-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:311,910no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:451,910first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 19s
Average length
3m 10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10258.3%
5028.6%
🙏63.43%
🤡63.43%
👏52.86%
👎21.14%
🔥21.14%
😁21.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 03:25 UTC397 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Reunión N.° 164 de la Coalición Internacional por la Paz (CIP) - Viernes, 24 de julio de 2026 11:00 am (H/Este de EU) / 5:00 pm (H/central europea) 𝗘𝗹 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶́𝗼𝗱𝗼 𝗱𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝘀 𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘀 𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗼 𝗽𝗼𝗿 𝗭𝗼𝗼𝗺. 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗮 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝗿 𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗥𝗘𝗚𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗔𝗤𝗨𝗜: https://es-schillerins... Únete a la reunión de la Coalición Internacional por la Paz (CIP) este viernes 24 de julio a las 11:00 am (hora del Este de EU) en la que nos acompa

👍9

24 Jul 2026, 03:24 UTC402 viewsread 7 August 2026

--La interpretación simultánea al alemán, español, francés e inglés, es sólo por Zoom-- Por favor, comparte la invitación ampliamente. Únete a la reunión de la Coalición Internacional por la Paz (CIP) este viernes 24 de julio a las 11:00 am (hora del Este de EU) en la que nos acompañarán como ponentes Helga Zepp-LaRouche, fundadora del Instituto Schiller; Jack Gilroy, de Pax Christi, estado de Nueva York; Pax Christi

24 Jul 2026, 03:24 UTC396 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/schillerinstitute/mailings/16466/attachments/original/164.png?1784830620

15 May 2026, 11:33 UTC983 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BagaudaCatalanaPhoto

CASTELLANO El euskera no se encuentra únicamente en el corazón de la cultura vasca. En Cataluña tenemos numerosos topónimos y raíces etimológicas, tanto del castellano como del catalán, que demuestran la interrelación y el origen común de las tres lenguas. Además, el euskera es una lengua y una cultura llenas de un profundo significado, donde cada palabra y cada topónimo nos transmite un mensaje de nuestros antepasa

6👍6🤡6

14 May 2026, 07:56 UTC998 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Buenos dias!! Os paso enlace a la entrevista de Luis Miguel de Benito en el podcast - La boca del lobo. Como siempre digo, no te creas nada de lo que escuchas aquí, haz tu investigación, reflexiona y pasa la bola. Espero que estéis bien, a pesar de las circunstancias. Un abrazo.

👍121

14 May 2026, 07:56 UTC953 viewsread 7 August 2026

Esta mañana en la radio, con Javier García Isac, En la boca del lobo

13 May 2026, 06:37 UTC≈1,140 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

En este video introductorio https://youtu.be/9ZpKG1dbQt8?is=t6MFr8sjcA3KbcCt insisto en que lo importante es ver la charla de la Dra. Karina Acevedo cuyo enlace está en la descripción y que además copio aquí 👇 https://odysee.com/@drBenito:7/Chantavirus:9?r=4e18ibHwLsA6xK12BkwouiQimaAVZkwZ Cuando lo haya visto, será una de las personas que más saben de Hantavirus del planeta.

👍111

5 May 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,090 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BagaudaCatalanaPhoto

Revolución bagauda vascona y orígenes del cristianismo El hallazgo arqueológico de la mano de Irulegi y las polémicas excavaciones de Iruña-Veleia Entrevista a Patxi Alaña Arrinda, de la asociación Biltzarre por la soberanía del batzarre, que nos hablará de cómo las instituciones del Estado han querido ocultar y eliminar las evidencias arqueológicas que demuestran la antigüedad de la lengua vasca y la influencia del

👍5😁21

27 Apr 2026, 20:49 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍75🔥1

25 Apr 2026, 03:48 UTC≈1,240 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Un punto de vista diferente. Para mi es sorprendente que la “nueva derecha española” venda Israel como - “el único proyecto democrático en Oriente Medio”, obviando la historia de Irán. En esta entrevista se tocan puntos esenciales sobre el conflicto que pueden ayudar a que algunos recuperen la menoría, y a que otros vean Irán con otros ojos. Os la recomiendo. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=w5_gccQXNEg&pp=iggUQAFKE

👍116

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elVortice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 750,872 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“El Vórtice Radio.” (@elVortice), 1,904 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elVortice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.