Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 63 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 290–297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 23:37
296
+3
30 Sept 2026, 09:38
293
+1
16 Sept 2026, 13:55
292
+1
9 Sept 2026, 12:59
291
-1
31 Aug 2026, 12:03
292
+1
24 Aug 2026, 07:07
291
-1
15 Aug 2026, 17:14
292
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:17
291
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:07
291
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5274150836543431478
8
33.3%
❤
4
16.7%
custom 5339543324237775075
3
12.5%
custom 5249230933780878643
2
8.33%
👍
2
8.33%
💘
2
8.33%
custom 5260660803828207265
1
4.17%
💯
1
4.17%
🔥
1
4.17%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда кажется, что десерты с хорошим составом - это всегда дорого
Мы решили развеять этот миф и собрали подборку любимых десертов до 1500 ₽✨
Все десерты приготовлены без сахара и пшеничной муки ➡️ с чистым составом и вкусом, который не хочется сравнивать с «ПП-десертами». Это просто по-настоящему вкусные десерты✅
Выбирайте десерт для себя, в подарок или к семейному чаепитию ✨
💌 Напишите нам в ekotort_bakery - по…
Когда гости подходят к сладкому столу, первым внимание привлекает торт 🍰
А потом взгляд останавливается на деталях…
Кейкпопсы в том же стиле, что и торт, поддерживают общую концепцию оформления и становятся красивым акцентом сладкого стола. Их удобно брать, они нравятся и детям, и взрослым, а внутри наш фирменный состав без сахара и пшеничной муки 💕
А еще такой набор легко станет самостоятельным подарком ✨
Дарит…
Утром хочется одного: чтобы завтрак был вкусным, полезным и не отнимал много времени
Именно для этого мы создали наши сырники. Больше никакой суеты, горы муки на столе и грязной посуды с самого утра.
Достаточно просто достать их из морозилки, обжарить до румяной корочки - и можно спокойно собираться по делам.
📝 Состав, КБЖУ, цены и подробности собрали для вас на фото к этому посту.
Свежая партия уже готова!
❤️…
Один торт на всю компанию. Но что делать, если у каждого гостя свои ограничения в питании? 🤯
Знакомая задачка для любого, кто хоть раз организовывал семейный праздник❔
Мужчинам хочется «посытнее», подруги берегут талию, у старшего поколения под запретом сахар, а у детей - аллергия.
Мы в «ЭКО торт» решаем этот квест одной коробкой. Мы готовим десерты без сахара и пшеничной муки, чтобы за праздничным столом каждый чу…
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ekotort_bakery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EKOTORT BAKERY” (@ekotort_bakery), 296 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekotort_bakery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
