Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,003–6,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 23:16
6,038
-13
7 Nov 2026, 16:59
6,051
-5
4 Nov 2026, 18:00
6,056
-7
1 Nov 2026, 17:59
6,063
-3
29 Oct 2026, 21:08
6,066
+11
26 Oct 2026, 21:55
6,055
-3
23 Oct 2026, 19:56
6,058
-11
20 Oct 2026, 21:36
6,069
-12
17 Oct 2026, 15:58
6,081
-11
14 Oct 2026, 13:37
6,092
-19
11 Oct 2026, 06:01
6,111
-19
4 Oct 2026, 23:02
6,130
-34
25 Sept 2026, 07:17
6,164
-25
16 Sept 2026, 14:19
6,189
-7
12 Sept 2026, 13:38
6,196
-10
8 Sept 2026, 19:00
6,206
-15
3 Sept 2026, 20:39
6,221
-7
31 Aug 2026, 20:44
6,228
-5
28 Aug 2026, 22:48
6,233
-9
26 Aug 2026, 01:07
6,242
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 22 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 6,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,700
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
17 (22 October 2025 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
3,400
Reactions total
203
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 51s
Average length
2m 57s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
949 reactions across 16 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
475
50.1%
🤬
157
16.5%
🔥
91
9.59%
😱
66
6.95%
👍
55
5.80%
👏
18
1.90%
😢
17
1.79%
🤡
16
1.69%
😭
8
0.843%
😁
7
0.738%
🤮
7
0.738%
❤🔥
6
0.632%
😡
5
0.527%
⚡
4
0.421%
💊
3
0.316%
👎
2
0.211%
👻
2
0.211%
🥰
2
0.211%
🍾
1
0.105%
👀
1
0.105%
6 further kinds
6
0.632%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 949 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Akcija uklanjanja SNS grafita
Danas od 12h kod Veterinarskog fakulteta (i širom Srbije)
Dobro jutro! Nas nekoliko danas u 12h krečimo grafite na potezu od Franša do Veterinarskog fakulteta, sa obe strane ulice. Svako ko želi da nam se pridruži je dobrodošao.
Juče nismo morali da plaćamo mehanizaciju, a stigle su i nove članarine, tako da ćemo kupiti materijal za sebe i za još desetak ljudi. Možemo da obezbedimo ma…
Eko Straža i Zavrni Rukave vas pozivaju: čistimo Pionirski park! 🧤🌳
Pobeda na izborima je tek prvi korak. Kao što smo mnogo puta do sada pisali, pravi posao počinje tek kada se taj korak pređe.
Niko neće voleti ovu zemlju više od nas. Zato svi moramo da se uključimo u „politiku“ (aktivizam, javne stvari) i da kao zajednica učestvujemo u stvaranju boljeg mesta za sve nas.
Simbolično vas pozivamo na prvu akciju Zavrn…
Momčilo Marjanović svedok saradnik/pokajanik u Birnovom podkastu otkriva kako je policija Ćacijima saopštila da "pokriju uši" i najavila upotrebu zvučnog topa. Sem toga otkriva kako su stotina hiljada eura iznesene iz JKP "Novosadska Toplana", kako je sa 10 momaka imao zadatak da zastrašuje i tuče... Nađite celu epizodu na youtube-u: Ispovest iz Ćacilenda.
Dragi eko-saborci,
Po broju lokacija, i ovogodišnja akcija „Zavrni rukave" blizu je prošlogodišnjeg rekorda. „Zavrni rukave" je treća najveća manifestacija u Srbiji po broju učesnika posle Drinske regate (20.000) i Beogradskog maratona (14.000) sa 11.700 aktivnih volontera.
Ljudi su samoorganizovani preko društvenih mreža, uz minimalnu medijsku podršku i svega nekoliko stotina dolara uloženih u oglasnu kampanju.
M…
U prilogu je snimak lovaca od pre nekoliko godina u kojem mrcvare dve ranjene svinje, jednu dave u potoku, zatim dave kanapom, šutiraju i na kraju pokušavaju da napujdaju psa na nju.
Osoba koja je tada snimila i objavila video dobila je pretnje jer su navodno akteri pripadnici policije. Da li je ovo sport? Da li je to taj uređeni lov u Srbiji? Da li je ovo ta briga da se životinje ne nakote?
t.me/ekostraza
Sledeća grupa studija na koje smo se fokusirali jesu one koje dovode u vezu PM2.5 čestice i pojavu ili pogoršanje atopijskog dermatitisa.
PM2.5 kao nevidljivi okidač ekcema – šta nauka danas zna o finim česticama i atopijskom dermatitisu?
Atopijski dermatitis (AD), odnosno atopijski ekcem, dugo se smatrao „bolesti kože“ koju pokreću genetika, alergeni, stres i ishrana. Poslednjih godina u tu mrežu uzroka ulazi još j…
Ovo su SATNE vrednosti. Vranje trenutno ima skoro duolo veće zaganje nego najzagađeniji grad na svetu (gde su popisani gkavni gradovi i oni preko milion stanovnika), a to je Delhi.
Čuli smo i stalno slušamo o PM2.5 česticama, ali da li znamo šta je to PM i zašto baš 2.5? PM2.5 je danas globalni standard u merenju zagađenja, ključni indikator javnog zdravlja i referentna tačka u svakoj raspravi o kvalitetu vazduha. Ali zašto baš 2.5? Zašto ne 3 ili 5 mikrometara? Odgovor leži na preseku biologije, fizike i toksikologije.
PM je skraćeno od particulate matter, dok 2.5 označava da čestica ima aerod…
Radnici Zijina su nam poslali zahtev da preko nas objavimo šokantne i zabrinjavajuće podatke. Naime, određeni broj radnika je samostalno uradio analize krvi na teške metale i utvrđeno je da su koncentracije olova devet puta veće od dozvoljene. Osim olova, kod pojedinaca su detektovane i povišene vrednosti arsena.
Prema informacijama do kojih smo došli od zaposlenih, među radnicima u proizvodnji (oko 200 ljudi) sprov…
Već postoje brojne studije koje povezuju zagađenje PM2.5 česticama i srčane mane kod novorođenčadi, ali ova studija je objavljena u novembru ove godine. Ova studija, sprovedena na uzorku od više od 42.000 trudnoća u Kini i objavljena u časopisu The Lancet Global Health, donosi nove dokaze o tome kako je izloženost trudnica sitnim česticama zagađenja vazduha (PM₂.₅) direktno povezana s povećanim rizikom od ozbiljnih u…
❤37👍7💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ekostraza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
192.rs @press192 · 26,576 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eko Straža Public” (@ekostraza), 6,038 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekostraza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.