Channel
@ekogazeta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
238subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001528439755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ekogazeta |
| Description | «Оила ва табиат» ижтимоий-сиёсий, экологик газетасининг Телеграм канали. Телеграм каналимизга қўшилинг ва бизни кузатиб боринг: @ekogazeta Мурожаат учун: @oilatabiat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ekogazeta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 238 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 238 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,568 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
46 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 32.6% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 30.4% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 30.4% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Озиқ-овқат пластик контейнерлари қанчалик хавфсиз? Ишлаб чиқарувчилар контейнерларнинг хавфсизлигини таъкидлашига қарамай, экспертлар бу борада маълумотлар етарли эмаслиги ва иссиқлик таъсирида пластик таркиби ўзгариши мумкинлигини айтмоқда. Ҳар бир хонадонда кўплаб пластик идишлар мавжуд. Аммо пластик таркибида минглаб кимёвий бирикмалар бўлиб, уларнинг аксарияти ҳақида кўп нарса билмаймиз. Масалан, пластикка эги…
#ОГОҲЛАНТИРАМИЗ ❌Белгиланмаган жойларга ахлат ташламанг ёки ташлаб олов ҳам ёқа кўрманг! 📸 Километрлаб узоқликдаги камералар шахсингизни, машина рақамингизни аниқлаб, камида 1 200 000 сўмдан жарима ёзади. Кўча-куйга ахлат ташлайдиган яқинларга юборинг. 😎 Telegram 🕸 web
👍1👏1🔥1
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰🥰 Экран қаршисида кўп вақт ўтказганидан афсусланаётган ёшлар сони ортмоқда Ёшларнинг учдан икки қисми ижтимоий тармоқлар фойдадан кўра, кўпроқ зарар келтиради, деган фикрда. Болалик пайтидан смартфон ишлата бошлаганлар эса ҳозирга келиб бундан қаттиқ афсус қилмоқда. Энг муҳим жиҳати - улар туғилажак фарзандларини интернетдан ҳимоялаш ҳақида ўйлашяпти. Қонуний томондан интернетни хавфсизроқ қилиш чоралари …
👍1👏1🔥1
🌳 «Oila va TABIAT» газетасининг 2026 йил 6 августдаги 32-сонида ўқинг: ✅ Абдушукур ҲАМЗАЕВ: «Изланган имкон топар» деган халқона ҳикматнинг ҳаётий исботи Қорақалпоғистондаги ҳар бир маҳаллада, ҳар бир хонадонда кўринмоқда ✅ Ишонч шундай оқланади! Экологик партия депутатлари яна сайловчилар ҳузурида ✅ Ноқонуний кийим-бош учун жавобгарлик кучайтирилмоқда ✅ Маҳалла аҳлининг розилиги – ислоҳотларнинг ҳаётий пульси ✅…
👍3🔥2👏1
🍃 Жонли табиат мияга қандай таъсир кўрсатади? Европа тадқиқотлар маркази олимларининг хулосаларига кўра, кўпроқ яшил ҳудудларда яшайдиган инсонларда мия фаолияти ва тузилиши яхшироқ бўлишини исботлади. Мияда кулранг – фикрлаш ва эслаб қолиш билан боғлиқ қисм, оқ модда эса қисмлар ўртасида маълумот алмашинувини таъминлайди. Доимий яшил ҳудудлар аҳолисининг мия қисмлари юқорироқ, бундай инсонларнинг когнитив қобилият…
👍1👏1🔥1
🔥 Қизиб бораётган миялар ёхуд инсонлар фикрлашига таъсир қилаётган иқлим ўзгариши Иқлим инқирози энди фақат табиат билан боғлиқ муаммо эмас. У аллақачон инсон организмига кириб борди. Энг хавотирлиси, унинг таъсири танамиздаги мураккаб тизим – бош мия фаолиятида ҳам сезилмоқда. Олимлар жазирама нафақат танани ҳолдан тойдириши, балки фикрлаш, хотира, кайфият ва асаб тизимини ҳам издан чиқариши мумкинлигини таъкидла…
👍1👏1🔥1
Экран қаршисида ўтказилган вақт бола хотираси ва ўқишига салбий таъсир қилади World Journal of Pediatrics журналида эълон қилинган тадқиқот сингапурлик ва франциялик олимлар томонидан ҳамкорликда олиб борилган. Унда 502 нафар бола туғилганидан бошлаб то 10,5 ёшга тўлгунга қадар узоқ вақт давомида кузатиб борилди. Тадқиқотнинг бош хулосаси шундаки: боланинг 1 ва 6 ёшлигида телефон ёки телевизор қаршисида кўп вақт ўтк…
👍1👏1🔥1
🧐 Агар сиз ҳар куни 4 соат вақтингизни ижтимоий тармоқларни скроллинг қилишга сарфласангиз, ўртача 10 йил умрингизни йўқотасиз. 😄 Мунтазам скроллинг бахт даражасининг пасайиши, руҳий саломатликнинг ёмонлашиши, муносабатлардаги муаммолар ҳамда иш унумдорлигининг пасайишига сабаб бўлади. 😎 Telegram 🕸 web
👍1👏1🔥1
🤩Хўш, нега дунё бунчалик хавотирга тушди? Тадқиқотлар шуни кўрсатадики, ўсмирлар кунига ўртача етти соатдан ортиқ вақтини интернетда ўтказмоқда. Бу шунчаки вақт йўқотиш эмас, балки инсон миясининг биологик ривожланишига бевосита таҳдиддир. Ижтимоий тармоқлар миянинг «мукофотлаш тизими»ни суиистеъмол қилиб, ҳар бир «лайк» орқали организмда дофамин ажралишини келтириб чиқаради ва болаларда гиёҳвандликка ўхшаш қарамлик…
👍1👏1🔥1
🌳 Экологик бефарқлик меваси биофобия фақат психологик муаммо эмас. Агар инсон ўзини табиатнинг бир бўлаги деб ҳис қилмаса, унда табиатни асрашга нисбатан масъулият уйғонмайди. 🌱 Иқлим фаоли ва психолог Леа Дом таъкидлаганидек, табиатдан қўрқадиган авлод келажакда глобал иқлим ўзгаришларига ва ҳайвонот оламининг қирилиб кетишига «шунчаки статистика» сифатида қарайди. 🧒 Бугун биз соя берадиган дарахтни аёвсиз кесаёт…
👍1👏1🔥1
Сурхондарё вилояти Денов тумани Ушор қишлоқ манзаралари. Манба 😎 Telegram 🕸 web
👍1👏1🔥1
🤩 Япония чиқиндихоналари Японияда чиқиндиларни шунчаки ташлаб кетиш эмас, балки уларни саралаш, қайта ишлаш ва имкон қадар камайтириш маданияти шаклланган. Чиқиндига муносабат — бу фақат тозалик масаласи эмас. У инсоннинг масъулияти, жамият маданияти ва келажак авлодга муносабатини ҳам кўрсатади. Биз-чи? Чиқиндини камайтириш, саралаш ва исрофга йўл қўймаслик борасида японлардан ўрганадиган жиҳатларимиз борми? 😎 T…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ekogazeta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 344,497 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Oila va TABIAT» gazetasi” (@ekogazeta), 238 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekogazeta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.