8 reasons to invest p2p on blockchain.
Our chat: @eightlends_chat
Any question?: https://t.me/eightlends?direct
For partnership and other questions: [email protected]
Platform: app.8lends.io
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 96 days, net +97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,625–14,940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 20:49
14,874
-12
8 Nov 2026, 13:46
14,886
-7
7 Nov 2026, 08:06
14,893
-5
6 Nov 2026, 09:50
14,898
-6
5 Nov 2026, 11:05
14,904
+21
3 Nov 2026, 10:36
14,883
+9
2 Nov 2026, 09:11
14,874
+65
1 Nov 2026, 07:00
14,809
+62
31 Oct 2026, 03:38
14,747
+30
30 Oct 2026, 03:57
14,717
-4
29 Oct 2026, 06:21
14,721
-11
27 Oct 2026, 01:48
14,732
-9
26 Oct 2026, 01:06
14,741
-5
24 Oct 2026, 23:45
14,746
+3
24 Oct 2026, 02:16
14,743
-3
21 Oct 2026, 23:29
14,746
-7
20 Oct 2026, 20:59
14,753
-1
19 Oct 2026, 17:21
14,754
-4
18 Oct 2026, 15:38
14,758
+3
16 Oct 2026, 15:10
14,755
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.25%
avg views ÷ 14,874 subscribers
Avg views / post
930
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
58 (13 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
18,590
Reactions total
459
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
479
Videos
25
Links
444
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 12s
Average length
5m 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,171 reactions across 55 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
552
47.1%
👍
227
19.4%
🔥
209
17.8%
custom 5190816281883866902
105
8.97%
👏
59
5.04%
👎
8
0.683%
😱
5
0.427%
🤔
4
0.342%
😁
1
0.085%
🥰
1
0.085%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 58 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eightlends. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
8LNDS: How does the buyback price grow?
After the tokenomics update, many investors asked us: why hold 8LNDS, and what could make its value go up?
The main idea behind the new tokenomics is to connect the token's growth to the platform's activity. As we fund new loans, we'll add funds to the buyback reserve. We'll also add part of the markup from token purchases to this reserve.
How much USDC backs each token?
🤩 …
Is 8lends a Web3 Platform or a Traditional Lending Platform?
People often think that if a platform works on the blockchain, it's completely crypto-native. That's not quite true. Even if a platform uses blockchain, it doesn't mean that it works the same way as crypto platforms like Aave or Solana.
In our case, Web3 only handles the infrastructure:
🔘 moving USDC;
🔘 running smart contracts;
🔘 recording transactions;
…
Congrats to the winners of our Halloween contest!
Thank you all for your contributions! We've received some really cool ideas, and it was difficult to choose the best ones.
And we're sure it wasn't easy for you to choose the winners from the finalists either, but you did it!
Here are the winners you chose yourselves:
🥇 @lolecounet — 1st place: $500
🥈 @clintonaleshinloye — 2nd place: $300
🥉 @k_vti80903 — 3rd place…
How to make your first investment on 8lends?
Struggling with crypto, wallets, and all that stuff? Don't want to waste your time figuring it all out?
This guide will walk you through everything and help you set up a crypto wallet in just 15 minutes or even less!
You'll learn:
🔘 How to sign up on 8lends using your email or a crypto wallet.
🔘 How to create, connect, and export a MetaMask wallet.
🔘 How to deposit USD…
THE MONTHLY REPORT FOR OCTOBER IS RIGHT HERE!
Thanks for your patience! As always, we’ve brought you quite a lot of updates last month.
On top of that, we’ve set a record for the last 6 months:
We paid out more in interest and principal than in any of the previous six months!
🤩 You’ll find the exact number in the attached report.
🤩 Have a warm and profitable November, everyone!
20 Months of 8lends! 🤩
It's getting cold outside, isn't it? The weather is changing, but something never does: we keep sharing our monthly reports with you!
And here are some new numbers 👇
From October 1 to November 3:
🔘 Raised: $2,732,409
🔘 Total investors: 3,049
🔘 Funded loans: $25,879,414
🔘 Loans repaid: $12,998,007
As always, we'd like to thank you all for helping SMEs, us, and even yourselves grow! The comm…
✨ New Project: TAZU CREDIT LIMITED
🇰🇪 TAZU CREDIT LIMITED is a non-bank lending company based in Nairobi, Kenya, and registered in 2025. It provides digital loans to individuals and small businesses through its online platform.
The company offers two main types of loans: individual loans for entrepreneurs, senior managers, and established professionals, and business loans for small and medium-sized companies that n…
🎃 The Halloween Contest Update!
For those who missed it, here's the list of updates:
🔘 If you want to submit your idea, do it through this Google Form.
🔘 Our team will choose 5 or more ideas from all the submissions.
🔘 On November 5, we'll open a poll here: "Which of these 'hellish' businesses would you invest in?" with the projects we've chosen.
After that, you'll choose 3 winners, and on November 6, we'll announ…
Will You Make a Deal with the Devil? 😈
Would your business promise investors a 666% annual return? Or sell real estate in the afterlife?
🤩 To celebrate Halloween, we're launching a contest for the craziest business idea!
Your task is to come up with a business that people would actually want to invest in.
Here's what you need to do:
1. Come up with a company name.
2. Explain what your business does.
3. Offer inv…
🥇 We're updating 8LNDS tokenomics!
8LNDS now has its own buyback price
We've set up a dedicated USDC reserve for the token. We'll put part of our platform's proceeds into this reserve to help it grow.
📢 Buyback starts on October 29 and our cashback program will end on the same day.
We planned to pay out all vested tokens at 70% of the token's launch price.
But investors in our chat asked us to raise the price.
…
SOUTH KOREA'S STOCK MARKET LOST 39% IN JUST 5 WEEKS!
📉 It took just 5 weeks for 38.6% of South Korea's market cap to disappear.
And the reason comes down to one product you've probably never heard of.
Want to know what it is? Watch our latest video:
P.S. Something similar could happen in the US and Europe...
https://youtu.be/dK8mSSIQVYs
❤7🔥2custom 51908162818838669022
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @eightlends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩 Did our social media content influence your decision to invest?
Yes, the content was the main reason.14%
Yes, the content reinforced my decision.17%
No, your social media didn't influence my decision.41%
I only discovered your social media after investing.28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@eightlends named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@johnmighty__ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@nobisblue named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@benalicia99 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@kiararyz_ named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@kjushudrun named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“8lends Official” (@eightlends), 14,874 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eightlends.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.