27 measurements spanning 32 days, net +612. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,046–16,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 09:41
16,750
+86
5 Sept 2026, 03:38
16,664
+31
3 Sept 2026, 05:52
16,633
+18
2 Sept 2026, 03:58
16,615
+7
1 Sept 2026, 05:54
16,608
+22
31 Aug 2026, 04:03
16,586
+17
30 Aug 2026, 01:46
16,569
+13
28 Aug 2026, 23:48
16,556
+25
27 Aug 2026, 21:26
16,531
+21
26 Aug 2026, 22:46
16,510
+21
25 Aug 2026, 20:57
16,489
+23
24 Aug 2026, 23:24
16,466
+34
23 Aug 2026, 08:58
16,432
+20
21 Aug 2026, 16:58
16,412
+18
20 Aug 2026, 13:37
16,394
+18
19 Aug 2026, 11:44
16,376
+27
18 Aug 2026, 09:33
16,349
+24
17 Aug 2026, 12:06
16,325
+24
16 Aug 2026, 02:49
16,301
+17
14 Aug 2026, 11:46
16,284
first reading
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 16,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
45 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
73,997
Reactions total
2,245
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
51m 40s
Average length
1m 55s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,245 reactions across 45 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,343
41.4%
❤
918
28.3%
👍
561
17.3%
custom 5382060403796775882
90
2.77%
👏
75
2.31%
😍
72
2.22%
custom 5382056010045224622
63
1.94%
🥰
44
1.36%
custom 5384528030012047221
40
1.23%
custom 5384366427572567647
37
1.14%
custom 5382247359428199420
2
0.062%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Для проекта использовали сапфиры, изумруды и другие цветные камни разных оттенков и размеров. Нам было важно избежать ощущения равномерной мозаики, поэтому каждый камень подбирался таким образом, чтобы переходы цвета выглядели живыми и немного хаотичными, почти как сама игра цвета внутри опала.
Отдельно проработали конструкцию серёг: их можно носить как самостоятельные пусеты, так и дополнять подвесными элементами с…
Сегодня хотим поделиться историей одного удивительного проекта, главными героями которого стали опалы из Австралии.
В основе идеи лежит продолжение природной палитры самих опалов. Насыщенные синие, голубые и зеленые всполохи, которые проявляются внутри камней при разном освещении, мы перенесли в оправу и собрали вокруг них сложное цветовое паве.
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @eighteen_gems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“18GEMS | Ювелирное ателье” (@eighteen_gems), 16,750 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eighteen_gems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
