Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 8Blocks - Tokenomics

Channel

8Blocks - Tokenomics

@eightblocks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

296subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002416436769
TypeChannel
Username@eightblocks
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/eightblocks

Growth

296315305.57 August 2026 — 315 subscribers8 August 2026 — 315 subscribers16 August 2026 — 311 subscribers23 August 2026 — 305 subscribers30 August 2026 — 300 subscribers7 September 2026 — 296 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 293–318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 07:17296-4
30 Aug 2026, 10:28300-5
23 Aug 2026, 15:13305-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:06311-4
8 Aug 2026, 07:34315no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:00315first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52335019560890883821424.6%
custom 5231392044814995968915.8%
custom 5228886339419680406814.0%
🔥712.3%
47.02%
👍47.02%
🤷‍♀47.02%
custom 522440769355229304723.51%
😁23.51%
👀11.75%
👎11.75%
😍11.75%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Every crypto team tells itself the same lie… Once we list, everything clicks into place. It doesn't 😎🖼️ A listing was never going to manufacture demand. All it does is show the market whether demand was ever there. You can wire up integrations and burn millions on marketing, and none of it moves the needle if holding the token isn't something anyone needs to do. 🤯 We took our partners at DASH and rebuilt exactly

👍4custom 52335019560890883823

15 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🖼️ Europe's crypto market is about to get audited. Who's next? The MiCA transitional period closed on 1 July 2026. The unlicensed players are already gone. Now ESMA is turning to the ones who made it through. This is the first large-scale supervisory project since MiCA came into full force, and it runs almost a year, until mid-2027. Every CASP holding client assets is in scope. What it means for the market and fo

custom 52313920448149959683👎1

9 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC48 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Listing doesn't complete tokenomics, it puts it on trial The market doesn't care about your spreadsheets. It tests emission vs. demand, liquidity vs. unlocks, hype vs. real utility. And most of what breaks after TGE was already baked in before it. 🗓 Tomorrow at 2 PM UTC we get into this in an AMA with EarnPark. 🔗 Save your seat

custom 523350195608908838261😍1

8 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

A great product doesn’t always mean a great asset 🖼️ 🤔 VIRTUALS is the case that proves it. The ecosystem grew, pulled in revenue, brought in users, and most token holders still walked away empty-handed. In our latest piece, we dig into why token utility isn't the same as investment value. How incentive structures can quietly reshape a project's whole economy, and what the whole thing says about the wider AI-crypt

custom 52288863394196804065

7 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Strategy sold 3,588 BTC for $216 million The proceeds went to preferred dividend payouts and to refilling the company's dollar reserve. Strategy is still sitting on 843,775 BTC and $2.55 billion in cash after the sale. That's less than 0.5% of its total stack, but it's the biggest BTC sale the company has ever made. 😎 What's changing isn't how much they sold, it's how they think about the reserve. Bitcoin used to

🤷‍♀4

6 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nearly a million people lost money on a memecoin The guy who made it walked away with a billion…😎 Losses on $TRUMP hit $3.81B, with almost a million people underwater by the end of June. The coin cratered 97%, from a January peak of $75.35 to $1.76 in July 2026, according to The New York Times, citing Nansen. Meanwhile Donald Trump himself declared 927 pages of income from crypto projects, more than 💲1.4B in total

😁2

1 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC48 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🖼️ A good idea rarely dies to competition. It dies to its own mistakes In our new article, we break down six mistakes crypto projects make before the token ever launches. The kind that no amount of marketing, and no strong product, can fix later. 🔗 Give it a read 😎

custom 523350195608908838251

29 Jun 2026, 12:10 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Why does tokenomics fall apart after listing? The bear market usually takes the blame, but the root causes trace back to tokenomics mistakes made before TGE 😎 In our piece for BeInCrypto, we focused on two things that quietly kill a project: 🖼️ flawed distribution that keeps constant pressure on the price; 🖼️ no real use for the token, so investor interest fades the moment the hype does. We tested this against ca

custom 52313920448149959686

26 Jun 2026, 14:19 UTC47 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Crypto security is becoming its own financial discipline Most of us know how to handle fiat. Crypto still leaves a lot of people unsure of their footing. Meanwhile the market is growing up, and the industry has started to settle on a clear set of rules. In a new episode of Safety Talks, the educational project from EarnPark, Sergey Novikov (CPO at 8Blocks) breaks down what matters when it comes to tokenomics and ri

custom 52288863394196804063🔥2custom 52244076935522930472

25 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC49 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤯 A product can nail product-market fit and still watch its token sink It's a story that keeps repeating itself. The product grows, users show up, revenue climbs, and the token keeps sliding anyway. Most teams treat this as some kind of anomaly, when it's one of the most common problems in Web3. But here's the part nobody wants to hear. Product growth doesn't create token demand on its own, so when there's no li

🔥52👀1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @eightblocks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“8Blocks - Tokenomics” (@eightblocks), 296 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eightblocks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.