Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💙 أطياف الرحيل_℡💙

Channel

💙 أطياف الرحيل_℡💙

@eid7r

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,304subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001379518979
TypeChannel
Username@eid7r
Descriptionبسم الله.. نحن اطياف في هذه الدنيا وسيفرض على عليناالرحيل يوما... 7r
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eid7r

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@eid7r/151909 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC@ghawaly57r/2298515 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@eid7r/152291 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC@ghawaly57r/23036410 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@ghawaly57r/23098017 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC@eid7r/152687 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC1.0021 minutes
@ghawaly57r/23122519 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC@eid7r/153003 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC1.002 days
@eid7r/157923 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC@ghawaly57r/2409036 Nov 2026, 11:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@eid7r/151961 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC@eid7777r/1883846 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ghawaly57r9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–4)
@eid7777r7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0063 minutes@eid7777r (4–3)
@lmastt5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@lmastt (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 12 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 172 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Views per post sit far below this size band

26.6 average views per post against 8,313 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.32%. Across the 3,653 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,190–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 4.00% and 17.2%, with a median of 8.86%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured39 of 39 published in the window (39 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,036
Mature posts only0.481% over 22 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,313 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb3162:ara · 3,653 channels · p10 1.68% · p25 4.00% · p50 8.86% · p75 17.2% · p90 30.6%
Position in cohort0.821th percentile · 1/28 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.035% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · err_low, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,3048,3538,328.55 August 2026 — 8,340 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,340 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,348 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,337 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,326 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,327 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,325 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,343 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,341 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,344 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,342 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,347 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,321 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,346 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,353 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,335 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,328 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,316 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,326 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,323 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,328 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,330 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,324 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,313 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,317 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,304 subscribers5 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,297–8,360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 12:378,304-13
7 Nov 2026, 08:108,317+4
4 Nov 2026, 00:318,313-11
31 Oct 2026, 23:468,324-6
29 Oct 2026, 01:418,330+2
26 Oct 2026, 08:068,328+5
23 Oct 2026, 17:168,323-3
20 Oct 2026, 13:278,326+10
17 Oct 2026, 16:598,316-12
15 Oct 2026, 01:508,328-7
12 Oct 2026, 05:588,335-18
5 Oct 2026, 03:588,353+7
26 Sept 2026, 12:218,346+25
17 Sept 2026, 13:578,321-26
13 Sept 2026, 10:228,347+5
9 Sept 2026, 23:418,342-2
4 Sept 2026, 14:008,344+3
31 Aug 2026, 19:558,341-2
28 Aug 2026, 10:388,343+18
25 Aug 2026, 12:288,325first reading

Engagement

373 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.322%
avg views ÷ 8,304 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.7
112 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
112
of 373 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 112 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held373 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total2,995
Reactions total102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈2,390
Links
≈483

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 28s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

323 reactions across 148 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤18457.0%
👍6319.5%
🥰3510.8%
🕊134.02%
💔92.79%
👏72.17%
🏆30.929%
😍30.929%
🤩20.619%
💯10.31%
😁10.31%
😐10.31%
🤔10.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 152 of the 373 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 373 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 112 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC1 viewsread 10 November 2026

📡تصميم فديو Aiالذكاء الاصطناعي🫵ادخل وشاهد ✔️ https://t.me/WafaTasmem 👌 لمن عجز عن تأديب أولاده 🌐 عليك بهذا الدعـاء👇⭐️ https://t.me/Kitabh_X_Sorh/882 .. 🔈🌷نصيحة لمن يشتكي 👈👈 من تفلت القرآن من صدره ويجد صعوبة في مراجعته..🥺💔 https://t.me/addlist/GXsamhZ69AwxMjRk ☀️دعم قوائم الخليج الإسلاميّة «عصرية» تـرحـب بــ🤝ـكم @yeeeo❤️

Signed الخليج الإسلامية#عصرية🌟

10 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC1 viewsread 10 November 2026

📝أعمال تجري لك بعد موتك🔦 https://t.me/twakltalaallh/269611?single 📝وصــ🔟ــايــا .. للشاكي من تذبذب الطـاعـات🍂 👈👈 وعدم الاسـتمرار فيـهـا👌 https://t.me/addlist/GXsamhZ69AwxMjRk 🫵📝 علّمـوا أولادكـم .. أن لا يبكون على هزيمة في ملعب كرة القدم إنّمـا يبـكـون👇👇 https://t.me/addlist/GXsamhZ69AwxMjRk

Signed الخليج الإسلامية#عصرية🌟

10 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC10 viewsread 10 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed رحمک الله یا أبي

10 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC9 viewsread 10 November 2026

#بسماللهالرحمن__الرحيم #السلام_عليكم_ورحمة_الله_وبركاته 📚 *حــــــ نـــبـــوي ــــــديث*📚 عَنْ ‌ عُمْرَانَ بْن حُصينَ رَضِّيَّ اللهُ عَنْهُ قالَ رَجُلٌ: يا رَسولَ اللَّهِ، أيُعْرَفُ أهْلُ الجَنَّةِ مِن أهْلِ النَّارِ؟ قالَ: نَعَمْ. قالَ: فَلِمَ يَعْمَلُ العَامِلُونَ؟ قالَ: كُلٌّ يَعْمَلُ لِما خُلِقَ له، أوْ: لِما يُسِّرَ له. 📘البخاري6596 مسلم2649 📑 #شرح_الحديث 🏞️خلَق اللهُ الخَلْقَ وهدَى الناسَ إلى مَعرِفَةِ الخيرِ…

Signed رحمک الله یا أبي

10 Nov 2026, 11:35 UTC9 viewsread 10 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed رحمک الله یا أبي

10 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC15 viewsread 10 November 2026

#تربيه طفلي ضعيف الشخصية..!! ‏يشتكي كثير من أولياء الأمور من ضعف شخصية أطفالهم، وهم في حيرة حول كيفية تقويتها .. البيت يبني شخصية الطفل أو يهدمها، .. اذا كانت شخصية طفلك ضعيفة، ماذا تعمل ‌‏هل شخصية طفلك ضعيفة يعني يتردد كثيرا، متساهل في حقوقه، يقوم بتصرفات لارضاء الناس على حساب نفسه، ‏ - ‏الأطفال بعد سن السابعة تكون نظرة والديهم لهم مهمة ولها تأثير كبير عليهم، - ‏اعلموا تصرفات طفلكم هي الفعل وتصرفاتكم هي رد الفعل…

Signed رحمک الله یا أبي

10 Nov 2026, 04:15 UTC1 viewsread 10 November 2026

🌿🤍 في حُبِّ الله ﷻ.. كلماتٌ تلامس القلب وتُذكِّر الروح بأن أجمل الأمنيات أن يرضى الله عنّا 🤍✨👇 t.me/sokoon012/23528 💎 اختار المحتوى اللي يشبه اهتماماتك!⬇️⬇️😍

Signed قائمة Ɲûナêℓℓᵃ المسائية ②

10 Nov 2026, 04:15 UTC1 viewsread 10 November 2026

🌿 دورات قرآنية وشرعية متكاملة تحفيظ • تجويد • إجازات • شهادات 👇🏻 t.me/AleayidunElaAllah/36724 🤍 كيف تتدبّر القرآن وتعيش مع آياته؟ مجلد يضم مواد عملية تعينك على تدبّر كتاب الله وتقوية صلتك به 👇🏻 t.me/addlist/5xMmaj2XV2U0ZWY0 ♻️ للاشتراك: @alfoursan55bot

Signed قائمة Ɲûナêℓℓᵃ المسائية ②

9 Nov 2026, 20:08 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026

"أتَخْنُقُنِي الحَيَاةُ وَ أنْتَ رَبِّي ؟! وَ أنْتَ اللَّهُ في ضَعفِي وَ كَربِي وَ أنْتَ اللَّهُ إنْ كَـثُـرَ ذنـبـي وَ غَابَ الطُّهرُ عَنْ قَلبي وَ دَربي 💔🥀

❤1

Signed رحمک الله یا أبي

9 Nov 2026, 20:08 UTC30 viewsread 10 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed رحمک الله یا أبي

9 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC2 viewsread 9 November 2026

📡تصميم فديو Aiالذكاء الاصطناعي🫵ادخل وشاهد ✔️ https://t.me/WafaTasmem 👌 لمن عجز عن تأديب أولاده 🌐 عليك بهذا الدعـاء👇⭐️ https://t.me/Kitabh_X_Sorh/882 .. 🔈🌷نصيحة لمن يشتكي 👈👈 من تفلت القرآن من صدره ويجد صعوبة في مراجعته..🥺💔 https://t.me/addlist/GXsamhZ69AwxMjRk ☀️دعم قوائم الخليج الإسلاميّة «عصرية» تـرحـب بــ🤝ـكم @yeeeo❤️

Signed الخليج الإسلامية#عصرية🌟

Showing the 12 most recent of 373 posts we hold for @eid7r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 20 posts on @eid7r as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📝 أقوال مأثورة لكبار العلماء 📚
@Aqwalalmakibar · 20,066
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 September 2026
سنابل الخير🌾🌾🌾
@sanabill · 43,910
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
روائع الصوتيات
@sawtiat2018 · 24,280
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
طمأنينة روح🌹
@lmddrt · 40,312
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
دُموع الخاشعين
@D_Alkhashyn · 25,385
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
ٱجمَـــل آﻟڪَلاَم
@Ajmal · 35,325
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
القران الكريم
@Algrenilkrem · 36,675
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026
قبسات من نور🌸
@rwath · 29,888
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
⤶ قناة طَلأب العَلم الشرعيَ📚
@AHALALALM · 19,733
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
المتنوعات الدّعويّة أكاديمية زين الإتقان
@zainaletqaan01 · 33,898
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
لعلكم تتقـون/ تفسير وتدبر و سنن
@acdemyzainaletqaan · 40,525
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
ادعيه ، قران ، اذكار , دعاء 🤲🏻
@ccvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv · 307,863
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
وَارِفَــة..
@mjrd_faragh_a · 25,318
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
حصاد التدبر 🕯️أفلا يتدبرون القرآن
@chbihiilham1 · 41,727
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
مؤسسة خزائن الرحمن العلمية
@khazayinsci · 18,528
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
الرّقية الشّرعيّة والحجامة بأكاديمية زين الإتقان العالمية
@Academyzainaletqaan04 · 38,013
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
القرآن الكريم والأذكار
@qurae · 19,936
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 September 2026
🌹 فـلتـزهـر حيـاتـك معـنا 🌹
@follah97 · 27,792
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
صدقة جارية 🌴
@sadaqa · 32,566
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
بَنفُسجٍي - ᵖᵘʳᵖˡᵉ🦩💜.
@PpAmera · 76,970
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
اٰبـٰ̲ـہرٰاٰرٰ 🪞🎀
@zad_alkhayr2 · 51,717
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
حالات وتصاميم مميزة♻️
@EFL1_Team · 75,066
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
🌟 عبارات من ذهب 🌟
@dfgbkh · 27,433
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
المحجة البيضاء
@Taeboon · 39,946
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💙 أطياف الرحيل_℡💙” (@eid7r), 8,304 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eid7r.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.