Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝖤𝖦𝖦𝖹𝖮 𝖭𝖤𝖶𝖲

@egzonews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,191subscribers

+104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296644144
TypeChannel
Username@egzonews
Created10 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/egzonews

Growth

7,0797,1917,1356 August 2026 — 7,087 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,087 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,090 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,079 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,191 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,062–7,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:047,191+112
10 Aug 2026, 04:117,079-11
7 Aug 2026, 07:447,090+3
6 Aug 2026, 14:307,087no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:237,087first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.73%
avg views ÷ 7,191 subscribers
Avg views / post
269
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held60 (6 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total16,113
Reactions total1,699
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 00s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,699 reactions across 60 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
65038.3%
😭40724.0%
🔥22713.4%
🍓19911.7%
💘19311.4%
🍾201.18%
🕊30.177%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,699reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

آپدیت‌های ویبو، توییتر و اینستاگرام استودیو ییشینگ با عکس‌های رئیس جذاب‌ـشون در فنمیتینگ هاربین 🫶🏼 ”از استیجی به استیج دیگه همدیگه رو میبینیم، از جوابی به جواب دیگه، ارتباطمون رو عمیق‌تر میکنیم. هر لحظه‌ی نزدیکی و صمیمیتی که با هم تجربه میکنیم، فصل تازه‌ای از داستان‌هامون رو مینویسه“ ⎘ 「 LINK • LINK 」 ‹ @egzonews | #weibo #twitter #instagram

5

11 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC93 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

چند تا عکس منتشر شده از ییشینگ عسل تو فنمیتینگ کوچولوی امروز استی‌لند برای فن‌های برنده وی‌آی‌پی در هاربین 🐚 ‹ @egzonews | #StayLandFanMeet

5

11 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC95 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

وای چقدر با این مدل موهای کوتاهش کیوت‌تر شده 🤏🏼 ‹ @egzonews | #StayLandFanMeet

4

11 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC88 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

تو یه قسمت از فنمیتینگ که پیام‌ها رو میخوند ییشینگ یکم با فن‌ها صحبت کردن و خوش گذروندن و اینجا هم داره میگه ”با وجود اینکه بیک‌ـرها ناخن‌های بلندی دارن ولی با این حال خیلی سریع تایپ میکنن“ 💅🏻😂 ‹ @egzonews | #StayLandFanMeet

4

11 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC97 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ییشینگ بیبی امروز یه فنمیتینگ اختصاصی و وی‌آی‌پی به اسم استی‌لند و بایوهیالوکس تو هاربین برگزار کرده بود و این فنمیتینگ کوچولو فقط مخصوص برنده‌های قرعه‌کشی برگزار شد برای همین خیلی فنکم منتشر نشد ! 💜 But You Don’t Know Me Stutter Love Smoke & Mirrors Flawed Crown Fragrance NAMANANA ییشینگ تو فنمیتینگ یه بخش رندوم دنس داشت و مشتاق بود فن‌ها با آهنگ‌هاش برقصن کیوت و میخواست تمرین کنن که بلد باشن و مثل اینکه تو کنسرت

4

9 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC448 views84 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‌― ⋅⋅ بیون‌بابل 🍓 ”برادرزاده‌های من خیلی بزرگ شدن، مگه نه؟! ㅎㅎ انگار فرشته‌های کوچولوی خوبین، انقدر پاک و معصومن..“ ”کاش زمان یکم آروم‌تر میگذشت! حس میکنم خیلی خیلی سریع داره میگذره ㅎㅎ ترسناکه ㅜㅜ“ ”این عکس رو مامانم گرفته! ㅎㅎ“ سویول و شیوو چقدر بزرگ‌ شدن واقعا 🫴🏼 ‹ @egzonews | #bubble

😭6212🍓7💘3

9 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC462 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

نکته جالب اینجاست که فن‌ها داشتن میگشتن ببینن که محل تیراندازی عکس بابل چانیول کجاست که این پست اریک از اعضای د بویز رو دیدن که دیروز گذاشته بود و حدس میزنن اون کسی که پشت سرشه چانیول باشه چون خیلی شبیهشه و لوکیشن هم یکیـه، حالا واسه همه سواله که باهم یه چیزی فیلمبـرداری کردن یا اتفاقی همزمان اونجا بودن؟ 👀 ‹ @egzonews | #fanaccount

😭2315🔥4🍾2

9 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC632 views54 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ببخشید این چیه؟؟ ای کاش کانتنت یا چیز بیشتری ازش بگیریم 🗣

😭37💘85🍾2🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC633 views63 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‌― ⋅⋅ یول‌بابل 🍒 *دو تا عکس میفرسته* ”الان آخر هفته‌‌‌امونه~“ ”فردا دوشنبه‌ست، فایتینگ!“ ‹ @egzonews | #bubble

😭3912🔥6💘5🍾1

9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC620 views64 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

دقت کردین چانیول همیشه بهمون میگه به چیزهای قشنگ دور و برمون نگاه کنیم؟ چه آسمون باشه، چه ماه یا گل‌ها و همیشه هم ازشون عکس میگیره و باهامون به اشتراک میذاره واقعا سوییت‌ترین و رمانتیک‌ترین پسری‌ـه که میشناسم 🥺 ”فقط وقتی چیزهای قشنگ رو ببینی خودت هم یه آدم قشنگی 🌸“ ”اگه یه چیز قشنگ ببینم، دلم میخواد براتون بفرستمش“ ”الان به آسمون نگاه کنین! خیلی قشنگه!“

😭40💘128🕊2🍓1🍾1

9 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC498 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‌― ⋅⋅ یول‌بابل 🍒 ”الان به آسمون نگاه کنین! خیلی قشنگه!“ *عکس میفرسته* ‹ @egzonews | #bubble

32😭9💘3🍾2

9 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC463 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

آهنگ زیبا و جذاب فید سهون موفق شد در چارت APMA برای بازه‌ی سوم تا نهم آگوست رتبه‌ی هفتم رو بدست بیاره، جوری که هیچ پروموتی نداشته ولی به راحتی وارد تاپ چارت‌های مختلف چین و کره شده همچنین منشن کنم آهنگ کال مای نیم جانگ ییشینگ‌ـمون هم رتبه‌ی دوم چارت رو داره ❤️‍🔥 1, Less than a Lover / JENNIE 2, Call My Name / LAY ZHANG 3, singasong / V8 (VERNON&THE8) 4, Do your dance / RIIZE 5, Ice Cream / YEONJUN 6, 99 Degrees / JA

🔥2911🍓2💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @egzonews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 232,549 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖤𝖦𝖦𝖹𝖮 𝖭𝖤𝖶𝖲” (@egzonews), 7,191 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egzonews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.