Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Госзаказ

Channel

Госзаказ

@egoszakupkiru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,200subscribers

-126 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001290805633
TypeChannel
Username@egoszakupkiru
Created12 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/egoszakupkiru

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,20013,32613,2637 August 2026 — 13,326 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,326 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,323 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,321 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,315 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,312 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,307 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,305 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,297 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,289 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,284 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,285 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,286 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,284 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,281 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,278 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,271 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,267 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,263 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,257 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,254 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,248 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,237 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,222 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,224 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,217 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,219 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,200 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 42 days, net -126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,181–13,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:4013,200-19
16 Sept 2026, 15:2213,219+2
14 Sept 2026, 17:1613,217-7
13 Sept 2026, 03:5713,224+2
11 Sept 2026, 06:3913,222-15
8 Sept 2026, 10:1713,237-11
5 Sept 2026, 08:1813,248-6
3 Sept 2026, 14:1713,254-3
2 Sept 2026, 10:4513,257-6
1 Sept 2026, 08:2613,263-4
31 Aug 2026, 07:3313,267-4
29 Aug 2026, 04:1713,271-7
27 Aug 2026, 01:4713,278-3
25 Aug 2026, 23:0213,281-3
24 Aug 2026, 23:2513,284-2
23 Aug 2026, 11:4713,286+1
22 Aug 2026, 01:5913,285+1
20 Aug 2026, 18:2313,284-5
19 Aug 2026, 16:0713,289-8
17 Aug 2026, 13:2613,297first reading

Engagement

151 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.30%
avg views ÷ 13,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
304
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.605%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 151 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held151 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total17,637
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3750.7%
🔥1824.7%
👍912.3%
😁68.22%
💔22.74%
💯11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC181 viewsread 2 September 2026

А вот и ответы на вопросы 1. Ответ на первый вопрос Г. По Закону № 427-ФЗ договор и акты хранятся 5 лет, по Закону № 44-ФЗ – не менее 6 лет со старта закупки. Поскольку второй срок длиннее, безопаснее применять именно его (не менее 6 лет), чтобы одновременно выполнить оба требования. Подробнее >>> 2. Ответ на второй вопрос Б. Дополнительное требование к опыту применяется обязательно, когда начальная цена контракта

2 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC198 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Закупка с полки: как быстро купить товар у едпоставщика и не раздробить закупку в пыль Малая электронная закупка по части 12 статьи 93, это та самая «закупка с полки»: быстро, через ЕИС и ЭТП, без ручного поиска поставщика и плясок вокруг дробления 🛒 Но работает она не для всего. Купить можно только товары, в том числе ПО, базы данных и лекарства. Работы и услуги, мимо кассы. Еще нужен КТРУ с характеристиками, инач

2 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC219 viewsread 2 September 2026

Как изменить контракт и не превратить допсоглашение в нарушение Иногда условия контракта уже не работают, а просто договориться с поставщиком недостаточно. Для изменения нужно законное основание и нормальное оформление, иначе допсоглашение может стать отдельной причиной для претензий на проверке. В новом материале собрали новые основания для изменения условий контракта, срочный алгоритм действий и готовые образцы д

2 Sept 2026, 06:00 UTC239 viewsread 2 September 2026

🔮 Минутка утренней магии. 2 сентября карта дня: Пятерка жезлов «Соперничество». Это карта борьбы, споров и движения через легкий хаос. Сегодня все могут что-то доказывать, тянуть в свою сторону и создавать ощущение, что день начался сразу с финального раунда. Главное — не превращать каждый рабочий вопрос в турнир на выживание. В обычной жизни Пятерка жезлов советует не лезть в лишние конфликты. Иногда победа — это

2 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC260 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Утречка! Пусть в вашей жизни будет опора, которая не даст вам упасть ☺️ Вне зависимости от того, как жизнь будет пытаться вас уронить) #юмор | 📌 Подписаться на Госзаказ | Читать нас в MAX

4🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC311 viewsread 2 September 2026

Новые поправки в 44-ФЗ: как не потерять деньги и не получить штраф Законодатели опять «упростили» закупки, а по факту — теперь вы рискуете остаться без экономии, без поставщика и с многотысячным штрафом. Сроки сжаты, критерии размыты, а ответственность выросла. Скачайте готовую таблицу «было/стало» с комментариями эксперта ФАС. Показали, где реальная польза, а где подводные камни. Разобрали замену страны происхожде

1 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC277 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

44-ФЗ с октября: новые правила, новые возможности и новые поводы не моргать С октября Закон № 44-ФЗ снова меняет настройки. Запрос котировок теперь можно проводить до 20 млн руб., а условия контракта менять шире, чем раньше. Закупочный мир решил: стабильность переоценена 🧩 Главное, не действовать по старой памяти. То, что раньше было нельзя, теперь может быть законным, например замена товара или страны происхождени

1 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC276 viewsread 2 September 2026

Охрана с 1 сентября: что срочно поправить в ТЗ и контракте Закупки охраны с 1 сентября переехали на новые правила. Частная охрана теперь требует больше документов, точных формулировок и внимания к объекту. Ну потому что просто нанять охранника было, видимо, слишком человечески 🚨 Перед закупкой надо проверить, можно ли вообще привлекать частную охрану на объект, приложить документ о праве владения, прописать правила

1 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC253 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Скачайте презентацию с вебинара! Вчера прошел вебинар по теме: «Закупки лекарств-2026: новые правила ЕИС, нацрежима и локализации» Редакция уже загрузила презентацию в бот Телеграма и Макса. Скачайте ее бесплатно. Запись этого и других вебинаров смотрите тут >>>> #полезное | 📌 Подписаться на Госзаказ | Читать нас в MAX

Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @egoszakupkiru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГИС ЕИС ЗАКУПКИ
@gis_eiszakupki · 89,769
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Закупки и тендеры по 44-ФЗ, 223-ФЗ
@zakupki44fz · 48,891
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
РТС-тендер
@rtstenderinfo · 25,204
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
ГИС ТОРГИ ПРОДАЖИ
@gis_torgi_prodaji · 24,576
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Госзаказ” (@egoszakupkiru), 13,200 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egoszakupkiru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.