Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Козлова для ПСИХОЛОГОВ 🐐

@ego_psycho

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,353subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002128630819
TypeChannel
Username@ego_psycho
DescriptionКанал для профессиональных психологов и неравнодушных к научной психологии 👉🏻псих.разборы; 👉🏻методики, литература, материалы для работы психолога; Для связи: @linalazur
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ego_psycho

Growth

1,3537 Aug 2026, 14:03 — 1,353 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:21 — 1,353 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:037 Aug 2026, 22:21
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,352–1,354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 22:211,353no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:031,353first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
439
Videos
105
Links
81

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 04s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2924.8%
👍2823.9%
2723.1%
custom 52221417804760461091512.8%
😱97.69%
💯43.42%
custom 587978513273009555321.71%
21.71%
custom 544737253265298591810.855%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ego_psycho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 08:17 UTC366 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня классический вуайеризм всё чаще приобретает цифровые формы. Вместо наблюдения из окна используются скрытые камеры, запись в раздевалках, примерочных или общественных туалетах, съёмка под одеждой без согласия человека («апскёртинг»), взлом веб-камер, а также распространение полученных материалов в интернете. Для человека с подобным расстройством технология обычно играет второстепенную роль: источник сексуальн

👍6custom 522214178047604610932

12 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC332 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Причины вуайеризма Единой причины пока не существует. Исследователи обсуждают сочетание нескольких факторов: особенности формирования сексуального поведения, нарушения контроля импульсов, ранний опыт, закрепление возбуждения через повторение определённого сценария и трудности с построением близких отношений. В литературе также описывается сочетание вуайеризма с другими парафилиями, прежде всего эксгибиционизмом и фр

👍31

12 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC296 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

МКБ 10 и МКБ 11 С точки зрения современной клинической психологии и психиатрии, диагноз ставится далеко не каждому человеку, который подсматривает в окно. В МКБ-10 вуайеризм входит в рубрику F65.3 «Вуайеризм» из группы расстройств сексуального предпочтения. В МКБ-11 подход стал ещё более строгим: диагноз устанавливается при устойчивом сексуальном возбуждении от наблюдения за человеком, который не давал согласия на эт

👍32custom 522214178047604610921

12 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC245 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сам термин «вуайеризм» (от французского voir — «видеть») вошёл в психиатрическую литературу в конце XIX века. Одним из первых систематически описал это явление немецкий психиатр Рихард фон Крафт-Эбинг в знаменитой книге «Половая психопатия» (Psychopathia Sexualis, 1886). Позже тему развивали Зигмунд Фрейд, рассматривавший стремление к наблюдению как одну из форм «скопофилии» («удовольствия от смотрения»), а во второй

3👍3🔥21

12 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC259 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_novostiPhoto

В Перми мужчина в бинокль следит за девушками из соседних домов, утверждают очевидцы. Местная жительница Виктория рассказала «Осторожно, новости», что около недели назад соседка пожаловалась на мужчину, который наблюдает за ней из окна дома на Макарова с помощью бинокля. По словам жильцов, неизвестный наблюдает за девушками каждый день. «Я тоже его спалила прямо в начале его наблюдения, как он окно открывал и усажи

1

12 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC263 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍿Увидела новость. Обсудим феномен вуайеризма? 🔍

👍3🔥2

9 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC336 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🍸Интересная непсихологическая теория, друзья Подозреваю, что вы (также как и я) воротите нос от сгенерированных текстов. Они вылизаны до блеска, изуродованы простотой и отдают пластиковым вкусом. И что я имею сказать.. в будущем будет роскошью общение с живым человеком, чтение его мыслей и понятно сформулированная речь, не лишенная души. Мы полюбим орфографические ошибки, а косноязычие станет показателем авторского

14💯4👍2😱2custom 52221417804760461091

8 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC384 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Этот плакат - хорошая иллюстрация перцептивного научения. Первые секунды наш взгляд видит набор символов. Затем мозг 🧠 находит закономерности, создаёт новую систему распознавания, и чтение становится почти автоматическим. Интересно, что автор постепенно усложняет задачу, уменьшая размер символов. Однако вместе с опытом растут и возможности восприятия. Именно поэтому грамотное обучение всегда строится по принципу пос

👍8custom 52221417804760461093🔥2custom 54473725326529859181

8 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC434 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Gpt не смог прочитать этот текст. А вы?)

🔥12custom 522214178047604610941

8 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC369 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, напоминаю этот канал есть в МАХ. Там все материалы, анонсы и дополнительный контент. 🫂

3

8 Jul 2026, 05:29 UTC327 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🧠 Необычный факт из психиатрии. Исследователи уже несколько десятилетий изучают удивительный феномен: у людей, родившихся полностью слепыми, шизофрения встречается исключительно редко. Считается, что особенности развития мозга с первых дней жизни могут снижать вероятность развития этого расстройства, хотя точный механизм пока остаётся неизвестным. 📚 Источник

🔥11custom 52221417804760461092custom 58797851327300955532

3 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC468 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какое место примерно занимает Россия в мире по уровню смертности от суицида?

  1. Входит в первую тройку стран20%
  2. Входит в первую десятку стран54%
  3. Входит в топ 50 стран26%
  4. Входит в топ 100 стран0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😱7

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ego_psycho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz132 voters

Какое место примерно занимает Россия в мире по уровню смертности от суицида?

  1. Входит в первую тройку стран20%
  2. Входит в первую десятку стран54%
  3. Входит в топ 50 стран26%
  4. Входит в топ 100 стран0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 12 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Козлова для ПСИХОЛОГОВ 🐐” (@ego_psycho), 1,353 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ego_psycho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.