Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ◦┆— 𝑬𝑔𝑔𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛'𝑠 𝑵𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠.

Channel

◦┆— 𝑬𝑔𝑔𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛'𝑠 𝑵𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠.

@eggchannotes_GN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003944856026
TypeChannel
Username@eggchannotes_GN
Created11 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eggchannotes_GN

Growth

1114 Aug 2026, 12:16 — 11 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 00:05 — 11 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 12:1615 Aug 2026, 00:05
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:0511no change
14 Aug 2026, 12:1611first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5258156537246939405733.3%
custom 5242413003910970548628.6%
custom 5429095896325299925523.8%
custom 524258264652923142829.52%
custom 525812883900284787114.76%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC26 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

//Сапп:Хотел сообщить что я вышел из сетки, но оставлю этот канал для лучших времён <;D

custom 52581565372469394052

12 Jun 2026, 20:03 UTC47 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🥹🥹{🤩}🥹𝒀𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑖𝑡, 𝑖 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑠. 🤩😀🍆🦄📀🐈🥑🧦🌰🧦🤪😀🤩 ⎯_ฺ ֺ 𝒮 ִ ⭐️⭐️ ⏜ׄ‌꯭۫ 𐀶 .ִ۫ ⁠⁠⁠ +❤🔠о как он попал в ПК.❤ #️⃣:: 🔤ггчан оказывается в ПК во время серии 1000 Players Simulate UNDERGROUND Civilization in Minecraft. 🔤осле того как Цивилизация Арахнида выкупила его как пленника у невидимого ассасина, а после посадила в камеру, у Эгга не было особого занятия. Большую часть времени он проводил зате

custom 52424130039109705484custom 52581565372469394052custom 54290958963252999252custom 52425826465292314281

12 Jun 2026, 19:56 UTC44 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🌟{👁}•꒰𝑾𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚.╭ׄ╫݂─╴⚒️.𔓕 ࣪ 𐴒⃔𐴂࣪𝀊 ׅ ⢾ ࣪⎯⎯‌‌ ׅ 💉┆◦𐔌💀 𐦯 . 𞥊 ︩︪ ִᤳ 𝅄 ⭐️⭐️𝂅 𒄬 𓈒 ִ۫🤩 {🪽}—𝑺𝑜 𝑢ℎ, 𝑚𝑦 𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑬𝒈𝒈𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑬𝒈𝒈. 𝑁𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢, 𝐼 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑠. 🪽📚🪽꒰  ࣭   ࣪ 𖥔 ʾ𝅄 . 𓎟𓎟‌‌‌ ׄ ꒱︶ׄ︶ִׄ︶ ::𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒'𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑝.𝄀 𝅥 ۫⠀๑⠀ ִ𝅥 𝄀 ۫⠀𔓕 ⠀ ִ⠀ 𓆩꒰◦ 𝑂𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑠 .୧ 𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑝 ୧˚𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑏𝑜𝑥 𝑅𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠 ◦꒱ .. 𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡'𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑙, 𝑦𝑒𝑎ℎ.۪ ׄ⊱ ໑୧ ׅ 𖥔ׄ ׂ ‹‹...{💀} 𝑨𝒖𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒓 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒃𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓:—@k3nnyX_137

custom 52581565372469394053custom 54290958963252999253custom 52424130039109705482custom 52425826465292314281custom 52581288390028478711

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @eggchannotes_GN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 804,963 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“◦┆— 𝑬𝑔𝑔𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛'𝑠 𝑵𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠.” (@eggchannotes_GN), 11 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eggchannotes_GN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.