здравствуйте! поступила на бюджет на географический в мгу🎉🎉🎉🎉

Channel
Отзывы! Отзывы!
@egevikarezultat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001751834145 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @egevikarezultat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/egevikarezultat |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 2 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 300.0%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 72
- Videos
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Виктория, добрый день! Ещё раз хочу поблагодарить вас! Иван студент бюджета Бауманки! Все получилось у него, как задумал!
Photo, posted without a caption
Делюсь радостью! У нас с Катей (она большущая молодец и трудяга) получилось из вечной четверки сделать пятерку на ОГЭ и заполучить желанный красный аттестат. Мечты должны сбываться! Ура! Ещё раз поздравляю Катю 🥰
Photo, posted without a caption
Виктория, добрый день! Спасибо вам большое за вашу работу. Лиза сдала на 83 балла, и это прям очень круто, так как у нее русский - это самый больной предмет. Выше 3 она никогда не писала работы, а сочинения - были пыткой. Но вы выстроили отличную систему, благодаря которой у ребенка отложились все знания по полочкам. И конечно ваша поддержка и вовлечённость на уроках и за их пределами - дорогого стоит!!! Буду рекоме…
Кроме невероятно сильной базы, которую Вы даете, для меня очень ценным было Ваше доброжелательное и даже трепетное отношение к детям. Огромное спасибо за это!!! Дочь закончила 5 класс, буду мега счастлива, если на подготовку к огэ и ЕГЭ сможем попасть к Вам ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Дорогая Виктория! Огромное спасибо за проделанную работу! Невероятно благодарна за то спокойствие, в котором я и Тимофей пребывали весь год подготовки к экзамену. Когда вышел с экзамена, сказал, что придется на пересдачу пойти: паниковал сильно (прям не мог понять, есть ли такое слово «Горошика» и есть ли в русском языке слово «шторм»😳. Но благодаря тому, что за год у него была выстроена отличная база и устаканился ш…
Виктория спасибо большое вам за год проведенный с нашими ребятами. Результат у сына не самый удачный, но совершенно точно это его заслуга. Я не встречала таких радеющих за свое дело педагогов. Вы очень отзывчивый доброжелательный и ответственный наставник! Очень рады были сотрудничеству 🔥
хочу Вам выразить огромную благодарность за подготовку к егэ по русскому! спасибо за поддержку на протяжении года, за понятные объяснения, за то, что привили любовь к русскому!) для ребят - следуйте алгоритму! не переживайте из-за результатов егкр(у меня было 69 максимум, егэ написала на 83), обязательно делайте работу над ошибками вместе с Викторией Александровной) мне безумно понравилась платформа на геткурсе, очен…
Хочу выразить благодарность Виктории за отличную подготовку к ЕГЭ. Итог 86 баллов! Занимался сын полгода.Занятия были очень структурированными, материал объяснялся понятно и доступно, а сложные темы разбирались до полного понимания. Особенно понравилось, что преподаватель поддерживает, при этом всегда дает четкую обратную связь и полезные рекомендации по сочинению и тестовой части. Благодаря этой подготовке сын науч…
отзыв о курсе в записи: зимний пробник был на 68; смотрел уроки в записи, сочинения отправлял на проверку; результат 83 балла; удобно, что можно работать в своём темпе, весь материал структурирован и подробно объясняется с примерами; Вика всегда на связи и очень поддерживает! спасибо 🩷
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @egevikarezultat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 120,115 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы! Отзывы!” (@egevikarezultat), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egevikarezultat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.