Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы! Отзывы!

Channel

Отзывы! Отзывы!

@egevikarezultat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001751834145
TypeChannel
Username@egevikarezultat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/egevikarezultat

Growth

210 August 2026 — 2 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:162no change
10 Aug 2026, 12:302first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
300.0%
avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20258 August 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
72
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC6 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

здравствуйте! поступила на бюджет на географический в мгу🎉🎉🎉🎉

6 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC4 viewsread 13 August 2026

Виктория, добрый день! Ещё раз хочу поблагодарить вас! Иван студент бюджета Бауманки! Все получилось у него, как задумал!

26 Jun 2026, 06:53 UTC15 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @vikaegePhoto

Делюсь радостью! У нас с Катей (она большущая молодец и трудяга) получилось из вечной четверки сделать пятерку на ОГЭ и заполучить желанный красный аттестат. Мечты должны сбываться! Ура! Ещё раз поздравляю Катю 🥰

18 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC19 viewsread 13 August 2026

Виктория, добрый день! Спасибо вам большое за вашу работу. Лиза сдала на 83 балла, и это прям очень круто, так как у нее русский - это самый больной предмет. Выше 3 она никогда не писала работы, а сочинения - были пыткой. Но вы выстроили отличную систему, благодаря которой у ребенка отложились все знания по полочкам. И конечно ваша поддержка и вовлечённость на уроках и за их пределами - дорогого стоит!!! Буду рекоме

18 Jun 2026, 11:16 UTC18 viewsread 13 August 2026

Кроме невероятно сильной базы, которую Вы даете, для меня очень ценным было Ваше доброжелательное и даже трепетное отношение к детям. Огромное спасибо за это!!! Дочь закончила 5 класс, буду мега счастлива, если на подготовку к огэ и ЕГЭ сможем попасть к Вам ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

18 Jun 2026, 11:16 UTC18 viewsread 13 August 2026

Дорогая Виктория! Огромное спасибо за проделанную работу! Невероятно благодарна за то спокойствие, в котором я и Тимофей пребывали весь год подготовки к экзамену. Когда вышел с экзамена, сказал, что придется на пересдачу пойти: паниковал сильно (прям не мог понять, есть ли такое слово «Горошика» и есть ли в русском языке слово «шторм»😳. Но благодаря тому, что за год у него была выстроена отличная база и устаканился ш

18 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026

Виктория спасибо большое вам за год проведенный с нашими ребятами. Результат у сына не самый удачный, но совершенно точно это его заслуга. Я не встречала таких радеющих за свое дело педагогов. Вы очень отзывчивый доброжелательный и ответственный наставник! Очень рады были сотрудничеству 🔥

18 Jun 2026, 04:29 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026

хочу Вам выразить огромную благодарность за подготовку к егэ по русскому! спасибо за поддержку на протяжении года, за понятные объяснения, за то, что привили любовь к русскому!) для ребят - следуйте алгоритму! не переживайте из-за результатов егкр(у меня было 69 максимум, егэ написала на 83), обязательно делайте работу над ошибками вместе с Викторией Александровной) мне безумно понравилась платформа на геткурсе, очен

18 Jun 2026, 04:25 UTC15 viewsread 13 August 2026

Хочу выразить благодарность Виктории за отличную подготовку к ЕГЭ. Итог 86 баллов! Занимался сын полгода.Занятия были очень структурированными, материал объяснялся понятно и доступно, а сложные темы разбирались до полного понимания. Особенно понравилось, что преподаватель поддерживает, при этом всегда дает четкую обратную связь и полезные рекомендации по сочинению и тестовой части. Благодаря этой подготовке сын науч

17 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC14 viewsread 13 August 2026

отзыв о курсе в записи: зимний пробник был на 68; смотрел уроки в записи, сочинения отправлял на проверку; результат 83 балла; удобно, что можно работать в своём темпе, весь материал структурирован и подробно объясняется с примерами; Вика всегда на связи и очень поддерживает! спасибо 🩷

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @egevikarezultat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 120,115 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы! Отзывы!” (@egevikarezultat), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egevikarezultat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.