Channel
@efimen_colife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,316subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001584400271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @efimen_colife |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/efimen_colife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 4,316 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 4,314 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:10 | 4,315 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 4,316 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 4,316 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
327 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 160 | 48.9% | |
| 😁 | 86 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 24.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 327reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот вам последняя неочевидная мысль на сегодня: от рождения здоровому человеку НИКОГДА В ЖИЗНИ в голову не придет идея заниматься биохакингом или вести здоровый образ жизни Зачем? Пьешь, куришь, ешь че хочешь, а самочувствие прекрасное. И родители этого человека, которые дали ему такую генетику, тоже никогда не занимались своим здоровьем и никогда не болели Здоровый человек не расскажет вам, как стать здоровым. Чем…
❤20🔥5😁2
Это очень важная логическа ошибка, на которую иногда попадаюсь и сам. Когда мы измеряем возраст "до 80", "до 90", то это сравнение человека с другими людьми. ОЧЕНЬ РАЗНЫМИ людьми, которые жили в разных условиях Единственный показатель, который должен меня волновать – сколько дополнительных лет качественной жизни мне даст биохакинг? Потому что кто-то пьет, курит и доживет до 50. А кто-то (ну например Я) не пьет, не к…
❤7🔥6😁3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🔥2😁2
Бессмертная классика
❤6🔥1😁1
Как и говорится всегда и вроде слышал эту фразу на вашем канале Дмитрий, что "нет здоровых людей, есть только плохо обследованные"
❤6🔥1😁1
Я постоянно получаю комментарий "У меня дед в деревне пил, купил, жил 99 лет без всякого твоего биохакинга" А теперь представьте сколько бы жил этот дед, если бы не пил, не курил, следил за собой и сдавал анализы? Я конечно не Брайан Джонсон, но у меня один из самых обследованных организмов на планете. Точно также находил и диффузный гастрит, и Синдром Жильбера и дырявый кишечник и чего только нет у меня, целая сер…
❤14🔥9😁1
Обратите внимание на злорадство людей, когда появляются какие-то новости про Брайана Джонсона: Потратил 2 млн $ на здоровье и продление молодости? Да у меня дед лучше выглядит Тратит всё свободное время на процедуры? Да Я пива бахну, стресс сброшу и то здоровее буду Брайан написал в твиттер отчет, что нашел причину отклонений в анализах – аутоимунный гастрит (не такое уж и редкое заболевание, кстати). И тут все нов…
❤17🔥2😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3😁2🔥1
>записал видео про успешные тесты >на голове сидит тонна мошкары Но реально не покусали и на лицо не садились, первый раз погулял спокойно Да, так и происходит тестирование всех гипотез на себе…
😁23🔥7❤4
Наука: можно, пока не вышло исследование, что нельзя Биохакинг как его вижу Я: ПРЕВЕНТИВНО не употребляем то, что даже потенциально может нанести вред + изучаем все исследования + смотрим практику, потому что половина исследований куплены нужным спонсором 100 лет назад люди че только не делали, и свинцовой краской одежду пропитывали, и из урановых стаканов пили "для здоровья" под довольное улюлюкание врачей со свеж…
❤16🔥9😁8
Если уж и хотите попить газировку, выбирайте варианты с САХАРОМ, если у вас нет диабета или преддиабетного состояния. Это гораздо менее вредно, что подсластители, синтезированные из нефти
😁9🔥7❤6
Состав Sugar Free ред була с картинки: Газированная вода, подсластители (ацесульфам калия, аспартам), регуляторы кислотности (лимонная кислота, гидрокарбонат натрия,карбонат магния), таурин (400мг/100мл), кофеин (32мг/100мл), витамины (ниацин, пантотеновая кислота, В6, В12), ароматизаторы,загуститель (ксантановая камедь), красители (сахарный колер I простой, рибофлавин). Содержит источник фенилаланина Аспартам (E95…
❤11😁5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @efimen_colife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 689,984 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ефименко про биохакинг” (@efimen_colife), 4,316 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/efimen_colife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.