Channel
@eekseye_art
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
906subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001550463573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eekseye_art |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eekseye_art |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 906 | -2 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 908 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 910 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 914 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 912 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 916 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 918 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 918 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
187 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 43.3% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 21.9% | |
| 🎃 | 14 | 7.49% | |
| custom 5373103262385848683 | 12 | 6.42% | |
| 😢 | 12 | 6.42% | |
| custom 5469884723994050951 | 11 | 5.88% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 5.35% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.14% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.07% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я люблю реалити-шоу! А ещЁ люблю Вархаммер, и много лет собирал и красил миниатюры. И вчера на ютубе мне подвернулась идеальная комбинация - реалити-шоу про покраску миниатюр! Посмотрите, вдруг еще кто-то такое любит 😍 https://youtu.be/j5z5FIN9F7o
❤4custom 54698847239940509512🎃1
Дополненная и улучшенная версия! А главное - функциональная, в отличие от предыдущей. Проголодались? 😋
❤8🔥3🎃1
В 2006 году я присоединился к группе #Theosophy в качестве клавишника. Нехилый срок, да? 😳 С тех пор мы вместе играли, катались с концертами по городам Сибири, а потом я переехал в Питер. В Сибирь наведывался редко, но мы всЁ равно продолжали выпускать совместные альбомы, выступали, когда я приезжал погостить, а однажды даже отправились в гастрольный тур по Европе. Затем я уехал в Грузию, и с тех пор мы ни разу не вы…
🔥6custom 53731032623858486833🍌2❤1🎃1🤩1custom 54698847239940509511
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4custom 54698847239940509512custom 53731032623858486831
Скоро выходит Control Resonant. Я его уже предзаказал и очень жду. А вчера Remedy опубликовали официальный косплей гайд на Дилана Фейдена, протагониста новой части. Ну а я запилил вам бесплатную модельку брелочка, который фигурирует в этом гайде ⭐️
❤5🍌3custom 53731032623858486832🎃1custom 54698847239940509511
Я закончил! Лепить волосы по-прежнему мучение, научите, а?
❤14custom 53731032623858486833🎃1
Video, posted without a caption
❤13🍌4🔥3🎃1custom 53731032623858486831custom 54698847239940509511
О, чо нашЁл! На заре увлечения Вархаммером ещЁ в раннюю эру перехода к смартфонам я замоддил свою раскладушку в оркофон, и даже не в ущерб ни единому функциональному элементу телефона ) Круто же?)
❤18🔥8😁2🎃1
Оу ноооу! Смотрю Ван Пис и, вдруг, закончились серии в той озвучке, в которой я посмотрел первые 280 серий! Как быть-то теперь?! 😭
😢12🎃1
Внимание, друзья! 💀 Мы меняем вектор разработки, и теперь Shatterlight - это бумер-шутер от первого лица! 😞 Спасибо за внимание! 👹
🔥7❤2😁2🎃1
У моего любимого Alan Wake годовщина выхода первой части 🔦 В честь этого решил воссоздать свой любимый шот из трейлера AW2, используя ассеты и главную героиню из Shatterlight. Давно меня преследовала эта идея, а вот и повод еЁ воплотить! Провозился с ним почти всю ночь, а это гораздо дольше, чем планировал, но результатом доволен ❤️ Реф оставлю в комментариях
❤8🔥2🎃1
Давно у нас не было этой рубрики. Вчера прошЁл демку REPLACED. Невероятно стилЁвая и атмосферная штука с обалденным освещением и звуком. По какой-то причине я не большой фанат киберпанка как жанра, но конкретно эта игра заслуживает внимания. Играется оч приятно, смотрится красиво. Полностью оправдывает свой миллион вишлистов в стиме. Вся демка проходится за 20 минут и однозначно стоит того. Не пожалейте времени и поп…
🔥8🎃3❤2custom 53731032623858486831custom 54698847239940509511
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @eekseye_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EEKSEYE” (@eekseye_art), 906 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eekseye_art.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.