"This movie is better than The Dark Knight" via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7zhl8/this_movie_is_better_than_the_dark_knight/?utm_source=ifttt

Channel
/r/sbubby
@eeffreef
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
7subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001354108228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eeffreef |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eeffreef |
Topic
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 7 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 8 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 9 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:20 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Pat Bateman via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t83i7j/pat_bateman/?utm_source=ifttt
Huh, that's a bit odd... via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7z6cj/huh_thats_a_bit_odd/?utm_source=ifttt
This looks very familiar via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t80wlo/this_looks_very_familiar/?utm_source=ifttt
Huh, that's a bit odd... via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7z6cj/huh_thats_a_bit_odd/?utm_source=ifttt
Tastes like burning via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7zgxn/tastes_like_burning/?utm_source=ifttt
JB again via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7ynkm/jb_again/?utm_source=ifttt
Halo infinite via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7uk7f/halo_infinite/?utm_source=ifttt
Gooble: the new funny meme! (Warning: very funny) via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7l6ms/gooble_the_new_funny_meme_warning_very_funny/?utm_source=ifttt
The true story of a real fake via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7lhia/the_true_story_of_a_real_fake/?utm_source=ifttt
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. All the cannoli. via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7kivl/leave_the_gun_take_the_cannoli_all_the_cannoli/?utm_source=ifttt
r/weeatbees via /r/sbubby https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/t7leku/rweeatbees/?utm_source=ifttt
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eeffreef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“/r/sbubby” (@eeffreef), 7 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eeffreef.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.