Channel
@editornoteschannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,059subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001932039579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @editornoteschannel |
| Description | Добавим штрихи вашей речи! Фразеологизмы, грамматика и многое другое у нас на канале, подписывайся! @pishiii_suda_da_bot — быстрая связь и мгновенные ответы в любое время. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/editornoteschannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 5,059 | +29 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 5,030 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 5,028 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,462 |
| Reactions total | 143 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
143 reactions across 27 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 15 | 10.5% | |
| 🤷 | 14 | 9.79% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 8.39% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 6.99% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 6.29% | |
| 😘 | 9 | 6.29% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 4.90% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.20% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 4.20% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.20% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 3.50% | |
| 🎄 | 5 | 3.50% | |
| 😇 | 5 | 3.50% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 2.80% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 2.80% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.80% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.10% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.10% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 8 further kinds | 12 | 8.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сладость с французским акцентом 🍫 Этот пост — о пралине. Так называют густую смесь из жареных и измельчённых орехов, какао-семян, сахарной пудры и молока. Чаще всего её используют как начинку для конфет и пирожных. А иногда — так называют саму конфету или плитку шоколада с такой начинкой. 🍫 У слова «пралине» два возможных происхождения. Согласно одному, оно пришло из французского языка, где глагол praliner означает…
📈 Маркетинг — это искусство и наука одновременно! Как продвигать бизнес с максимальной отдачей узнаешь на канале Кубик маркетолога. 🚀 Подписывайся и будь всегда на шаг впереди конкурентов!
🎄1
Если вы тоже мечтаете на миг исчезнуть из новостной суеты и городской гонки — загляните в блог Зяблики в роще. Его создала Олеся — человек, для которого мир не абстракция, а стиль жизни. Она ищет аутентичные рецепты по свету, привозит идеи из путешествий, выращивает цветы, собирает винтажную посуду и умеет видеть вдохновение в простом. Здесь вы найдёте не просто красивые снимки, а настоящие кулинарные находки: ⚫️ …
🍾2
Чекпойнт: как правильно и что значит? 📍 Заглянем в орфографический словарь — пишется слитно, через й: чекпойнт. Неверные варианты: чекпоинт, чек-пойнт, чек поинт и подобные. 📍 По смыслу — это контрольная точка: промежуточный этап, на котором можно оценить прогресс или при необходимости откатиться к сохранённому состоянию. Часто используется в проектах, работе с данными, тестировании. 📍 Слово пришло из английского …
⚡4😘4
Отличная расшифровка аббревиатуры 😅 @zapiski_redaktorki Словесный лабиринт
👌3
На волне знаний: разбираем всё, что связано с яхтой ⛵️ Отправляемся в морское плавание — тема сегодняшнего дня: яхта. Начнём с происхождения слова. Оно пришло из нидерландского языка — от глагола *jagen*, что означает «гнать». Слово *jacht* изначально обозначало быстроходное судно для погони. ⛵️ Тех, кто управляет яхтой, называют яхтсменами и яхтсменками. По размеру яхты делятся на категории: макси-яхта — крупная, …
🤔4
🔍 Ты любишь разгадывать загадки? Если да, то канал "Научные загадки" создан именно для тебя! Мы публикуем самые интересные и увлекательные факты, которые заставят твой ум работать на полную мощность. Изучай удивительные явления природы, необычные научные открытия и загадки вселенной. Присоединяйся и разгадывай самые захватывающие научные тайны с нами!
🎄4🦄4❤1🤩1
«Без преувеличения»: когда нужны запятые? 📝 Сочетание «без преувеличения» может быть вводным — тогда оно оценивает степень достоверности высказывания. Оно не связано грамматически с предложением, интонационно выделяется и может быть опущено без потери смысла. В этом случае обособляем запятыми: • Без преувеличения, это один из лучших любовных романов. • Коля, без всяких преувеличений, глядел на Олю с восхищением. 📝…
🤬3🥰2
В целом — да, но не так просто. Иногда за этим «да» скрывается усталость, лень или попытка избежать конфликта. А иногда — искреннее согласие, почти без оговорок. Главное — понимать, где что. Потому что «в целом» может стать удобной лазейкой для небрежности. А может — началом честного разговора. @zapiski_redaktorki Словесный лабиринт
🤣6
На чеку или начеку? 🤔 «Начеку» — это наречие, пишется слитно. В предложении выполняет роль обстоятельства или сказуемого. В первом случае его можно заменить словами «настороже, наготове», во втором — оно означает «в состоянии действовать». • В новой компании держусь начеку. • Пожарные всегда начеку (= наготове). Фраза «быть начеку» восходит к праславянскому глаголу *чекать* — «ждать». Буквально — «быть на страже».…
🤬7
Ой! @zapiski_redaktorki Словесный лабиринт
❤10
Азбука здоровья: от БАДа до ЭКГ МРТ по ОМС, курс БАДов для ЗОЖ и срочная ЭКГ — звучит как шифр, но это просто аббревиатуры. За каждой — важная часть заботы о себе. Мы собрали подборку из нового словаря, чтобы разобраться, как правильно говорить. 💊 БАД — биологически активная добавка. Слово склоняется и может быть мужского или женского рода: • *дорогой БАД, без дорогого БАДа* • *новая БАД, без новой БАД* 💊 ДМС — д…
😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @editornoteschannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 217,153 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@editornoteschannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Словесный лабиринт” (@editornoteschannel), 5,059 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editornoteschannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.