Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 64 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 441–460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 00:00
443
-1
30 Sept 2026, 15:59
444
-3
15 Sept 2026, 15:39
447
-1
7 Sept 2026, 09:56
448
-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:46
451
-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:08
454
-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:50
458
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:59
458
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
41
50.0%
🔥
25
30.5%
🥰
6
7.32%
👍
3
3.66%
😍
3
3.66%
😱
3
3.66%
😁
1
1.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2023 to 27 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
488
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
653
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
aleitora
1
5 June 2023
5 June 2023
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2023 to 27 November 2023. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Livro inspirado em Detroit Become Human? É o novo lançamento do Catarse da FLYVE
"Healing: A Última Esperança" conta a história de Sara e sua filha Vanessa, de só 9 anos, após um acidente radioativo que colocou todo mundo em risco.
Elas têm um baú estilo baú de pandora, cheio de segredos, que me deixou maluco enquanto lia. Certeza que vai te deixar também!!!!
O projeto já está no catarse aceitando apoios a partir d…
E além dos super descontos e do cupom, cada livro que você comprar hoje te dá direito a mais um livro GRÁTIS. O livro grátis é surpresa, escolhido e enviado por nós sem qualquer custo extra
A FLYVE voltou para o Catarse com um lançamento do autor Carlos Mamam
Dessa vez a fantasia O Forte de Ferro, continuação de O Início do Fim, pode ser apoiada em catarse.me/o_forte_de_ferro
A capa ficou linda e dá pra comprar os dois pela campanha com preço promocional e brindes incluídos.
Minha sugestão pra quem não conhece a série é apoiar com o Combo Livro 1 + Livro 2 + kit completo
Olha quanta coisa vem no kit:
-…
Novidade gente. Decidimos trazer uma nova abordagem para o projeto Voe
Deixei em tópicos pra ficar mais fácil de entender o projeto!
- Publicação dos livros de graça
- Royalties de até 70%
- Publicação de físico e e-book
- Capa, revisão, diagramação e registros
- Envio para influenciadores
- Impulsionamento durante a pré-venda
- Divulgação nas mídias da editora
- Brindes grátis para os leitores
Nossa ideia é contin…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @editoraflyve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flyve - Vem voar com a gente!” (@editoraflyve), 443 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/editoraflyve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.