Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 「𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡_𝑑𝑖𝑦𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑟ℎ」

Channel

「𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡_𝑑𝑖𝑦𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑟ℎ」

@edit_diyanarh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

30subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001491200797
TypeChannel
Username@edit_diyanarh
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 22 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/edit_diyanarh

Growth

3032317 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 02:5930-1
23 Aug 2026, 06:4931-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:1732no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:2432first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

1 Dec 2022, 10:05 UTC605 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @diyana_cl

چنل ناشناس✨ @unkoown_cl

28 Oct 2022, 17:07 UTC660 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @diyana_clPhoto

برای سفارش پروف به چنل زیر برید و پیام پین ناشناس -آوا پیام بدید!🤍✨ -بدون‌هیچ‌شرایطی!🧸💗 @unkoown_cl

19 Mar 2022, 10:25 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

بهترین تیک تاکر دختر ۱۴۰۰؟

  1. رکسانا28%
  2. نگین فضلی21%
  3. نیکا فلاحی42%
  4. دیانا رحیمی60%
  5. آتوسا7%
  6. مدیسا7%
  7. مهدیس8%
  8. نوشین1%
  9. باران2%
  10. رعنا2%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Dec 2021, 11:29 UTC≈2,430 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/Unknowndiyana خبرایی تو راهه🌚☘

16 Oct 2021, 11:58 UTC≈3,260 viewsread 11 August 2026

#پایان‌فعالیت قوی‌تربرمیگردیم!

6 Oct 2021, 12:20 UTC≈3,620 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗳|پروف -برای‌ادیتاتون🙇🏻‍♀💗 𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝘆🙅🏻‍♀ 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻:@edit_diyanarh

6 Oct 2021, 12:19 UTC≈3,120 viewsread 11 August 2026

#𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲|کادر -منبع:پینترست🫐🥤 -برای‌ادیتاتون🙇🏻‍♀💗 𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗼𝗽𝘆🙅🏻‍♀ 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻:@edit_diyanarh

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @edit_diyanarh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Mar 2022, 10:25 UTCFinal Results12,000 voters approx.

بهترین تیک تاکر دختر ۱۴۰۰؟

  1. رکسانا28%
  2. نگین فضلی21%
  3. نیکا فلاحی42%
  4. دیانا رحیمی60%
  5. آتوسا7%
  6. مدیسا7%
  7. مهدیس8%
  8. نوشین1%
  9. باران2%
  10. رعنا2%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2021 to 1 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“「𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡_𝑑𝑖𝑦𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑟ℎ」” (@edit_diyanarh), 30 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edit_diyanarh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.