2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:30
4
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:49
4
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
62.5%
🍓
1
12.5%
👏
1
12.5%
🥰
1
12.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2023 to 6 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@TracybelongstoTad
واقعا قشنگه
میتونی با ی نگاه درونگرایی و علایقش رو حدس بزنی
نقدی ندارم بگم چون همچیزش باهم جور در میاد
از اونجایی ک انگاری ارت کشیدن رو دوست داره کرکترت، یکمی از نمونه کارای "خودش" که انگار خودش کشیده رو بزار
نظر مخاطب رو جلب میکنه و ذهنیت کرکترت هم نشون میده:>
@thewayofbeingapotato
خب، هیماری
دقیقا چیزایی که من خیلی دوست دارمو داره
مثل موهای پف پفی و فرفری
چشمای بزرگ خوشگل که توشون میتونی قلبشون و احساساتشون رو ببینی
در عین حال چشمای خسته، که زیرشون گاهی سیاهه: ")
نیاز دارم بغلش کنم
قلب مهربونی داره ولی زجر کشیده؟
درکل خیلی بامزس
@backroomsartists
کرکترت، و استایلتتتتت خیلی نمکن
طراحی سادش کنار دامن و موهای پفپفیش خیلی جالب نشونش میده
نقدی وارد نی، چون همچیش باهم جور در میاد
عالی🍓
@gracearts
از اسکای میگم چون بیشتر باهاش اشنام
اینکه گفته بودی اسکای یجورایی خودتی برام جالبه
چون باعث میشه مخاطب بتونه ی ذهنیت و تصوری ازت داشته باشه
داستان جذابش کنار مورفی بکنار، همین که اوسیت هم هستش کنار دیزاین سادش ادم بیشتر میخواد راجبش بدونه
حداقل من ک اینطوریم
میشه یبار با کتو شلوار صورتی بکشی-
@Zorosboobs
احتمالا ولف کات و موهای ابیش بیشترین چیزیه که تو چشم مخاطبه
ک هرکی ولف کات با رنگ ابی ببینه یاد اوسی تو میفته
کاتانای خفش به کنار، جزییاتش خیلی قشنگن
اون زخمه رو گردنش؟ خاصش کرده
درکل عالی🐋
@Random_bullshit_go
با اختلاف
پرسونات خیلی باحاله،
چون دیزاین انچنانی نداره، ولی چیزای بامزهای داره که باعث میشه مخاطب تورو یادش بمونه و هرجا پرسونات رو دید یاد تو بیفته و بدونه مال توعه
مثل همون طناب دار پاره شده دور گردن💀..
ویلسون
@theinfinit11
ساده ولی جذاب
چشماش دو رنگه هستش، نشونه ی خاص بودنشه
نظرت چیه یکم تتو رو گردنش بهش بدی؟ شاید جالب شه
ی تتو با مفهوم خاص
میشه با لباس هلو کیتی بکشی-
@senropa_art
مایکل، خب
مایکل خودش خیلی وایب enemies to lovers میده
موهاش، خیلی قشنگن
هرچند اولین چیزی که توش منو جذب کرد چشماش بود
در عین حال ملیح بودن چشماش میتونستی اون حس خاص رو همراهش برسونی
نمیدونم چرا. ولی لطفا یبار با یقه اسکی بکشش خیلی دوس دارم ببینمش اونجوری😭
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ediistired. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ediistired named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dead_green_1 named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@frooghmind named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@gelareh_arts named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@gracearts named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@nyudawhore named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@sharedroom named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@theinfinit11 named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@tracybelongstotad named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@ws_art named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@zorosboobs named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ــ” (@ediistired), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ediistired.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.