Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 240–246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 07:37
242
-1
28 Sept 2026, 17:00
243
-2
6 Sept 2026, 22:01
245
+4
29 Aug 2026, 08:12
241
no change
28 Aug 2026, 14:00
241
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
102
46.6%
🔥
43
19.6%
👍
33
15.1%
🎄
13
5.94%
😍
6
2.74%
❤🔥
5
2.28%
custom 5377734353822432141
3
1.37%
custom 5440748683765227563
3
1.37%
🎅
3
1.37%
💯
3
1.37%
☃
2
0.913%
custom 5404835520150773707
1
0.457%
🤯
1
0.457%
🥰
1
0.457%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔠🔡🔡🔡❕ 👋
Looks like I’m finally making a little comeback after a long period of time… after whatever that phase was 😭
I genuinely hadn’t posted anything for ages because I had absolutely zero mood for it. I felt so close to burnout that even opening Instagram felt exhausting sometimes.
So here are a few useful phrases you can use when talking about returning to something after a break ✨
🔹 Pick up where I le…
🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡❕
📣 Є 2 вільних місця в групу з англійської ОНЛАЙН (в групі максимум 4 людини) 🇬🇧
👩🎓 Підлітки (6–7 клас)
📚 Рівень: A2/A2+
🗓 Вівторок & п’ятниця
⏰ 17:00 (за укр. часом)
Пиши в дірект для деталей ✨
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤‼️
Spring has finally arrived…✨
Happy first day of spring to everyone! I know many of you have been eagerly anticipating it — and the day is finally here 🌸
I love spring for the birdsong, the awakening of flowers and plants, the sense of lightness in the air, and the gentle return of warmth 🍋
🪩What do you love about spring? What makes you look forward to it each year?
❄️ Зима – час мандрівок! ❄️
Пропоную урок на тему Travelling, таку кількість завдань ви не знайдете ніде:
🔅 Багато лексики на сильному рівні А2+, B1 та трошки на B2
🔅 Різноманітна лексика про аеропорт (все що тільки потрібно) поїздки, що брати з собою
🔅 Граматика: Past Simple та Past Continuous
🔅 Аудіо зі скриптами та відпрацювання Reading
🔅 Багато автентичних матеріалів,
письмових завдань та speaking
🔅Quizlet до ко…
Сьогодні я до вас із цікавою групою слів 🎉
Слова які мене питали учні цього тижня 🤔
🔅Скинутися (грошима) 💸🤝
👉 to chip in
Let’s chip in and buy her a gift together.
🔅 Сказати, що це було важко — це нічого не сказати 😮💨
О тут цікаво, бо є декілька варіантів
👉 That barely the surface
Saying it was difficult barely scratches the surface.
👉 It was no walk in the park
Getting through that month was no walk in the park…
Hello everyone! It’s been a while — I know, I kind of went quiet 👀
I didn’t post or share much because it was the holidays, and honestly, I felt the need to step back and replenish my energy ( поповнити мою енергію ).
Sometimes you just have to pause, reset, and refill your inner battery 🔋✨
But now I’m back, feeling refreshed, focused, and ready to share again.
Let’s get back into it 🤍
Happy New Year, guys!🎄
Thank you all for supporting my channel ❤️
I wish you good luck and success in all your endeavors (старання/починання) in2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣, and not just in English 🎁
🎀 My Year In Review 🎀
Кінець 2025 року вже зовсім близько.
Саме той момент, коли хочеться зупинитися, підбити підсумки й чесно запитати себе:
що цього року вдалося?
що так і залишилося планом?
і чого насправді хочеться далі?
🎅 Вартість: 50 грн. (Першим 3 буде + подарунок) 🎄
Сподіваюся, ви вже відпочиваєте й підбиватимете підсумки року вже наступного року.
А я буду дуже вдячна за вашу підтримку — людини, яка з оста…
Обіцянка собі або ціль 🎯
1. This year, my main resolution is to stay consistent with learning English.
2. She made a New Year’s resolution to focus more on her mental health.
3. One of his biggest resolutions was to stop procrastinating and take action.
4. I try to keep/stick (дотримуватися) my resolutions realistic so I don’t give up too quickly.
What are your resolutions? ⭐️
🎄 New Year is coming, guys!
Саме час починати думати про New Year’s resolutions ❤️
Я щороку 31.12 прописую для себе бажання й цілі — і цього року most of them were implemented (реалізувати) 👏
На наступний рік поки що не починала думати, чого саме хочу 🙂
❤8🎅3💯3🎄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @edgeeeeenglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 12 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENGLISH Edge with Oleksandra 🇬🇧” (@edgeeeeenglish), 242 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edgeeeeenglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.