Photo, posted without a caption
👍4

Channel
@edenaofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,242subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002604569107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @edenaofficial |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/edenaofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 5,242 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 5,247 | -17 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 5,264 | -26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 5,290 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 5,292 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 48.9% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 42.6% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 8.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
[Headline] 왜 스테이블코인 생태계의 승부처는 '토큰 기술'이 아닌 '은행 청산 스위치(Clearing Switch)'인가. 글로벌 웹3 인프라 리더들과 함께 LunaTalks X Space 라이브 패널로 참석해 스테이블코인과 RWA의 미래에 대해 심도 있는 논의를 진행했습니다. 결론은 명확했습니다. 단순한 가상자산의 시대는 끝났고, 이제 '제도권 인프라'의 시대가 도래했다는 것입니다. 이번 세션의 3가지 핵심 인사이트를 공유합니다: 1️⃣ 진짜 수요의 발견: B2B 기업 재무 vs 소매 결제의 거품 스테이블코인 결제 비중의 90%는 여전히 트레이딩에 머물러 있습니다. 하지만 실물 경제에서 가장 폭발적으로 성장하는 영역은 바로 B2B 국경 간 결제와 대기업 자금 관리(Treasury)입니다. 기업들은 수일이 걸리는 정산 지연과 …
👍3
[Headline] Why the Stablecoin Game is No Longer About Tech, but Institutional Clearing Switches. Yesterday, EDENA CEO Wook Lee joined the global panel at LunaTalks X Space to discuss the institutional future of stablecoins, RWA, and cross-border settlement. The consensus was clear: the era of crypto-native hype is over. We have officially entered the era of institutional infrastructure. Here are the 3 core takeaway…
Thrilled to announce a monumental milestone in the evolution of global financial infrastructure. Edena has officially executed a landmark Master Framework Agreement (MFA) with global enterprise software giant Silverlake Axis Group to form a strategic Joint Venture (JV). Together, we have launched an independent, Singapore-based clearing infrastructure vehicle: ‘EDENA NEXUS SYSTEMS PTE. LTD.’ This mega-alliance conv…
👍6
https://n.news.naver.com/article/030/0003447563?sid=101
❤4
https://n.news.naver.com/article/015/0005309705?sid=101
❤5
https://n.news.naver.com/article/003/0014065250?sid=101
❤4
'껍데기(Wrapper)' 단계를 넘어: 토큰화가 제도권 금융 레일의 표준이 되는 이유 자산에 단순히 디지털 옷만 입히는 기술적 실험의 시대는 끝났습니다. 이제 토큰화(Tokenization)는 글로벌 제도권 금융 인프라의 독점적 권위와 구조를 디자인하는 핵심 아키텍처로 진화하고 있습니다. 최근 진행된 글로벌 파이낸스 미디어와의 단독 인터뷰를 통해, 2030년까지 최대 20조 달러(한화 약 2경 7천조 원) 규모로 급팽창할 소버린 자산 및 RWA 시장의 본질을 짚었습니다. 현재의 핵심 과제는 단순한 블록체인 연동이 아닌, 국경을 넘나드는 '제도적 상호운용성(Institutional Interoperability)'과 '법적 구속력의 자동 집행'입니다. 에데나(EDENA)는 강력한 기술 동맹을 통해 이를 실현하고 있습니다: 1. 프로토콜…
🥰4
https://impactnews-wire.com/interview-what-interoperability-gaps-are-still-blocking-global-adoption-of-tokenized-sovereign-assets/
Headline: Moving Beyond the “Wrapper Phase”: Why Tokenization Must Shift to Institutional Design. The era of tokenization as a mere digital representation—the "wrapper phase"—is officially over. We are now entering a high-stakes transition toward contested institutional infrastructure design. In my recent comprehensive interview with Faustine Ngila, we discussed a critical shift: The competitive frontier is no long…
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
🚀 BREAKING: EDENA Korea and KB Financial Group Sign Strategic Partnership to Pioneer Next-Gen Digital Asset Infrastructure! We are proud to announce that EDENA Korea has officially entered into a strategic partnership with KB Financial Group (Number 1 financial bank group in South Korea) to scale up Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization and revolutionize institutional digital finance infrastructure. As the digital ass…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @edenaofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 312,856 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EDENA Official Channel” (@edenaofficial), 5,242 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edenaofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.