Channel
@ed_academy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
262subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002417529660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ed_academy |
| Description | На канале есть всё, что позволит уже сейчас улучшить процесс принятия решений: ✔️реальные кейсы ✔️работающие инструменты и методики ✔️совокупный практический опыт 3-х экспертов в корпоративных стратегиях. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ed_academy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 262 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 262 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
81 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 37.0% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 17.3% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 14.8% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 11.1% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 8.64% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 7.41% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как мы тестировали коллегиальность на прочность: и что из этого вышло? В прошлый четверг наша команда провела мероприятие, которое с первого шага планировалось и реализовывалось на основе принципов коллегиальности. И у нас получилось не только поговорить на эту тему, но и протестировать их в действии. 🔥Больше 70 участников — собственники, члены СД и топ-руководители, включились в стресс-тест коллегиального решения,…
❤9🔥6🤝4
Советы директоров всё чаще оказываются под двойным давлением: нужно одновременно показывать результат и соответствовать ESG-повестке, работать с рисками и ожиданиями стейкхолдеров. В таких условиях важна не только стратегия, но и то, как принимаются решения. 📅 11 декабря приглашаем вас в офис Kept на Корпоративную лабораторию «Коллегиальность как мультипликатор управленческих решений» — управленческий эксперимент, к…
🔥5👌3🤝3
Как бизнесу справиться с нарастающим давлением и турбулентностью? Как пережить кадровый голод и санкции? Как не только сохранить бизнес, но и сделать его сильнее, прибыльнее и устойчивее? 💡Наш ответ - Коллегиальность. Именно она становится тем средством, которое позволяет снижать риски и повышать качество управленческих решений. 11 декабря мы попробуем коллегиальность на вкус в КОРПОРАТИВНОЙ ЛАБОРАТОРИИ: КОЛЛЕГИАЛЬ…
🔥5💯3👏2
Спасибо Инне за приглашение! Для нас было важным увидеть, какую практическую пользу участники Кейс-клуба получили, применяя модель JILSS к такому противоречивому кейсу. Они глубоко разобрали ситуацию, аргументированно отстояли свои позиции и показали, как осознанные управленческие решения могут менять траекторию компании. Оффлайн-встречи дают ту концентрацию общения и профессионального обмена, которую сложно замени…
👍1🔥1
Скажу Вам откровенно, наши прекрасные эксперты Кейс-клуба Анастасия Кудрявцева, Анна Бамбурова и Юлия Гаврилец предвосхитили мои ожидания. Под их чутким руководством мы действительно проиграли (и переиграли 😉) настоящий кейс американской технологической корпорации Theranos, который считают крупнейшей аферой современности. Если помните, компанию создала в 2003 году Элизабет Холмс, которая утверждала, что разработа…
👍1
Когда мы говорим о принятии решений в бизнесе, кажется, будто это про «сел - решил». Но стоит копнуть чуть глубже, и становится ясно: любое решение живёт на своём уровне – в операционке топ-команды, в предпринимательской оптике собственника или в стратегическом поле совета директоров. На кейс-клубе мы как раз и посмотрели, что происходит, когда эти уровни не совпадают или тянут в разные стороны.⬅️➡️ 📣Мы разобрали мо…
👏6👌3🔥3❤1
Сегодня мы на площадке Кейс-клуба Инны Можайской.📣 Рассматриваем три уровня принятия решений в команде, авторскую модель принятия решений JILSS, разбираем пять профилей управленческих команд и решаем интерактивный кейс!
🔥10👍7👏6❤2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @ed_academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 651,276 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Академия корпоративных решений” (@ed_academy), 262 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ed_academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.