Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for госпожа цзян 🪷

Channel

госпожа цзян 🪷

@ecstasssy_el

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,077subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001646828545
TypeChannel
Username@ecstasssy_el
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ecstasssy_el

Growth

1,0771,0841,080.56 August 2026 — 1,084 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,084 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,080 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,077 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,076–1,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:141,077-3
10 Aug 2026, 01:171,080-4
6 Aug 2026, 12:211,084no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:011,084first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 1,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,175
Reactions total258
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

736 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15921.6%
❤‍🔥11415.5%
custom 526715975936194371610614.4%
custom 581887811560617192910013.6%
custom 5375168905432025450527.07%
💋435.84%
🔥395.30%
💔364.89%
🤝283.80%
👾182.45%
💅182.45%
🍓141.90%
💘60.815%
🍾30.408%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 736reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ecstasssy_el. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC115 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

тикток решил, что одного зелетевшего видео мне хватит и другие, в принципе, можно уже не показывать... либо ему очень не нравится рико. не осуждаю– я не знаю, как это объяснить, но после него у меня подозрительно сильно и резко усилился фикс на кевине. это что за побочные эффекты? 😩

custom 581887811560617192916❤‍🔥5💋2🔥2custom 52671597593619437162custom 537516890543202545021👾1

4 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC140 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🖇️ ┆ riko moriyama ┆ aftg ┆ ❤️ 🖇️ разблокирован новый персонаж... пополняем мою коллекцию мудил 🖇️@ecstasssy_el 🌟 🖇️@exitus_letalis 🌟

🍓10custom 58188781156061719297custom 52671597593619437165🔥2custom 53751689054320254502❤‍🔥1👾1💅1

1 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC215 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026

...то неловкое чувство, когда регулярно загоняешься из-за качества косплея и картинки, а потом у тебя на ~двадцать пять тысяч залетает размытый видос, где от 'косплея' у тебя только макияж, ты без костюма и парика, но люди в комментариях хвалят и говорят, что это самое лучшее и каноничное, что они видели. как.? почему.? 😶♠️ вахуи ли я? определенно. перестану ли я загоняться? вряд ли... ибо моя требовательность к себ

❤‍🔥1412custom 58188781156061719297custom 52671597593619437163🔥2custom 53751689054320254502👾1💅1

1 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC254 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🖇️┆ jiang cheng & wei wuxian┆ ♥️ главное в отношениях — это стабильность... 🌟@podval_bumbuka 🌟 🌟@ecstasssy_el 🌟

custom 526715975936194371620custom 537516890543202545013custom 581887811560617192913💋4❤‍🔥1🍓1🍾1👾1

31 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC228 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026

спустя месяц врываюсь с закосом по новому фандому, да... только недавно вот наконец ознакомилась с книгами, хотя ну очень давно заглядывалась и думала зашарить. и не зря! меня прям они жестко вайбанули в мою ролевую молодость... где мне тоже необходимо было напихать побольше криминала, стекла и кровавой драмы с огромной кучей персонажей. да, было время... ну, мое, родное, короче! откликнулось, заиграло и снова верн

❤‍🔥11💋8💅64👾2custom 52671597593619437162custom 53751689054320254502custom 58188781156061719292

31 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC223 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🌟🌟 🤖🐓🦞 🐬😂 🐊🐢🐡🐢 🌟🌟🌟 🔺🔺🔺🔺 ♥️ 🌟🌟🌟 Կᥱᴛыρᥱ ρᥲɜᥲ ᧐н ʍ᧐᧘ᥙ᧘ ᧐ 🌟🌟🌟 ᥰρ᧐щᥱнᥙᥙ ᥙ ᥰ᧐щᥲдᥱ, ɜнᥲя, чᴛ᧐ Рᥙκ᧐ нᥱ ᥴᥰ᧐ᥴ᧐δᥱн нᥙ 🌟🌟 ♥️ нᥲ ᴛ᧐, нᥙ нᥲ дρуᴦ᧐ᥱ. 🌟🌟 ♥️ 🔺🔺🔺🔺 🩸

custom 526715975936194371621💔13custom 5818878115606171929115❤‍🔥5💋3👾1💅1

1 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC490 views70 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🖇️ как же невыносимо душно стало в фандомах... я не знаю, может причина в моем выгорании ко всему, а может хейта, нытья и срачей правда стало намного больше... у вас нет такого чувства? уже даже в комментарии лишний раз заходить не хочется.😅 еще эти бесконечные отмены всего и вся. только за последние две недели сразу две громкие новости: сначала про манхву, теперь про фаворита из ладс. да и у нас в фандоме до этого

🤝28💔218custom 52671597593619437165🍾2custom 53751689054320254502custom 58188781156061719292🍓1

1 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC440 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🖇️┆ мария архипова ┆мгфд┆ 🐱 минутка самолюбования женщины в классике >>> 🖇️@ecstasssy_el 🔫 🖇️@exitus_letalis 📖

15custom 581887811560617192912custom 52671597593619437168👾3custom 53751689054320254503❤‍🔥1💅1💋1

26 Jun 2026, 13:30 UTC461 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤+ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🖇️🌒🖇️ 🖇️ в телеге очень страшно напоминать о своем существовании, ибо после неизбежно идет миллион отписок, но я жива!! соскучилась по всем страшно, но пока боюсь что-то обещать... я тут немножко загналась опять, перегорела и разочаровалась в своем контенте. меня душит мой перфекционизм и невозможность что-то моментально прокачать, исправить и улучшить 💔 но планы есть, желание творить тоже, так что

19❤‍🔥8custom 58188781156061719297💋4👾2🍓1💅1custom 52671597593619437161

6 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC929 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖇️💄🖇️🖇️ интерактив для косплееров! репостните этот пост на свой канал, а ваши мью и подписчики составят топ пять любимых образов от вас 🐱🌟 🌟 больше интерактивов ждут вас тут 🌟 рт приветствуется: @ecstasssy_el

❤‍🔥11custom 53751689054320254507💋51👾1💅1💘1

6 Jun 2026, 11:30 UTC507 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🖇️🌟🖇️ 🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎 🍎 но ни угрозы, ни шантаж почему-то так и не сработали... 🖇️@exitus_letalis ❤️ 🖇️@ecstasssy_el 🌟

custom 581887811560617192913❤‍🔥76💋5custom 52671597593619437163custom 53751689054320254502🍓1💘1

31 May 2026, 12:00 UTC593 views60 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖇️▪️🖇️ 🖇️ любимые, извиняюсь за отсутствие контента, вот вам новенький полуголый сюэ ян в качестве извинений 🖤 как же я вайбую в нем, я не можу– вдохновилась фреймом маньхуа, где он в одних бинтах щеголял. я поскромнее, конечно (у меня просто такой бицухи нет 🤍)

30custom 537516890543202545013❤‍🔥7custom 52671597593619437163💋2custom 58188781156061719292👾1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ecstasssy_el. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 160,232 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“госпожа цзян 🪷” (@ecstasssy_el), 1,077 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecstasssy_el.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.