What a privilege it is to be overwhelmed by a life we once prayed for.
👍8

Channel
@econs101
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001493990174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @econs101 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/econs101 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 16:42 | 81 | +4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 77 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 78 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 77 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 78 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 74 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 129 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What a privilege it is to be overwhelmed by a life we once prayed for.
👍8
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5
— Charlie Munger
👍5
Not CGI. SpaceX just soft-landed a rocket in the ocean. Crazy how many ways we can land reusable rockets now.
👍5
When their passive aggressive email has your manager CC'd "for visibility" (via Morning Brew)
👍5
Spectacular ad for Garmin.
👍7
On what principle is it that with nothing but improvement behind us, we are to expect nothing but deterioration before us? — Thomas Babington Macaulay
👍6
Autobiography in Five Short Chapters I. I walk down the street. There is a deep hole in the sidewalk. I fall in. I am lost. I am helpless. It isn't my fault. It takes forever to find a way out. II. I walk down the same street. There is a deep hole in the sidewalk. I still don't see it. I fall in again. I can't believe I am in the same place. It isn't my fault. It still takes a long time to get out. III. I walk dow…
👍7
Antifragile Reading Taleb today. He writes about Seneca, who was one of the richest man in Rome but regularly practiced being poor. He would eat only bread and water for days to rehearse losing everything. If we make the worst-case scenario familiar, it stops scaring us. We just arrange our life to have a small downside and a huge upside. Make more when you're right than you lose when you're wrong — that's antif…
👍5
I am closer to being as rich as Larry Page than Larry Page is to being as rich as Elon :)
👍7
Too once-in-a-lifetime IPO, I guess.
👍6
Google's parent company is planning to invest about 190 billion USD in CAPEX and they say next year's numbers will be significantly higher than this. Just wow.
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @econs101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Managing Oneself” (@econs101), 81 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/econs101.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.