Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for economics and fun

Channel

economics and fun

@economicsandfun23

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001933296314
TypeChannel
Username@economicsandfun23
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/economicsandfun23

Growth

838483.510 August 2026 — 83 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83 subscribers17 August 2026 — 84 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–84 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:3784+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:3183no change
10 Aug 2026, 11:4583first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2927.1%
💯2321.5%
🔥2321.5%
🤝1312.1%
👍109.35%
👀43.74%
👏21.87%
🏆10.935%
😢10.935%
🫡10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2024 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2026, 12:54 UTC114 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @bugunga_nima

🧠 AI va “double standard” — bu adolatsizlikmi? Bugun qiziq paradoks bor: 👉 AI yordamida yozilgan matn — “bu o‘zingniki emas” deyiladi 👉 AI yordamida yaratilgan model yoki texnologiya — “kashfiyot” deyiladi Nega? 📌 Aslida bu ikki xil baholash tizimi: 1. Ilmiy yozuv (writing) Bu yerda savol: kim o‘yladi? Agar fikr AI’dan chiqqan bo‘lsa — bu soxta kompetensiya deb qaraladi. 2. Innovatsiya (model yaratish) Bu yerda

🔥2

Signed Jahongir

7 Apr 2026, 03:55 UTC134 viewsread 10 August 2026

🧠 Qiziq savol: eng yaxshi organ qaysi? Bir so‘rovnoma natijasi: — Miya: 54% — Yurak: 26% — Jigar: 11% — O‘pka: 9% Izoh esa yanada qiziq: “Demak miya o‘zini o‘zi eng yaxshi deb tanlabdi” Lekin aslida… Bu natija organlar haqida emas. Bu — odamlarning qanday fikrlashi haqida. Chunki: Miya tanlamaydi. 👉 Uni ishlatayotgan inson tanlaydi. Va bu yerda eng kuchli insight: Biz nimani “eng muhim” deb hisoblasak — aslida

Signed Jahongir

16 May 2025, 10:35 UTC296 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://youtu.be/lXthzAZtFJs?si=hc0mnbARoH297z2w

🔥2👏1

Signed Jahongir

20 Apr 2025, 08:09 UTC322 viewsread 10 August 2026

Brian Cox: The speed of light. https://youtube.com/shorts/fDBaYfW4uow?si=klTp7gp8LVmUCBVB

Signed Jahongir

15 Apr 2025, 14:32 UTC280 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @pivotuzbekistanPhoto

🍔2025-yil 1-chorakdagi O’zbekistondagi mahalliy venchur fondlari investitsiyalari va venchur fondlardagi kapital holati Analitik: Davron Parmonov ⸻ 🍔Local VC Investments to startups and Venture Funds capital in 2025 Q1 Analyst: Davron Parmonov Instagram | LinkedIn | X (Twitter) | Facebook | YouTubex

Signed Jahongir

30 Oct 2024, 03:02 UTC389 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @iqtisodchi_kundaligiPhoto

O'zbekiston va Qozog'istondagi daromadlar va fertillik raqamlari.

1

Signed Jahongir

30 Oct 2024, 03:02 UTC318 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @iqtisodchi_kundaligi

Oddiy qilib aytadigan boʻlsa, bordi-yu Oʻzbekistonda qandaydir iqtisodiy moʻjiza sodir boʻldi va bizda daromadlar 6 barobarga oshdi — deylik Qozogʻistonga yetib olishni boshladik — bu jarayon natijasida tabiiyki tugʻilish koʻrsatkichlari kamayadi, lekin savol shundaki, hozirning oʻzida Qozogʻiston bilan teng boʻlib turgan boʻlsa, moʻjiza evaziga boyib ketsak tugʻilish darajasi qanday boʻlib qoladi? Albatta bu ritorik

Signed Jahongir

30 Oct 2024, 02:59 UTC205 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @iqtisodchi_kundaligi

Tugʻilish Koʻrsatkichlari haqida, kechagi mulohazadan ilhomlanib. 1991-yilda Oʻzbekiston aholisi 20,6 million boʻlib, 723,4 ming bola tugʻilgan. 2023-yilda aholi soni 36,4 millionga yetdi va tugʻilishlar soni 968,1 mingni tashkil etdi — bu mamlakat tarixidagi rekord son edi. Endi kishi boshiga sanaylik. Agar 1991-yildagi tugʻilish koeffitsiyenti saqlanib qolganida, 2023-yilda tugʻilishlar soni 1,277 million boʻlar

👀1

Signed Jahongir

23 Aug 2024, 16:16 UTC459 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

1 soatda PUL haqida hech narsani bilmasligingizni tushunasiz https://youtube.com/watch?v=9b-iZ8TSEA4&si=_LDQ0PaM3jVntQZH

👀1

Signed Jahongir

10 Aug 2024, 08:16 UTC479 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Assalomu alaykum qadrli talabalar sizlardan yordam kerak edi agar kimdadir maktab derektor tanishi yoki oʻquv markaz boshligʻi tanishi bolsa mani lichkamga yozing

😢1

Signed Jahongir

24 May 2024, 04:29 UTC755 viewsread 10 August 2026

Did The Future Already Happen? - The Paradox of Time https://youtube.com/watch?v=wwSzpaTHyS8&si=ibtlAKJ7b2L2N3xe

Signed Jahongir

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @economicsandfun23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ChatGPT 4.0 & [🅼🅹] | Bot News
@ChatGPT_BotNews · 316,619
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“economics and fun” (@economicsandfun23), 84 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economicsandfun23.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.