Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UGC NET/JRF & SET ECONOMICS ( Gopali) 📚

Channel

UGC NET/JRF & SET ECONOMICS ( Gopali) 📚

@economics_ugc_net

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,778subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001230176590
TypeChannel
Username@economics_ugc_net
Description1. Previous year Question (PYQ)paper 2. Topic wise Detail notes & Analysis 3. Strategy for UGC NET JRF Exam 4. Quiz of paper I and paper II 5. Entrance exam
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/economics_ugc_net

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7637,8567,809.510 August 2026 — 7,838 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,844 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,837 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,852 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,856 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,848 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,853 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,850 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,852 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,847 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,844 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,848 subscribers24 September 2026 — 7,839 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,804 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,794 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,782 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,777 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,764 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,763 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,767 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,772 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,780 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,785 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,778 subscribers7,77810 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,749–7,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 09:017,778-7
5 Nov 2026, 00:107,785+5
2 Nov 2026, 04:387,780+8
29 Oct 2026, 20:007,772+5
26 Oct 2026, 14:567,767+4
23 Oct 2026, 18:367,763-1
20 Oct 2026, 23:207,764-13
17 Oct 2026, 11:597,777-5
14 Oct 2026, 11:077,782-12
10 Oct 2026, 12:197,794-10
4 Oct 2026, 15:567,804-35
24 Sept 2026, 20:367,839-9
16 Sept 2026, 16:567,848+4
13 Sept 2026, 01:397,844-3
8 Sept 2026, 17:177,847-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:037,852+2
30 Aug 2026, 22:237,850-3
28 Aug 2026, 00:227,853+5
24 Aug 2026, 20:467,848-8
21 Aug 2026, 02:277,856first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.75%
avg views ÷ 7,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
447
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.464%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held32 (27 January 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total1,342
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
95
Videos
12
Links
202

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 27s
Average length
4m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7084.3%
👍1214.5%
😁11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 15:25 UTC434 viewsread 11 November 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/SnXU67MMnaA?si=Zku2Ab3Ew9RiqJA8

9 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,710 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeRFf8nvdP5/?cplk=cWgybjE4YXF3MnFq

15 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈3,230 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

The entire subject is taught in response to one question. What an amazing way! I would like to have had such a course when I was in M.A. But no one was there to teach it in such a way.

❤9

11 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈3,080 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026

The public has its own odyssey. Directing them is not a democratic practice.

❤2

3 Sept 2026, 04:53 UTC≈3,290 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍10❤4

13 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈3,460 viewsread 11 November 2026

For whom is this podcast relevant? It’s for those who want to become millionaires in the next 15 years and anyone looking to fix the paper leak problem without increasing seats, excluding deep state actors and rent seekers.

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @economics_ugc_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Feb 2026, 10:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz364 voters

गतिशील असंगति वह स्थिति है जिसमें

  1. समय के साथ व्यावसायिक नीति में परिवर्तन होता है17%
  2. समय के साथ सरकार में परिवर्तन होता है12%
  3. निर्णयकर्ता की प्राथमिकताएँ समय के साथ बदल जाती हैं49%
  4. निर्णयकर्ता पहले से इष्टतम योजनाओं को लागू करने में विफल रहता है22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Feb 2026, 10:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz550 voters

Dynamic inconsistency is a situation in which

  1. Changes in the business policy over time15%
  2. Change in Government over the time16%
  3. Decision maker’s preference change over time47%
  4. Decision maker fails to implement previously optimal plans22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jan 2026, 12:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz314 voters

न्यू-कीन्सियन स्कूल के अनुसार कीमतें और मजदूरी “स्टिकी” होती हैं, जिसका अर्थ है—

  1. वे तकनीकी झटकों के अनुसार तेज़ी से समायोजित होती हैं8%
  2. वे अल्पकालिक आर्थिक उतार-चढ़ाव के अनुसार धीरे-धीरे समायोजित होती हैं64%
  3. वे अल्पकालिक आर्थिक उतार-चढ़ाव के अनुसार तेज़ी से समायोजित होती हैं21%
  4. वे अल्पकाल में बिल्कुल भी समायोजित नहीं होती हैं6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jan 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz518 voters

New Keynesian School advocates that prices and wages are “sticky” meaning

  1. They adjust fastly to technological shocks5%
  2. They adjust slowly to short-term economic fluctuations57%
  3. They adjust fastly to short-term economic fluctuations17%
  4. They do not adjust at all in the short run21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jan 2026, 12:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz451 voters

राष्ट्रीय आय / GDP के आकलन की आधुनिक विधि किसने दी?

  1. अल्फ्रेड मार्शल19%
  2. जॉन मेनार्ड कीन्स29%
  3. साइमन कुज़नेट्स43%
  4. पॉल सैमुएलसन10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jan 2026, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz621 voters

Who developed the modern method of estimating National Income / GDP?

  1. Alfred Marshall14%
  2. John Maynard Keynes36%
  3. Simon Kuznets40%
  4. Paul Samuelson10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Funny Videos
@Videos_funny_memes_gifs_english · 43,379
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 27 August 2026
Dr Lokesh Bali
@DrLokeshBali · 45,129
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Online Gk Current Affairs Quiz™ SSC UPSC BPSC MPSC Banking Exams🎯
@Online_upsc_bpsc_mpsc_gk_quiz · 286,390
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UGC NET/JRF & SET ECONOMICS ( Gopali) 📚” (@economics_ugc_net), 7,778 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economics_ugc_net.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.