Channel
@economic_disputes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,449subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001792520193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @economic_disputes |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/economic_disputes |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 4,449 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 4,452 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 4,458 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 4,465 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 4,467 | +23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 4,444 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 4,443 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 4,449 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 4,439 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 4,444 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 4,449 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 4,450 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 4,451 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 52 | 35.4% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5458908492687497206 | 28 | 19.0% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 6.80% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.68% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С наступающим Днем строителя! 🏗️ Поздравляем всех, кто проектирует, строит, контролирует и развивает строительную отрасль. Для нас строительные споры — одно из ключевых направлений практики. ⚖️ Мы много работаем с подрядчиками, застройщиками, проектными организациями, техническими заказчиками и поставщиками, поэтому хорошо понимаем специфику отрасли, риски и реальные бизнес-задачи. 🧱 Сопровождаем строительные прое…
❤8
Video message, posted without a caption
👍4
Проводим обучение по персональным данным 📌 Разбираем требования, риски и типичные ошибки. По итогам обучения выдаем сертификат государственного образца ✅ Нужно обучение для вашей команды? Обращайтесь.
❤4
Posted without readable text
👍4
Португалия — новое направление для регистрации бизнеса 🇵🇹 Можно ли открыть компанию удаленно? Как открыть счет? Реально ли получить ВНЖ через бизнес? В видео коротко разбираем главные вопросы и нюансы, о которых важно знать до регистрации компании в Португалии.
👌5❤4👍1custom 54589084926874972061
Арбитражный суд города Москвы взыскал 1 миллион рублей за незаконное использование названия музыкального произведения Игоря Николаева «Дельфин и русалка». История получилась показательная — особенно для бизнеса, который выбирает название для ресторана, бренда, сайта или проекта. В Сочи работал ресторан с названием «Дельфин и русалка». Причем это обозначение использовалось не точечно, а фактически везде: ▪️ на выв…
👍8🤨4❤1
Юридическая мемология начинается там, где заканчивается фраза: «Да там ничего сложного»😅 Собираем профессиональную боль в комментариях. Напишите фразу из вашей сферы, после которой вы уже знаете: сейчас будет интересно 👇
custom 545890849268749720624👍9❤2🤝1
🔥 Wildberries начал выплачивать компенсации за товары, сгоревшие на складе в Электростали Wildberries приступил к первым выплатам селлерам, чьи товары пострадали после атаки дронов на логистический центр в Электростали. Об этом сообщила основательница маркетплейса Татьяна Ким. 🇧🇾 По данным СМИ, выплаты касаются в том числе белорусских продавцов. 💬 В первую очередь маркетплейс планирует поддержать небольших предпри…
❤6👌3
Пожары на складах Wildberries. Что делать белорусским селлерам? В ночь на 18 июля были атакованы два крупных логистических центра Wildberries — в Электростали и Котовске. По предварительным оценкам, ущерб может быть огромным, а многие продавцы рискуют столкнуться с утратой товара. Wildberries уже заявил о первых мерах поддержки: скидках на хранение, бесплатном транзите на региональные склады и проработке компенсаци…
👍7custom 54589084926874972063
Летний топ юридических ТГ-каналов: В одной папке собрали 25 качественных каналов о праве, проверенных временем и заслуживающих вашего внимания. В папке топ-каналы: • юридические новости • практические кейсы • обзоры и экспертные мнения Сохраняйте папку целиком или выбирайте нужное из перечня. ➡️Ссылка на папку🗂
👍5❤🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5
С 21 июня 2026 года в Закон об урегулировании неплатежеспособности вводится новая статья 9-1, которая существенно меняет подход к ответственности за долги по заработной плате. Теперь, если компания признана банкротом, у неё отсутствует имущество, но при этом перед работниками осталась задолженность по зарплате, ответственность за её выплату может быть возложена на собственников, учредителей и участников обанкротивше…
👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @economic_disputes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Экономические споры⚖️ | e-sud.by” (@economic_disputes), 4,449 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economic_disputes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.