Channel
@eco_pero_esg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
252subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001702875476 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eco_pero_esg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eco_pero_esg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 252 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 251 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 251 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (17 April 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 98 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
78 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 65.4% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 26.9% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы с мужем ждем малыша🤰🏼 У меня закончился первый триместр беременности. Первый месяц я о ней не знала и тягала в удовольствие железки в зале, вела проекты, собирала чемоданы в Азию. А с июня как началось 😅 Это странное состояние. Привычный образ жизни перевернулся с ног на голову: никуда не хочется выходить, никого не хочется видеть. Работать стало невыносимо, про спорт вообще молчу. Нормально поесть это отдельный…
❤29🔥7🥰1
Употребляете контент на других языках?
The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Зачастую, я отправляю новости из англоязычных источников. И у меня возникает вопрос, насколько у вас настроены инструменты для работы с англоязычным контентом и инструменты перевода?
Подборка исследований и новостей устойчивого развития & AI прошлого месяца👀 Исследование от Института воды, окружающей среды и здоровья Университета ООН Авторы предупреждают об экоущербе от роста энергопотребления AI и подчеркивают, что преимущества от внедрения технологий могут его не покрыть. Если выход и есть, то в создании ответственной экосистемы на основе принципов прозрачности, справедливости и ответственнос…
❤2
Бесплатный курс от Anthropic для НКО Создатели Claude в 2025 году сделали открытый курс «AI-грамотность для НКО». Он разработан совместно с GivingTuesday — это глобальное движение «Щедрый Вторник». Компания «Технологии и решения» перевела 5,5 часов видео и упражнений на русский язык. Курс состоит из 4 модулей и 9 уроков. ✅Фреймворк 4D (Делегирование, Описание, Различение, Добросовестность) Интересный ракурс, как …
❤6🔥3🥰1
На работе готовим важное мероприятие🍃 Москвичи, приходите, мероприятие платное, но для вас бесплатно по промо-коду👌🏻 23 июня на Неделе российского ритейла пройдет экспертная сессия «Потребитель и экологичный выбор: что работает для роста зеленой полки». Организаторы: Экологический союз, ТС «Лента» и SPLAT Global. Ключевые вопросы: ❗️Что мешает рынку активнее говорить об экологичности товаров и экопотреблении так, ч…
❤4
Майский дайджест об AI и устойчивом развитии напомнил, что «мир дикого Запада» в AI будет не вечным. Рынок взрослеет и правил становится больше. Папа Римский Лев XIV призывает регулировать AI Понтифик в новом документе папского учения призвал замедлить развитие AI и ввести правовые рамки, независимый надзор и ответственность политиков. Он сравнил развитие AI с Вавилонской башней, указав, что человечество стоит перед…
❤3👍1
Сейчас есть три уровня глубины взаимодействия с AI Уровень 1. Самые популярные и привычные нам чат-боты — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, ЯндексGPT и другие. Мы работаем с ними в стиле «отправил вопрос — получил ответ» и, зачастую, без платных подписок или без персональных настроек. Уровень 2. Настройка AI-ассистентов. Всё те же AI-сервисы, что я упомянула выше. Но на платных тарифах у нас есть возможность настраивать про…
🔥3👍1
Сколько людей на самом деле используют AI? Третий месяц веду практикумы по AI на курсе для тех, кто пишет отчёт об устойчивом развитии в этом году. Очень многое уже обсудили, в том числе технику безопасности, этику, политику, как раскрывать использование ИИ и всё необходимое для работы с AI-ассистентами. Мне сейчас это очень помогает структурировать то, что сама знаю, закрыть пробелы и понять, что сейчас нужно людя…
❤6
Право на отказ от AI Центр этики Университета Флориды (UCF) провёл публичную дискуссию: имеют ли люди право отказываться от AI в своих профессиях и жизни. Один из главных тезисов: «право на отказ» это не регресс и не луддизм, а полноценный этический выбор, который должен быть защищён на институциональном уровне, особенно в медицине, образовании и правосудии. Бизнес в России раскритиковал закон об AI Бизнес критикуе…
👍2🔥2❤1
Попросила AI-ассистента по гринвошингу проанализировать гель для стирки Реальность такова, что результаты анализа на гринвошинг почти полностью зависят от границ этого анализа. Поэтому приложила форму, в которой границы обозначены. Из материалов отправила только фото. Остальное он проверяет по открытым источникам. И сказала, что хочу подробный анализ. Как обычно, он не щадит 😁 Когда дополнительно спросила про сер…
🔥6
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @eco_pero_esg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Употребляете контент на других языках?
The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 34,429 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EcoPero: нейросети l благотворительность l ESG” (@eco_pero_esg), 252 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eco_pero_esg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.