Channel
@echosinfo
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003746483219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @echosinfo |
| Description | direct @definitelynotecho ! he/they ONLY special thanks for this info to @ashswagglvr |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/echosinfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 1 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 1 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 14 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
. π€©π°π πΉππ e π 𦴠π. βοΈ. π¦·π¦·iα΅΄t. ππ ππ @ rα₯±πα₯±nαeπ@ Ι±r. Ο»α₯²tthα₯±w . π @ mr. Ξ΅ndπrα«Ξ±rk πΆπ π . @ α΄etπkα΅΄ π@ α΅΄evα₯²stiα₯²n . π . @ α₯²lice .β€οΈ π .
πππββ
πππππππππππ πππ π π:π± Ιͺ α₯.α₯ | π€©γ | π€©. π¦·π¦·i.st α΅α΅ | ΫΆΫΰ§.ππ κ¨ ππ€© πππππππππππ
βββπβββ
πΉ Οh o Ξ±re yπβͺ?? π
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
πππππ
. π»π.πΈ. ππrα₯± . πππ π ΖΞ±ndoαs ; π° π α«α₯i . ; . plz interΞ±ct π π anon ; dm ; tgc π πππππππππππ
πππββ
π βοΈπ. π‘eWO!! ππ. πγ°οΈ .ππ| Iβm πΉch0 |π ππ|. im 18 y.o. bd: 30.05. |ππ _ππ€©afab; nb ; pan : - π ακ« < tακ«α§πΉ_π ππππππππππππ
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @echosinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
πΉ Οh o Ξ±re yπβͺ?? π
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βInfo πβ (@echosinfo), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/echosinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.