Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ехо 80100

Channel

Ехо 80100

@echo80100

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

35,294subscribers

+1,929 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001109280950
TypeChannel
Username@echo80100
DescriptionНовини Шептицького (Червонограда)
Created8 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/echo80100

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

33,36535,66134,5137 August 2026 — 33,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,367 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,370 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,390 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,407 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,430 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,415 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,401 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,438 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,489 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,591 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,648 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,690 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,839 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,898 subscribers22 August 2026 — 34,038 subscribers24 August 2026 — 34,164 subscribers25 August 2026 — 34,343 subscribers26 August 2026 — 34,519 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,677 subscribers28 August 2026 — 34,762 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,898 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,013 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,144 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,327 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,376 subscribers3 September 2026 — 35,445 subscribers5 September 2026 — 35,661 subscribers9 September 2026 — 35,638 subscribers11 September 2026 — 35,618 subscribers13 September 2026 — 35,599 subscribers15 September 2026 — 35,584 subscribers17 September 2026 — 35,541 subscribers19 September 2026 — 35,457 subscribers26 September 2026 — 35,294 subscribers35,2947 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,929. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,021–36,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 17:3935,294-163
19 Sept 2026, 16:2035,457-84
17 Sept 2026, 03:2135,541-43
15 Sept 2026, 04:2035,584-15
13 Sept 2026, 16:2135,599-19
11 Sept 2026, 19:0135,618-20
9 Sept 2026, 05:3535,638-23
5 Sept 2026, 20:3735,661+216
3 Sept 2026, 16:0035,445+69
2 Sept 2026, 06:1135,376+49
1 Sept 2026, 05:3835,327+183
31 Aug 2026, 04:3535,144+131
30 Aug 2026, 06:3435,013+115
29 Aug 2026, 09:3834,898+136
28 Aug 2026, 11:3334,762+85
27 Aug 2026, 11:5834,677+158
26 Aug 2026, 09:5634,519+176
25 Aug 2026, 11:1634,343+179
24 Aug 2026, 10:4634,164+126
22 Aug 2026, 21:5434,038first reading

Engagement

287 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 35,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,280
126 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.772%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
126
of 287 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held287 (5 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total916,900
Reactions total7,077
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 06:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈13,400
Videos
≈1,140
Links
≈4,950

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35m 57s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 49 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17,603 reactions across 287 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,35247.4%
😢2,90016.5%
👍1,0796.13%
🤬8734.96%
🕊8164.64%
😱7674.36%
😁5353.04%
👎4802.73%
❤‍🔥4332.46%
🔥4012.28%
🥱3471.97%
🤯2101.19%
👏1700.966%
⚡810.46%
🤩620.352%
🤔560.318%
🥰370.21%
🎉40.023%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 287 of the 287 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,603 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈5,850 views27 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Завтра, 30 вересня, ОРІЄНТОВНО з 09:00 до 15:00 буде понижений тиск води тут ▪️вул. Івасюка, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 23, 27 ▪️вул. Шкільна, 2, 4, 6 ▪️вул. Бандери, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 ▪️вул. Стуса, 39, 41, 47 ▪️вул. Тарнавського, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 4а, 4б ▪️просп. Шевченка, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 ▪️вул. Грінченка — всі будинки Причина — заміна водогону на Центральній міській лікарні.

❤21😱4😁2

29 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈6,050 views39 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Ми в курсі, що зараз в коментарях буде душно, але і ці коментатори можуть видихнути — мотосезон-2026 закриють 4 жовтня. Всі інші знають, яке це видовищне дійство. Як нам повідомили, мотоциклісти проїдуться Шептицьким, заїдуть традиційно в центр міста (це завжди була улюблена частина дітей). А далі попрямують в Мости і Радехів.

❤35🥱3👎1

29 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTC≈5,880 views31 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Шептицький міський суд очолив Микола Новосад Про це повідомили на сторінці суду. Миколу Денисовича обрали під час зборів 24 вересня шляхом таємного голосування.

❤25🤯5😁1

29 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC≈6,200 views19 reactionsread 30 September 2026

В Центрі надання адміністративних послуг з понеділка спостерігаються проблеми з роботою із окремими реєстрами. Проте, каже керівник ЦНАПу Юрій Галах, фахівці вже працюють над відновленням роботи. Юрій пояснює — проблеми виникли не в Шептицькому, а в дата-центрах столиці. Така ситуація — не тільки в ЦНАПі. Проте зараз спеціалісти роблять усе можливе, аби відновити надання адміністративних послуг якомога швидше. Прох…

👍11❤7👎1

29 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC≈6,040 views49 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Собор святого Володимира в Шептицькому запрошує 4 жовтня на концерт та частування з нагоди свята Покрови та Дня Захисників і Захисниць України Початок о 13:00

❤47👎1🤯1

29 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC≈6,670 views58 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Третього жовтня у Шептицькому відбудеться автопробіг пам’яті нашого Героя Олександра Гундзика. Якщо ви знали Олександра, приєднайтесь до вшанування. Старт автопробігу — о 10:00 з Вічевої площі, колона проїде вулицями міста до Бендюзького кладовища. Ехо вестиме прямий ефір автопробігу. Тож якщо ви побачите, що колона наближається до вас, вийдіть, зупиніться, вшануйте памʼять хлопця, який пішов зовсім молодим, захища…

😢38❤17⚡1👎1🤩1

29 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC≈6,530 views13 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Посилання на голосувалку ради, якщо що: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd4czX721JiahVijNVAQ00_JI8g_ftRkVw7yKTec0dX3ssw5g/viewform

❤13

29 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTC≈7,460 views73 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Poll

Чи треба ставити ялинку в центрі Шептицького?

  1. Так77%
  2. Ні13%
  3. Все одно13%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤45👍20🔥5🤩3

29 Sept 2026, 06:32 UTC≈7,480 views104 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Міська рада питає, чи ставити цього року ялинку. В наступному пості ми зробимо своє опитування, а поки нагадуємо, якою була ялинка-2026

👎62👍41❤1

29 Sept 2026, 04:58 UTC≈7,900 views102 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

На Шептицького, 31 у Шептицькому сталось займання. На жаль, чоловік, який перебував в квартирі, загинув через сильну задимленість приміщення. Співчуваємо рідним.

😱73❤13😢13😁3

28 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC≈8,250 views46 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Це був важкий матч Для вболівальників

❤28🥱7🤬6❤‍🔥2🔥1🤯1😁1

28 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC≈8,490 views39 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Прогнози?

❤‍🔥26🤩9🤬4

Showing the 12 most recent of 287 posts we hold for @echo80100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@echo80100 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTCAnonymous Poll2,130 voters approx.

Чи треба ставити ялинку в центрі Шептицького?

  1. Так77%
  2. Ні13%
  3. Все одно13%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTCAnonymous Poll1,240 voters approx.

Яким таксі ви найчастіше користуєтесь у Шептицькому?

  1. Євро таксі3%
  2. OnTaxi79%
  3. Таксі Шанс13%
  4. Вояж2%
  5. Таксі 20004%
  6. Шансон1%
  7. Десятка1%
  8. Інше таксі7%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Львівобленерго💡Новини
@lvivoblenergo · 177,137
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Львів 24/7 🟢
@lviv_24x7 · 61,612
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Львів ⚡️Новини
@lviv_insider · 56,952
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Львів Сьогодні
@lviv_svitlo · 76,618
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ехо 80100” (@echo80100), 35,294 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/echo80100.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.