Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 17 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.0%
- avg views ÷ 11,448 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,290
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.131%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 262
- Videos
- 32
- Links
- 82
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
18 Sept 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,760 views5 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
🥳😜😜😝广州荔湾大型海选97嘉悦水汇【大型海选】
📣#质量场 #海选 #95场 #97场 #磨棒
😦#荔湾 #金沙洲 #佛山 #广州
🤣🤣🤣🤣 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
特色优点:全广州唯一大型海选水汇,也是全广州性价比最高的一家海选97水汇,B牌只需要629就可以见识到长龙阵海选派对,新店新开业,所有技师新鲜出炉,本店目前在水汇热门榜排第一,特色97海选水汇,技师都是一排一排的让你选,看上哪个就挑哪个,环境超高档,全新装新,店里新增上百套情趣制服,各种黑丝肉丝网袜等等,喜欢什么样的可以吩咐好技师穿。嘉悦水汇位在荔湾最热闹繁华的地方,靠近佛山,很多佛山老板专门过来打卡体验,真正的海选,目前每天70多位技师在店,技师资源充足,所有技师每个月体检一次,健康当面包放心。
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
9️⃣7️⃣服务内容:
特色艳舞开场 挑选情趣内衣 丝袜调情 腿交足交 唇吸 冰火…
❤5
18 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
🏷 上榜老师·广告推介
⭐ 老师:#蛇宝
🏠 地点:广州天河
⭐ 账号:@sheshegg
🚀 频道:https://t.me/sheduvvk
🚀 福利:https://t.me/ggrbgt
💰 价格:700P 1300PP
🏷️ 标签:#舌吻 #口爆 #野战 #车震 #露出
❤️ 06年贵州妹妹,皮肤正常肤色,手感光滑,温柔贴心,情绪价值拉到夯
❤1
18 Sept 2026, 02:33 UTC≈2,550 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
给大家推荐一名成都黄V:
成都 & 王大锤
专注出击嫩妹老师,真实实拍!
📱主频道: https://t.me/dachuicj11
📱大锤TV: https://t.me/dachuifuli1
❤1
17 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC≈3,020 views5 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Photo
🔈🫠🫠🫠广州首家嫩妹97水汇
🥰白云金沙洲星悦国际【嫩妹大场】
👠#全员嫩妹高端质量场 #97场
📍#白云 #金沙洲 #同德围 #西村
🫠🫠🫠🫠 🫠🫠🫠🫠
特色优点:本店技师以年轻群体为主,大多数都是年轻00后,没有高于30岁以上技师 主打高颜值高质量嫩模嫩妹,超S牌更是顶美03后嫩妹 每一位都是高薪招聘严格筛选 模特车模级!眼见为实支持到店验牌 不对版不满意转身走免收门票费!新装修大型豪华高端水汇 服务更是一流 独家招牌倒立口爆 任意姿势大尺寸磨棒等等,欢迎各位老哥前来验证 本店每一位技师半月一体检(可验报告)用品均是一客一换 拥有质量同时保证每一位顾客健康安全,全力打造质量与服务广州大型97高端水汇天花板。
😇店内24小时免费提供
停车 过夜 大型恒温泡池 自助餐 点餐 水果饮料 干蒸汗蒸 桌球室 乒乓球 棋牌室 单人VIP包房过夜 还有商务接待VIP多人包房留宿 #会所 #水汇
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️…
❤2👍1👏1🥰1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ecdiary003. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州&佛山·EC昆记” (@ecdiary003), 11,448 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecdiary003.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.