Все люди как книги, и мы их читаем, Кого-то за месяц, кого-то за два. Кого-то спустя лишь года понимаем, Кого-то прочесть не дано никогда. … Кого-то прочтём и поставим на полку, Пыль памяти изредка будем сдувать... И в сердце храним... но что с этого толку? Ведь не интересно второй раз читать! Есть люди-поэмы и люди-романы, Стихи есть и проза - лишь вам выбирать. А может быть, вам это всё ещё рано И лучше журнальчи…
Views per post sit far above this size band
21,000 average views per post against 18,851 subscribers — an engagement rate of 111.5%. Across the 12,300 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,016–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.59% and 18.7%, with a median of 9.35%.
| Window | 30 days (29 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 30 of 30 published in the window (0 exact, 30 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 630,600 |
| Mature posts only | 111.5% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 18,851 measured 26 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:rus · 12,300 channels · p10 2.29% · p25 4.59% · p50 9.35% · p75 18.7% · p90 34.3% |
| Position in cohort | 99.846th percentile · 11.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.155% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
