Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

БеLove

@Belovanv1963

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,506subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179229222
TypeChannel
Username@Belovanv1963
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Belovanv1963

Growth

2,5062,5292,517.57 August 2026 — 2,529 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,514 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,506 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,503–2,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:092,506-8
10 Aug 2026, 22:522,514-12
8 Aug 2026, 05:262,526-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:482,529first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.45%
avg views ÷ 2,506 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held7 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total254
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC33 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Мощное извержение вулкана Фуэго в Гватемале

5 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Грядут выборы депутатов Государственной Думы ФС РФ IX созыва. Всегда это событие накладывает на избирателей ответственность за правильность этого выбора. Как сделать правильный шаг, как понять, достоин ли кандидат в депутаты высшего законодательного органа страны представлять интересы народа? Эти и многие другие вопросы волнуют сегодня всех избирателей. Думаю о своем выборе и я, учитель московской школы. Для меня оче

5 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soberussiaPhoto

Султан Хамзаев в тройке лидеров по эффективности депутатов VIII созыва Завершился пятилетний политический сезон VIII созыва Государственной Думы Российской Федерации, и аналитики представили свой рейтинг эффективности работы народных избранников. Этот рейтинг, сформированный на основе данных ИИ и экспертного мнения, ежемесячно определял наиболее продуктивных депутатов. Султан Хамзаев уверенно вошел в тройку лидеров.

5 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC27 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sultanhamzaevPhoto

Дорогие друзья! За годы совместной работы Всероссийского движения «Трезвая Россия» и лучшей правовой программы России «Вести. Дежурная Часть» при поддержке правоохранителей, силовиков мы пресекли тысячи преступлений и правонарушений, все виновные привлечены к законной ответственности, провели десятки важных расследований. Поблагодарил за совместную работу моего друга, известного журналиста, заместителя директора —

4 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @marvelous2309Video

Даже не знаю, что тут дописать. Просто Ирину Александровну очень приятно слушать. Доброго вторника дорогому читателю!

2 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC64 viewsread 7 August 2026

Мой отец, когда ему было семнадцать лет, на ярмарке увидел девочку. Четырнадцатилетнюю девочку в синем платье с синим бантом. И влюбился. Ждал, когда ей исполнится восемнадцать, попросил ее в жены. Он ее обожал... Они жили и радовались каждому пережитому дню, до самого конца. И это было искренне, так трогательно и прекрасно! Я видела, как хорошие люди в хороших семьях ругаются, кому пойти поставить чайник. У нас руг

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Belovanv1963. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 200,875 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ХАМЗАЕВ
@sultanhamzaev · 271,042
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БеLove” (@Belovanv1963), 2,506 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Belovanv1963.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.