Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یونس عبادالهیان | مدیر آموزشی

Channel

یونس عبادالهیان | مدیر آموزشی

@ebadollahian_Fplus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,682subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002124195386
TypeChannel
Username@ebadollahian_Fplus
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ebadollahian_Fplus

Growth

2,6292,6882,658.57 August 2026 — 2,674 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,674 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,673 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,668 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,667 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,651 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,629 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,688 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,682 subscribers2,6827 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,620–2,697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 02:542,682-6
26 Aug 2026, 11:522,688+59
23 Aug 2026, 16:482,629-2
20 Aug 2026, 08:282,631-20
17 Aug 2026, 10:492,651-16
13 Aug 2026, 13:182,667-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:472,668-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:452,673-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:482,674no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:382,674first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.1%
avg views ÷ 2,682 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,960
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.283%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total21,552
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔14952.3%
9433.0%
🔥258.77%
🤔165.61%
🍓10.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC362 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

داستان همینجا تموم ‌نمیشه دو تا منبع اختصاصی فرهنگیان و چیکار کنیم ؟! یونس عبادالهیان | مدیرآموزشی FP 🆔 @ebadollahian_Fplus

🤔151🍓1

5 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC596 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔹 راهبرد دسته‌های مختلف دانش آموزان از الان تا کنکور : ❤️ دسته ۱ : اجرای کامل برنامه راهبردی : این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که تمامی مراحل برنامه راهبردی را به‌طور کامل انجام داده‌اند. ❤️ دسته ۲ : مطالعه و مرور کامل، بدون تکمیل مرحله نهایی : این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که بخش عمده برنامه راهبردی را انجام داده‌اند، اما به دلیل محدودیت زمان، موفق به تکمیل مراحل پایانی نشده‌اند. ❤️ دسته ۳ : مطالعه ، بدون مرور و

3

4 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC≈3,930 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

دسته ۵: شروع مطالعه از امتحانات نهایی این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که تا پیش از امتحانات نهایی، مطالعه مؤثری برای کنکور نداشته‌اند یا مطالعه آن‌ها بسیار محدود بوده است. 🔶روند آن‌ها به این شکل بوده است: 🔹عدم اجرای برنامه راهبردی 🔹نداشتن مطالعه منظم برای مباحث کنکور 🔹تمرکز صرف بر مطالعه دروس پایه دوازدهم برای امتحانات نهایی برای ادامه مسیر فقط مطالعه دوازدهم انجام بدیم ؟! میتونیم از پایه هم مطالعه داشته باشیم ؟! م

6

4 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC≈3,680 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

دسته ۴: مطالعه پراکنده و بدون برنامه این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که پیش از امتحانات نهایی، مطالعه‌هایی پراکنده و نامنظم داشته‌اند و از برنامه راهبردی مشخصی پیروی نکرده‌اند. 🔶روند آن‌ها معمولاً به این صورت بوده است: 🔹مطالعه بخش‌هایی از دروس به‌صورت پراکنده 🔹عدم تکمیل مباحث هر درس 🔹نداشتن برنامه مطالعاتی منسجم مهم‌ترین کاری که باید انجام بدیم چیه ؟! دوازدهم و چیکار کنیم ؟! دروسی که پراکنده خوندیم و چیکار کنیم ؟!

5

4 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈3,440 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

دسته ۳: مطالعه ، بدون مرور و تست این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که مطالعه مباحث را به پایان رسانده‌اند، اما پس از آن مستقیماً روی امتحانات نهایی تمرکز کرده‌اند. 🔶روند آن‌ها شامل: 🔹مطالعه مباحث 🔹آمادگی و شرکت در امتحانات نهایی پایه دوازدهم 🔶اما مراحل زیر را انجام نداده‌اند: 🔹مرور مطالب 🔹رفع اشکال 🔹حل تست‌های کنکور سال‌های اخیر تفاوت دسته دوم و سوم ؟! آیا میتونیم کنکور سال‌های اخیر رو کار کنیم ؟! روزهای پایانی ماقب

3

4 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈3,510 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

دسته ۲: مطالعه و مرور کامل، بدون تکمیل مرحله نهایی این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که بخش عمده برنامه راهبردی را انجام داده‌اند، اما به دلیل محدودیت زمان، موفق به تکمیل مراحل پایانی نشده‌اند. 🔶روند مطالعاتی آن‌ها شامل: 🔹مطالعه کامل مباحث 🔹مرور مطالب 🔹شرکت در امتحانات نهایی پایه دوازدهم تفاوت بین دروس پایه و دوازدهم ؟! چه کتابایی مرور و چه کتابایی رفع اشکال بشن ؟! آزمون میتونیم بدیم ؟! یونس عبادالهیان | مدیرآموزشی

3

4 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC≈4,170 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

دسته ۱: اجرای کامل برنامه راهبردی این دسته شامل دانش‌آموزانی است که تمامی مراحل برنامه راهبردی را به‌طور کامل انجام داده‌اند. 🔶روند مطالعاتی آن‌ها شامل: 🔹مطالعه کامل مباحث 🔹مرور و تثبیت مطالب 🔹رفع اشکال 🔹حل تست‌های کنکور سال‌های اخیر چه کسایی برن سراغ آزمون ؟! چه کسایی مرور انجام بدن و چه کسایی رفع اشکال ؟! تورق سریع و از کی شروع کنیم ؟! یونس عبادالهیان | مدیرآموزشی FP 🆔 @ebadollahian_Fplus

3

4 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC419 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‼️بریم سراغ دسته بندی‼️ دسته ۱: اجرای کامل برنامه راهبردی دسته ۲ | فقط رفع اشکال و کنکورهای اخیر را انجام نداده‌اند دسته ۳ | فقط مطالعه داشته‌اند و هیچ مرور و رفع اشکالی صورت نگرفته دسته ۴ | مطالعه پراکنده داشته‌ دسته ۵ | فقط برای امتحانات نهایی دوازدهم مطالعه شده یونس عبادالهیان | مدیرآموزشی FP 🆔 @ebadollahian_Fplus

7

2 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC470 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر شرایط دیگه‌ای داشتی گوشه پایین سمت چپ میتونی برام پیام بزاری تا راهنماییت کنم 🫣

8

2 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC522 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

شرایطت برای کنکور چطوره ؟! 😶

  1. مطالعه کاملی داشتم هم مرور کردم و هم کنکور سال‌های اخیر رو بررسی و تحلیل کردم15%
  2. مطالعه و مرور داشتم اما هنوز کنکور سال‌های اخیر رو نرفتم سراغشون13%
  3. فقط تونستم تا قبل از امتحانات نهایی مطالعه خودمو کامل کنم برای کنکور و مروری نداشتم17%
  4. دست و پا شکسته یه چیزایی تا قبل از نهایی ها خوندم35%
  5. فقط دوازدهم و برای نهایی خوندم21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC453 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

یه نظرسنجی بریم برای شرایطتون بعد از نهایی‌ها

6

1 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC577 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026

امتحان چطور بود امروز ؟! خوووب ❤️ اصلااا خوب نبود 💔

💔5310

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ebadollahian_Fplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

شرایطت برای کنکور چطوره ؟! 😶

  1. مطالعه کاملی داشتم هم مرور کردم و هم کنکور سال‌های اخیر رو بررسی و تحلیل کردم15%
  2. مطالعه و مرور داشتم اما هنوز کنکور سال‌های اخیر رو نرفتم سراغشون13%
  3. فقط تونستم تا قبل از امتحانات نهایی مطالعه خودمو کامل کنم برای کنکور و مروری نداشتم17%
  4. دست و پا شکسته یه چیزایی تا قبل از نهایی ها خوندم35%
  5. فقط دوازدهم و برای نهایی خوندم21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

چند ساعت استفاده‌ از موبایل داشتی ؟! 😶

  1. کمتر از ۲ ساعت22%
  2. بین ۲ تا ۴ ساعت16%
  3. بین ۴ تا ۶ ساعت15%
  4. بیش از ۶ ساعت47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کنکورسلام | مشاوره کنکور فرهنگیان
@konkoorsalamir · 69,505
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
کنکورستان | حسین بنائی
@konkourestan_ir · 38,506
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یونس عبادالهیان | مدیر آموزشی” (@ebadollahian_Fplus), 2,682 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebadollahian_Fplus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.