Channel
@eau_decringe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,702subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001935717491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eau_decringe |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eau_decringe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 1,702 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 1,701 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 1,702 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,702 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (28 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,761 |
| Reactions total | 246 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,192 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 636 | 53.4% | |
| 🔥 | 333 | 27.9% | |
| 😢 | 102 | 8.56% | |
| custom 5208952395471535459 | 71 | 5.96% | |
| custom 5190472602895798301 | 37 | 3.10% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eau_decringe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
L'Amant L'Artisan Parfumeur Наконец-то и к нам подвезли новинку! Прикасаться к бархату наклейки одно удовольствие) По аромату: старт очень красивый. Яркие жгучие специи с тлеющим ладаном, кожей, легкое животинкой похожей на уд. Где-то между пробегают дымно-ореховые грани ветивера. Когда вдохнул аромат, я подумал: «Боже, артизаны давно такого добротного не делали. Плотно! Интеллектуально!» Через минут 7 на блотере …
❤12
Зарегался я в тиктоке, активный очень тренд на парфюмерию и чего там только я не видел за последние дни) Ищите инжир? AMOUAGE DIA!😳😳😳 Берём?) инжирный тренд вроде снова набирает обороты) Я кстати влюбился в этот. Давайте глумиться 😈
😢19custom 520895239547153545911
Меня с почином! Разбил в Космотеке колбу с флакона Фуэгии 💀 Я понимаю, это красиво выглядит. Но там любой сквозняк и они посыпятся! Зачем их так ставить??? Сам их вид вызывает у меня паничку! Прежде чем разбиться, колба подпрыгнула как мячик три раза, но я все равно не успел ее поймать 😂 Консультант сказала мне что-то грубое неводольным голосом, но я не услышал 😅 Ей повезло)
❤42😢35custom 52089523954715354599💯4
Всем доброго утра! ⛩️🎎 У меня был небольшой интернет-детокс 🌚 От происходящего вокруг фляга начинает свистеть уже серьезно. Спасает лишь Mandarino Laboratorio Olfattivo, который мне щедро налила Дарья 🥰 Почти спшикал 10мл и, похоже, нужен флакон. Аромат я люблю очень давно. Удивительно, насколько высокого качества эфирное масло мандарина в этом аромате. Я пробовал разных производителей и ни одно не звучало так крас…
🔥37❤17
Вышла новая статья Сергея Борисова как раз к сентябрю 🌞
❤23custom 52089523954715354596🔥2
На меня активно подписываются какие-то порно-боты… у всех так? Что происходит 😭
custom 520895239547153545917😢12
🕷Black Orchid Tom Ford🕷 Красивейшая нестареющая классика от «Короля пачулей». Заварные белые цветы, за шлейфом которых хочется бежать бесконечно, а также по совместительству один из моих любимых ароматов (позже узнаем почему). Ароматы как-либо связанные с орхидеями это всегда забавно. С одной стороны, ваниль – это орхидея. С другой, большинство орхидей рода фаленопсис (которые стоят в каждом цветочном магазине и к …
❤38🔥5💯3
Предсказуемо победила Черная Орхидея! Я умудрился подхватить ОРВИ в +25, поэтому пишу пост-разбор о победителе в соплях и с кашлем. Обратил внимание, что при каждой простуде страдает именно то, что ты больше всего используешь. Когда я занимался вокалом постоянно терял голос и воспалялись связки. Теперь исключительно отекает слизистая и смазанное обоняние 2-4 дня 🫠 У вас такого нет? Пост ждать завтра 🧴🕷💛
😢36🔥8❤3💯3
Распаковка 🥹 Давно хотел, все-таки взял флакон) Сложилось все: моя любовь к перцу, морской соли и цвету флакона ♥️
🔥42❤10
Всем доброго утречка 🤡 Только что понюхал впервые за последние лет 5 табакованиль. Его переделали??? Почему так красиво??? МНЕ НУЖЕН ТАБАКАВАНИЛЬ? 😳😳😳 Приплыли 💀 Может я просто не выспался… Update* Так, ложная тревога меня отпустило)))) Забавно как сильно влияют на восприятие аромата его копии. Аромат по-прежнему хорош, но в итоге мне он пахнет диффузором для туалета, просто потому что они повсюду. И я бы хотел бе…
❤37custom 52089523954715354597🔥4
Что будем разбирать на этот раз? *можно несколько* 🕵🏻♂️👩🏻🔬
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Друзья, я в лютой запаре с брендом, скоро приду с новостями) и обещанным разбором аромата 🥹 Картинка для привлечения внимания 😂 Партия новинки практически раскуплена, осталась пара флаконов, пишите в лс кому надо 💋
❤51🔥11custom 52089523954715354594
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @eau_decringe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что будем разбирать на этот раз? *можно несколько* 🕵🏻♂️👩🏻🔬
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 642,526 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В пирамиде не заявлено!” (@eau_decringe), 1,702 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eau_decringe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.