Channel
@easybackend
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
360subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001643929710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @easybackend |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/easybackend |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 360 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 362 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 362 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 13 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (13 May 2024 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 275 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
196 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 184 | 93.9% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.53% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Осторожно, мошенники Уже второй знакомый за последнее время добавляет в группу, якобы он участвует в каком-то конкурсе и нужно проголосовать. Подозреваю, их обоих уже взломали. При попытке проголосовать вам предложат авторизоваться в телеграм и вашим аккаунтом так же завладеют злоумышленники. Имейте в виду и предупредите родных, чтобы не потерять свой телеграм (а так же добавьте второй фактор себе и близким)
👍6
Dialang - изучай языки через диалоги Мы работали над @dialang_app несколько лет и по милости Аллаха запустили его. Почему так долго? Не потому, что продукт сложный, а потому что жизнь непредсказуема и непроста. Главный вывод, который я сделал: большая милость от Аллаха это команда, которая не теряет мотивацию и готова идти до конца, несмотря на все возникающие спады и сложности. Теперь немного о приложении. Мы сдел…
👍16⚡2
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته До конца приема документов на Хадж осталось совсем немного времени. Ориентир до 25го декабря. В связи с этим хотелось бы поделиться несколькими важными мыслями: 1. Возможно на нас есть обязанность ехать уже сейчас, хотя мы думаем, что ее нет. Возможно отсутствие своего жилья не показатель отсутствия возможности, так как есть арендное. Так же возможно хорошая машина может быть показа…
👍41
Стоит ли программисту вести свои проекты? Ко мне обратились представители @ingacademy_magas с просьбой дать комментарий на тему ведения айтишником своих проектов. Накидал несколько мыслей, исходя из своего опыта. Возможно кто-то найдет для себя полезным: - Исходники в блоге нашего сообщества Ingternet: https://ingternet.ru/programmer-founder - Итоговая статья в издании "Эксперт Юг": https://expertsouth.ru/articles/…
👍10
Рейтинг IT работодателей 2025. Внутри разбивки по сферам, количеству сотрудников и тд. Некоторые компании довольно неожиданно видеть в топах. Полезный список, от которого можно отталкиваться при поиске работы https://habr.com/ru/specials/965986/
👍6
Защищаем свой .env от ИИ После курса AI Fluency приступил к следующему: Claude Code in Action. В курсе помимо прочего объясняется тема pre/post хуков. Если коротко, через хуки можно навешивать доп обработки перед и после взаимодействия Claude Code с Claude. Что примечательно, польза pre хуков объясняется на примере возможности защиты .env файла, с приложением всего необходимого для быстрой реализации у себя на устро…
👍3🆒1
Недавно провели стрим о входе в профессию тестировщика. Обсудили много интересных вопросов и конечно же не обошли стороной указание ложного опыта в резюме 🙂 Кто рассматривает эту профессию, очень советую посмотреть https://t.me/ingternet/651
👍7
AI Fluency & UX Прохожу мини-курс AI Fluency от Anthropic. Там про базовые принципы взаимодействия с генеративным AI. Советую посмотреть, очень емко. Однако пост больше про UX, который выстроили ребята. Сам сайт и видео контент в целом очень приятно выглядят. Но удивило то, что фон на видео сделан такой же, как на сайте, и ты как будто не встроенное видео смотришь, а динамичный сайт. Как вам, дизайнеры?
👍5🆒1
Kiro Amazon запустили свою IDE для vibe-кодинга Kiro. На начальном этапе она бесплатная, выглядит как хорошая возможность поэкспериментировать. После запуска видимо было большое количество желающих, поэтому скачивание Kiro более недоступно на сайте, есть возможность только добавиться в waitlist. Однако не спешите кусать локти. Сайт для простых пользователей, а мы не из таких, поэтому идем в терминал: brew install…
👍10
Posted without readable text
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dpWXxqsxKw&t=919s Вчера состоялся интересный стрим на канале Исы Эзербаева, где в качестве гостя выступил организатор Ingternet Яхья Картоев. Братья говорили про ИИ, язык Go, и про ситуацию с наймом.
👍9⚡2
У меня приятная новость. Завтра в 19:30 у нас стрим с Яхья, senior Go разработчиком, который сейчас работает в бигтех, компанию мы все знаем, но озвучивать ее мы не будем чтобы было легче с nda) Основные темы на которые поговорим: Go, что творится с рынком и наймом, что там с ИИ Ссылку скину позже)
👍13🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @easybackend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,066,385 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яхья Картоев | Backend простым языком” (@easybackend), 360 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/easybackend.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.